Skip to main content
Log in

Restricted access to the environment and quality of life in adult survivors of childhood brain tumors

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Survivors of pediatric brain tumors (BTs) are at-risk for late effects which may affect mobility within and access to the physical environment. This study examined the prevalence of and risk factors for restricted environmental access in survivors of childhood BTs and investigated the associations between reduced environmental access, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and survivors’ social functioning. In-home evaluations were completed for 78 BT survivors and 78 population-based controls matched on age, sex, and zip-code. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for poor environmental access and reduced HRQOL. The median age of survivors was 22 years at the time of study. Compared to controls, survivors were more likely to report avoiding most dimensions of their physical environment, including a single flight of stairs (p < 0.001), uneven surfaces (p < 0.001), traveling alone (p = 0.01), and traveling to unfamiliar places (p = 0.001). Overall, survivors were 4.8 times more likely to report poor environmental access (95 % CI 2.0–11.5, p < 0.001). In survivors, poor environmental access was associated with reduced physical function (OR = 3.6, 95 % CI 1.0–12.8, p = 0.04), general health (OR = 6.0, 95 % CI 1.8–20.6, p = 0.002), and social functioning (OR = 4.3, 95 % CI 1.1–17.3, p = 0.03). Adult survivors of pediatric BTs were more likely to avoid their physical environment than matched controls. Restricted environmental access was associated with reduced HRQOL and diminished social functioning. Interventions directed at improving physical mobility may have significant impact on survivor quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Cancer Institute (1975–2008) (2011) SEER Cancer Statistics Review. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2008/. Accessed 25 Aug 2011

  2. Armstrong GT, Liu Q, Yasui Y et al (2009) Long-term outcomes among adult survivors of childhood central nervous system malignancies in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:946–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA et al (2006) Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 355:1572–1582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hudson MM, Mertens AC, Yasui Y et al (2003) Health status of adult long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. JAMA 290:1583–1592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ness KK, Mertens AC, Hudson MM et al (2005) Limitations on physical performance and daily activities among long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Ann Intern Med 143:639–647

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ness KK, Morris EB, Nolan VG et al (2010) Physical performance limitations among adult survivors of childhood brain tumors. Cancer 116:3034–3044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ness KK, Gurney JG, Zeltzer LK et al (2008) The impact of limitations in physical, executive, and emotional function on health-related quality of life among adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:128–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K, Chaves PH, Johnson BA (2005) Preclinical mobility disability predicts incident mobility disability in older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:M43–M52

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shumway-Cook A, Patla A, Stewart AL, Ferrucci L, Ciol MA, Guralnik JM (2005) Assessing environmentally determined mobility disability: self-report versus observed community mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:700–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shumway-Cook A, Patla A, Stewart A, Ferrucci L, Ciol MA, Guralnik JM (2003) Environmental components of mobility disability in community-living older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:393–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 49:71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Selby PJ, Chapman JA, Etazadi-Amoli J, Dalley D, Boyd NF (1984) The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. Br J Cancer 50:13–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. de Boer AG, van Lanschot JJ, Stalmeier PF et al (2004) Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? Qual Life Res 13:311–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Packer RJ, Gurney JG, Punyko JA et al (2003) Long-term neurologic and neurosensory sequelae in adult survivors of a childhood brain tumor: childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol 21:3255–3261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reuben DB, Siu AL (1990) An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients. The physical performance test. J Am Geriatr Soc 38:1105–1112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jette AM (1987) The Functional Status Index: reliability and validity of a self-report functional disability measure. J Rheumatol Suppl 14(suppl. 15):15–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaufman A, Kaufman KN (2004) Brief intelligence test, 2nd edn. NCS Pearson, Inc, Circle Pines

    Google Scholar 

  19. Derogatis L (2000) Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. NCS Pearson, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  20. Recklitis CJ, Parsons SK, Shih MC, Mertens A, Robison LL, Zeltzer L (2006) Factor structure of the brief symptom inventory 18 in adult survivors of childhood cancer: results from the childhood cancer survivor study. Psychol Assess 18:22–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boydell KM, Stasiulis E, Greenberg M, Greenberg C, Spiegler B (2008) I’ll show them: the social construction of (in) competence in survivors of childhood brain tumors. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 25:164–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koch SV, Kejs AM, Engholm G, Moller H, Johansen C, Schmiegelow K (2006) Leaving home after cancer in childhood: a measure of social independence in early adulthood. Pediatr Blood Cancer 47:61–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Richards JS, Bombardier CH, Tate D, Dijkers M, Gordon W, Shewchuk R et al (1999) Access to the environment and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:1501–1506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Whiteneck GG, Gerhart KA, Cusick CP (2004) Identifying environmental factors that influence the outcomes of people with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 19:191–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate DG, Bushnik T, Forchheimer MB (2004) Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:1793–1803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ikeda A, Iso H, Kawachi I, Yamagishi K, Inoue M, Tsugane S (2008) Social support and stroke and coronary heart disease: the JPHC study cohorts II. Stroke 39:768–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson PD (2003) Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Arteriosc Thromb Vasc Biol 23:e42–e49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Seeman TE, Miller-Martinez DM, Stein Merkin S, Lachman ME, Tun PA, Karlamangla AS (2011) Histories of social engagement and adult cognition: midlife in the U.S. study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 66(suppl. 1):i141–i152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Strawbridge WJ, Deleger S, Roberts RE, Kaplan GA (2002) Physical activity reduces the risk of subsequent depression for older adults. Am J Epidemiol 156:328–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Glass TA, De Leon CF, Bassuk SS, Berkman LF (2006) Social engagement and depressive symptoms in late life: longitudinal findings. J Aging Health 18:604–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant RSGPB-06-210-01-CPPB from the American Cancer Society (K.K.N.). Additional funding at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital was provided by the American Lebanese-Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC) and, at the University of Minnesota, by the Masonic Cancer Center.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tara M. Brinkman.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 135 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brinkman, T.M., Li, Z., Neglia, J.P. et al. Restricted access to the environment and quality of life in adult survivors of childhood brain tumors. J Neurooncol 111, 195–203 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-1001-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-1001-6

Keywords

Navigation