Abstract
The study of the aesthetic genres reveals important design features of cognition, in how complex higher-order abilities are organized mentally. An evolutionary perspective frames this research in a way that considers the componential nature of language-related abilities in particular. In addition, it directs our attention to the important problem of understanding how different abilities are related. In this review of the research the focus will be on poetic and narrative abilities: (1) as they develop in children, (2) how the component sub-structures of poetry and narrative might be represented cognitively, and (3) how they may have emerged in early humans. Crucially, the analysis of component structures implies understanding how they interact in performance, and more interestingly how different abilities and faculties share competence modules and processing mechanisms in common. This approach helps put the discussion regarding the relative weight of domain-specific and domain-general structures into perspective, potentially reconciling some seemingly opposing viewpoints in evolutionary science and in the study of language development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Decisive empirical evidence for evolutionary foundations of music, poetry and other artistic genres is probably forever out of reach. But informed speculation on this problem has an important purpose. First of all, it is not likely that the capabilities in question emerged in a recent historical period, separated from the origin of language and the higher-order cognitive faculties by many thousands of years. Thus, theoretical coherence invites consideration of the different origin scenarios. For example, a hypothesis about the domain-specificity of a module specialized for a given competence should consider at least one plausible account of evolutionary emergence; two or three logical possibilities would be even better. If, say, all evolutionary possibilities that include natural selection as a mechanism can be discarded, the hypothesis for a domain-specific component should perhaps be reformulated. If no plausible evolutionary account of any kind can be proposed, and direct findings from archaeological and population genetics research disfavor it, the claim would appear to be severely weakened. Then lacking indirect neuropsychological and behavioral evidence in modern humans, alternative models that might account for the competence in question should be seriously examined.
A prominent contemporary of the great Russian children’s poet, Vygotsky (1930/2004), also saw in young children’s impulse to deform and exaggerate their representations in play (with the greatest delight derived from the most outrageous excess) a necessary stage in the development of advanced artistic creation and scientific thinking.
Kotthoff’s (2001) idea of the aesthetization of vocal expression of “basic expressions” is strikingly parallel to the ethnographic description by Cuban musicologist Alejo Carpentier (1953/1985) of ritual wailing and conjuration presented in his celebrated novel Los pasos perdidos [The lost steps]. The portrayal formed part of his discussion of the theory of a common origin of music and language in proto-linguistic/musical human vocalization (the same origin, we might speculate, is shared by poetry). The intense and deeply felt affective responses of grief and magical communion with the spirit of the moribund Amazonian hunter-gatherer, by the shaman on this occasion, laid recourse to the primal foundations of poetic discourse (in Los pasos perdidos, metaphorically, for the first time). “As well in Georgia, cries of grief and appeals to the deceased occur. They are spoken or sung, slowly falling intonation contours with integrated peaks, bowed bodily postures and an expressive lexicon” (Kotthoff 2001, p. 168). For the same ritual escenification, see Carpentier (1953/1985, pp. 182–229).
See footnote 3.
According to Navarrete Gómez (personal communication), itemization is a common rhetorical device used in a number of different public registers in the first language of the narrator (Nahuatl), and by bilinguals (in Spanish) in the region of Central Mexico where he lived. For discussion of traditional narrative styles, see Navarrete Gómez (2009).
The difficult distinction between vernacular poetry and art poetry should be taken as roughly analogous to the difference between folk music and concert music, more widely accepted but similarly subject to overlaps and ill-defined boundaries. In this discussion, the former should be taken as poetry that is more likely to be integrated into everyday and culturally-specific discourses, typically not written and edited for publication, or deliberately composed as a separate creative activity to stand alone as a work by itself. Art poetry today is typically a composition that is edited for publication or formal performance, such as a reading. As opposed to integration into ritual or other exceptional language use context, it is more likely to be composed as part of a separate creative act by a professional writer or self-identified poet, resulting in the creation of a fixed text (oral or written).
Functional, or functionalist, accounts of the evolution of language in archaic humans present arguments that are plausible and convincing. But the same arguments are not necessarily relevant in all respects to the problem of explaining language development in children. The latter is a research problem of ontogeny, the former a question about how the human language acquisition capacity came to form part of the biological endowment of our species. Victorri (2002) is an example where these research problems tend to be confounded.
References
Ash, S., Moore, P., Antini, S., McCawley, G., Work, M., & Grossman, M. (2006). Trying to tell a tale: Discourse impairments in progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 66, 1405–1413.
Bamberg, M., & Moissinac, L. (2003). Discourse development. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Golman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 395–437). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628–647.
Berman, R. (2008). The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language, 35, 735–771.
Bjorklund, D., & Kipp, K. (2002). Social cognition, inhibition, and theory of mind: The evolution of human intelligence. In R. Sternberg & J. Kaufman (Eds.), The evolution of intelligence (pp. 27–54). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Boudreau, D. (2008). Narrative abilities: Advances in research and implications for clinical practice. Topics in Language Disorders, 28, 99–114.
Boyd, B. (2008). Art as adaptation: A challenge. Style, 42, 138–143.
Brown, S. (2000). The “musilanguage” model of music and evolution. In N. Wallin, B. Merker, & S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 272–300). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brown, S. (2003). Biomusicology and three biological paradoxes about music. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 4, 15–17.
Burling, R. (2005). The talking ape: How language evolved. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carota, F., & Sirigu, A. (2008). Neural bases of sequence processing in action and language. Language Learning, 58(Supplement), 179–199.
Carpentier, A. (1985). Los pasos perdidos. Barcelona: Bruguera.
Carroll, J. (2008). An evolutionary paradigm for literary study. Style, 42, 103–135.
Carruthers, P. (2009). The distinctively human mind: The many pillars of cumulative culture. In G. Hatfield (Ed.), The evolution of mind, brain and culture. Pittsburg: Penn Museum Press.
Carter, R. (2006). The limits of imagination. In R. H. Wells & J. McFadden (Eds.), Human nature: Fact and fiction (pp. 128–143). London: Continuum.
Chang, C.-J. (2004). Telling stories of experiences: Narrative development of young Chinese children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 83–104.
Chiappe, D., & MacDonald, K. (2005). The evolution of domain-general mechanisms in intelligence and learning. The Journal of General Psychology, 132, 5–40.
Chukovsky, K. (1925/1963). From two to five. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Darwin, C. (1871/1981). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dautenhahn, K. (2002). The origins of narrative: In search of the transactional format of narratives in humans and other social animals. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1, 97–123.
de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (2003). Language for thought: Coming to understand false beliefs. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 335–384). Cambridge: MIT Press.
DeSalle, R., & Tattersall, I. (2008). Human origins: What bones and genomes tell us about ourselves. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.
Dillehay, T. (2009). Probing deeper into first American studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 971–978.
Dissanayake, E. (2000). Antecedents of the temporal arts in early mother–infant interaction. In N. Wallin, B. Merker, & S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 389–410). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dowker, A., Krasowicz, G., Pinto, G., Roazzi, A., & Smith, A. (1998). Phonological and semantic devices in very young children’s poems: A cross-cultural study. Current Psychological Cognition, 17, 389–416.
Dowling, W., Tillman, B., & Ayers, D. (2001). Memory and the experience of hearing music. Music Perception, 19, 249–276.
Everett, D. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46, 621–646.
Fabb, N. (2008). Linguistics in the study and teaching of literature. Linguistics and Language Compass, 2, 1135–1148.
Fabb, N. (2010). Is literary language a development of ordinary language? Lingua, 120, 1217–1222.
Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Francis, N. (2001). Géneros orales y estilos de narrativa: El desarrollo de la competencia discursiva. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada, 33, 71–92.
Francis, N. (2006). The development of secondary discourse ability and metalinguistic awareness in second language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16, 37–60.
Geary, D. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Kaschak, M. P. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of language production and comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 91–114.
Haverkort, M., & de Roder, J. H. (2003). Poetry, language, and ritual performance. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 4, 269–286.
Inkelas, S. (2003). J’s rhymes: A longitudinal case study of language play. Journal of Child Language, 30, 557–581.
Jackendoff, R., & Lerdahl, F. (2006). The capacity for music: What is it and what’s special about it? Cognition, 100, 33–72.
Jahandarie, K. (1999). Spoken and written discourse: A multidisciplinary perspective. Stamford: Ablex.
Joffe, V. (1998). Rhyming and related skills in children with specific language impairment. Current Psychology of Cognition, 17, 479–512.
Justus, T., & Hustler, J. (2005). Fundamental issues in the evolutionary psychology of music. Music Perception, 23, 1–27.
Kim, O., Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M.-J., & Kremer, K. (2008). Cat, rat, and rugrats: Narrative comprehension in young children with Down syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 20, 337–351.
Klein, R. (2009). Darwin and the recent origin of modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 16007–16009.
Kotthoff, H. (2001). Aesthetic dimensions of Georgian grief rituals: On the artful display of emotions in lamentation. In H. Kotthoff & H. Knoblauch (Eds.), Verbal art across cultures (pp. 167–194). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Lerdahl, F. (2003). The sounds of poetry viewed as music. In I. Peretz & R. J. Zatorre (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of music (pp. 413–429). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lynch, J., van den Broek, P., Kremer, K., Kendeou, P., White, M.-J., & Lorch, E. (2008). The development of narrative comprehension and its relation to other early reading skills. Reading Psychology, 29, 327–365.
MacMahon, B. (2007). The effects of sound patterning in poetry: A cognitive pragmatic approach. Journal of Literary Semantics, 36, 103–120.
Mar, R. (2004). The neuropsychology of narrative: Story comprehension, story production and their interrelation. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1414–1434.
Miall, D., & Dissanayake, E. (2003). The poetics of babytalk. Human Nature, 14, 337–364.
Mithen, S. (2009). The music instinct: The evolutionary basis of musicality. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 3–12.
Motokiyu, T. (Ed.). (2005). Also, with my throat. I shall swallow ten thousand swords: Araki Yasusada’s letters in English. Cumberland, RI: Combo Books.
Navarrete Gómez, P. R. (2009). Cuentos náhuatl de la Malintzin. San Miguel Canoa, Puebla: Seminario de Estudios Modernos y de Cultura Acal-lan. http://www4.nau.edu/seminario/Antología.pdf.
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Patel, A. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peretz, I. (2009). Music, language and modularity in action. In P. Rebuschat, M. Rohrmeier, J. Hawkins, & I. Cross (Eds.), Language and music as cognitive systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perlmutter, D. (2008). Nobilior est vulgaris: Dante’s hypothesis and sign language poetry. In K. Lindgren, D. DeLuca, & D. J. Napoli (Eds.), Signs and voices: Deaf culture, identity, language, and arts (pp. 189–213). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Ross, H. (2009). The art of fusion. In K. Hanson & S. Inkelas (Eds.), The nature of the word: Studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky (pp. 677–696). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2001). Food, foragers, and folklore: The role of narrative in human subsistence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 221–240.
Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2005). Reverse-engineering narrative: Evidence of special design. In J. Gottschall & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp. 177–196). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2008). Narrative as social mapping, case study: The trickster genre and the free rider problem. Ometeca, 12, 24–42.
Schmelz, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Chimpanzees know that others make inferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 17284–17289.
Shettleworth, S. (2000). Modularity and the evolution of cognition. In C. Heyes & L. Huber (Eds.), The evolution of cognition (pp. 43–60). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sirigu, A., Cohen, L., Zalla, T., Pradat-Diehl, P., Van Eckhout, J., Grafman, J., et al. (1998). Distinct frontal regions for processing sentence syntax and story grammar. Cortex, 43, 771–778.
Skowronski, J., & Sedikides, C. (2007). Temporal knowledge and autobiographical memory: An evolutionary perspective. In R. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 505–517). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. (2008). Culture and modularity. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Culture and cognition (pp. 149–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tillmanm, B., & Dowling, W. J. (2007). Memory decreases for prose, but not for poetry. Memory and Cognition, 35, 628–639.
Tomasello, M. (2011). Human culture in evolutionary perspective. In M. Gelfand, C.-Y. Chiu, & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Advances in culture and psychology (pp. 5–52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction and the arts. SubStance, 94(95), 6–27.
Trionfi, G., & Reese, E. (2009). A good story: Children with imaginary companions create richer narratives. Child Development, 4, 1301–1313.
Victorri, B. (2002). Homo narrans: Le rôle de la narration dans l’émergence du langage. Langages, 146, 112–125.
Vygotsky, L. (1930/2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francis, N. Poetry and narrative: an evolutionary perspective on the cognition of verbal art. Neohelicon 39, 267–294 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-012-0148-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-012-0148-7