Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wood production per evapotranspiration was increased by irrigation in plantations of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wood volume growth per unit evapotranspiration was calculated from water balance and growth measurements in irrigated and water-limited Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens plantations in the 3rd, 4th and 5th year of growth. Wood volume growth per unit evapotranspiration (plantation water productivity) was increased by irrigation for both species in the 3rd and 4th growing year but only in E. nitens in the 5th year. Irrigated trees required significantly less water than water-limited trees to produce 1 m3 of wood. At the same site, stomatal conductance was significantly greater in irrigated compared to water stressed trees through spring, summer and early autumn of each year. These data provide indirect evidence that leaf-scale measures of water-use efficiency are not well correlated with stand-scale measures of plantation water productivity. This was probably due to increased proportional allocation of assimilated carbon to stem wood in the irrigated compared to the water-limited stands. These results are consistent with recent studies in Brazil and Australia and suggest that plantation management systems, inclusive of tree breeding, that maximise growth rather than leaf-scale water-use efficiency, will also maximise the amount of wood produced from each unit of water used by the stand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABARE (2009) Australian Forest and Wood Products Statistics, March and June Quarters 2009. ABARE, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Aussenac G, Grieu P, Guehl JM (1989) Drought resistance of 2 Douglas-Fir species (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb) Franco and Pseudotsuga macrocarpa (Torr) Mayr): relative importance of water-use efficiency and root-growth potential. Ann Sci For 46:S384–S387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia M, Sands P (1997) Modelling site productivity of Eucalyptus globulus in response to climatic and site factors. Aust J Plant Physiol 24:831–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D, Stape JL, Ryan MG (2004) Thinking about efficiency of resource use in forests. For Ecol Manag 193:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (2009) Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crop Res 112:119–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannell MGR (1985) Dry matter partitioning in tree crops. In: Cannell MGR, Jackson JE (eds) Attributes of trees as crop plants. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon, England, pp 160–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Carle J, Vuorinen P, Del Lungo E (2002) Status and trends in global forest plantation development. For Prod J 52:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • de Miguel M, Cabezas JA, de Maria N, Sanchez-Gomez D, Guevara M-A, Velez M-D, Saez-Laguna E, Diaz L-M, Mancha J-A, Barbero M-C, Collada C, Diaz-Sala C, Aranda I, Cervera M-T (2014) Genetic control of functional traits related to photosynthesis and water use efficiency in Pinus pinaster Ait. drought response: integration of genome annotation, allele association and QTL detection for candidate gene identification. BMC Genom 15:464–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dye P (2013) A review of changing perspectives on Eucalyptus water-use in South Africa. For Ecol Manag 301:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2013) Global forest resources assessment 2010. In: FAO Technical paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

  • Farquhar GD, von Caemmarer S (1982) Modelling of photosynthetic response to environmental conditions. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology, vol 12b., Physiological plant ecology II, water relations and carbon assimilationSpringer, Berlin, pp 550–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar GD, Wong SC (1984) An empirical model of stomatal conductance. Aust J Plant Physiol 11:191–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester DI, Theiveyanathan S, Collopy JJ, Marcar NE (2010) Enhanced water use efficiency in a mixed Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii plantation. For Ecol Manag 259:1761–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood AJB (2013) Review: the first stages of Australian forest water regulation: national reform and regional implementation. Environ Sci Policy 29:124–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall AE, Ismail AM, Menendez CM (1993) Implications for plant breeding of genotypic and drought-induced differences in water use efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination and gas exchange. In: Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar GD (eds) Stable isotopes and plant carbon–water relations. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 349–369

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Honeysett JL, Beadle CL, Turnbull CRA (1992) Evapotranspiration and growth of two contrasting species of eucalyptus under non-limiting and limiting water availability. For Ecol Manag 50:203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honeysett JL, White DA, Worledge D, Beadle CL (1996) Growth and water use of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens in irrigated and rainfed plantations. Aust For 59:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard RM, Stape J, Ryan MG, Almeida AC, Rojas J (2010) Effects of irrigation on water use and water use efficiency in two fast growing Eucalyptus plantations. For Ecol Manag 259:1714–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HG (1993) Drought tolerance and water-use efficiency. In: Smith JAC, Griffiths H (eds) Water deficits, plant responses from cell to community. Bios, Oxford, pp 193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CY (2000) Population differences in water-use efficiency of Eucalyptus microtheca seedlings under different watering regimes. Physiol Plant 108:134–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Cai WJ, Campbell EP (2005) Statistical modeling of extreme rainfall in southwest Western Australia. J Climatol 15:853–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane C, White D, Adams M (2004) The apparent feed forward response to vapour pressure deficit of stomata in droughted, field grown Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Plant, Cell Environ 27:1268–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masle J, Gilmore S, Farquhar G (2005) The ERECTA gene regulates plant transpiration efficiency in Arabadopsis. Nature 03835:866–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opie JE (1976) Volume functions for trees of all sizes. For Comm Victoria For Tech Pap 25:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto MSG, Hubbard RM, Binkley D, Stape JL (2014) Dominant clonal Eucalyptus grandis x urophylla trees use water more efficiently. For Ecol Manag 328:117–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura J (1977) Grain yield, harvest index and water use of wheat. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 1:117–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederick LA (1979) Natural variation in shining gum (Eucalyptus nitens). Aust For Res 9:41–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira JS, Tenhunen JD, Lange OL (1987) Stomatal control of photosynthesis of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. trees under field conditions in Portugal. J Exp Bot 38:1678–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prebble RE, Forrest JA, Honeysett JL, Hughes MW, McIntyre DS, Schrale G (1981) Field installation and maintenance. In: Graecen EL (ed) Soil water assessment by the neutron method. CSIRO Australia

  • Roberts J, Rosier PTW (1993) Physiological studies in young Eucalyptus stands in southern India and derived estimates of forest transpiration. Agric Water Manag 24:103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MG, Stape JL, Binkley D, Fonseca S, Loos R, Takahashi EN, Silva CR, Hakamada R, Ferreira JM, Lima AM, Gava JL, Leite FP, Silva G, Andrade H, Alves J (2010) Factors controlling Eucalyptus productivity: how water availability and stand structure alter production and carbon allocation. For Ecol Manag 259:1695–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santantonio D (1989) Dry matter partitioning and fine root production in forests—new approaches to a difficult problem. In: Pereira JS, Landsberg JJ (eds) Biomass production by fast growing trees. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 57–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants, negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants. Science 148:339–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheriff DW, Mattay JP (1995) Simultaneous effects of foliar nitrogen, temperature, and humidity on gas exchange in Pinus radiata. Aust J Plant Physiol 22:615–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stace HCT, Hubble GD, Brewer R, Northcote KH, Sleeman JR, Mulcahy MJ, Hallsworth EG (eds) (1968) A handbook of Australian soils. Rellim, Glenside, South Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Stape JL, Binkley D, Ryan MG (2004a) Eucalyptus production and the supply, use and efficiency of use of water, light and nitrogen across a geographic gradient in Brazil. For Ecol Manag 193:17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stape JL, Binkley D, Ryan MG, Gomes AdN (2004b) Water use, water limitation, and water use efficiency in a Eucalyptus plantation. Bosque 25:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stape JL, Binkley D, Ryan MG (2008) Production and carbon allocation in a clonal Eucalyptus plantation with water and nutrient manipulations. For Ecol Manag 255:920–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stape J, Binkley D, Ryan M, Fonseca S, Loos R, Takahashi E, Silva C, Silva S, Hakamada R, Ferreira J, Lima A, Gava J, Leite F, Silva G, Andrade AdH, Alves J (2010) The Brazil Eucalyptus potential productivity project: influence of water, nutrients and stand uniformity on wood production. For Ecol Manag 259:1684–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner NC (1981) Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant Soil 58:339–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White DA. (1996) Physiological responses to drought of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens in plantations. PhD Thesis, School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, p 168

  • White DA, Beadle CL, Worledge D (1996) Leaf water relations of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus and E.nitens: seasonal, drought and species effects. Tree Physiol 16:469–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White DA, Beadle CL, Worledge D, Honeysett JL, Cherry M (1998) The influence of drought on the relationship between leaf and conducting sapwood area in Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens. Trees Struct Func 12:406–414

    Google Scholar 

  • White DA, Beadle CL, Sands PJ, Worledge D, Honeysett JL (1999) Quantifying the effect of cumulative water stress on stomatal conductance of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens: a phenomenological approach. Aust J Plant Physiol 26:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White DA, Beadle CL, Worledge D (2000) Control of transpiration in an irrigated Eucalyptus globulus Labill. plantation. Plant Cell Environ 23:123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White DA, Crombie DS, Kinal J, Battaglia M, McGrath JF, Mendham DS, Walker SN (2009) Managing productivity and drought risk in Eucalyptus globulus plantations in south-western Australia. For Ecol Manag 259:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White DA, Battaglia M, Mendham DS, Crombie DS, Kinal J, McGrath JF (2010) Observed and modelled leaf area index in Eucalyptus globulus plantations: tests of optimality and equilibrium hypotheses. Tree Physiol 30:831–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White DA, McGrath JF, Ryan MG, Battaglia M, Mendham DS, Kinal J, Downes GM, Crombie DS, Hunt MA (2014) Managing for water-use efficient wood production in Eucalyptus globulus plantations. For Ecol Manag 331:272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams KJH (2008) Community attitudes to plantation forestry. In: Technical Report 194. Cooperative Research Centre for Forestry, Hobart, Australia, p 62

  • Williams KJH, Nettle R, Petheram J (2003) Public response to plantation forestry on farms. Aust For 66:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong S, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1985a) Leaf conductance in relation to rate of CO2 assimilation. I. Influence of nitrogen nutrition, phosphorus nutrition, photon flux density, and ambient partial pressure of CO2 during ontogeny. Plant Physiol 78:821–825

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong S, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1985b) Leaf conductance in relation to rate of CO2 assimilation. II. Influences of water sress and photoinhibition. Plant Physiol 78:830–834

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong S, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1985c) Leaf conductance in relation to rate of CO2 assimilation. III. Effects of short-term exposures to different photon flux densities. Plant Physiol 78:826–829

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worledge D, Honeysett JL, White DA, Beadle CL, Hetherington SJ (1998) Scheduling irrigation in plantations of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens: a practical guide. Tasforests 10:91–101

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support was provided by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (Project 8848—Introduction and Cultivation Experiments for Australian Broad-Leaved Tree Species). A CRC Postgraduate Scholarship to DA White is also acknowledged. We thank Messrs D and P Tinning for providing the plantation site and access to water for irrigation and Mr Kim Badcock for technical assistance in the establishment phase of the experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Plant Science and National Centre for Future Forest Industries, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia

    Don A. White

  2. School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia

    Don A. White

  3. Whitegum Forest and Natural Resources Pty Ltd, PO Box 3269, Midland, WA, 6056, Australia

    Don A. White

  4. CSIRO Land and Water Flagship, Private Bag 12, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia

    Christopher L. Beadle, Dale Worledge & John L. Honeysett

  5. Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 98, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia

    Christopher L. Beadle

Authors
  1. Don A. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher L. Beadle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dale Worledge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John L. Honeysett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Don A. White.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

White, D.A., Beadle, C.L., Worledge, D. et al. Wood production per evapotranspiration was increased by irrigation in plantations of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens . New Forests 47, 303–317 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9516-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9516-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation