Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of alternative plant propagation and stand establishment techniques on survival and growth of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) clones

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four eastern cottonwood clones, including standard operational clone ST66 and three advanced clonal selections were produced and included in a test utilizing five different plant propagation methods. Despite relatively large first-year growth differences among clones, all clones demonstrated similar responses to the treatments and clone × cutting treatment interactions were generally non-significant. The effects of changing cutting lengths are consistent with previous studies which indicated the potential for increased plant survival and growth with increased cutting lengths. Differences in stored carbohydrate reserves alone do not appear to completely control first-year growth and development of cuttings. First-year growth of 51 cm long cuttings planted 30.5 cm deep was greater than the same cuttings planted 48 cm deep. Stem form of plants derived from whip-tip propagation did not differ from plants derived from standard, unrooted cuttings. This propagation method offers the potential of far greater production capacity from a cutting orchard and rapid bulk-up of new or limited clones. Stand uniformity assessments suggest that surviving trees of each individual cutting treatment exhibit similar levels of growth variation. Optimization of plantation establishment techniques has the potential to increase growth of young Populus plantations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hereafter referred to as cottonwood.

References

  • Abrahamson LP, White EH, Nowak CA, Biggs RD, Robison DJ (1990) Evaluating hybrid poplar clonal growth potential in a three-year-old genetic selection field trial. Biomass 21(2):101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams JP, Roberts SD (2013) A comparison of growth and stand structural characteristics in pure-and mixed-family stands of loblolly pine. For Sci 59(2):188–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall MJ, King JS, McKeand SE, Bullock BP (2011) Genetic effects on stand-level uniformity and above- and belowground dry mass production in juvenile loblolly pine. For Ecol Manag 262:609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barigah TS, Saugier B, Mousseau M, Guittet J, Ceulemans R (1994) Photosynthesis, leaf area, and productivity of 5 poplar clones during their establishment year. Ann Sci For 51:613–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D (2004) A hypothesis about the interaction of tree dominance and stand production through stand development. For Ecol Manag 190:265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D, Stape JL, Ryan MG, Barnard HR, Fownes J (2002) Age-related decline in forest ecosystem growth: an individual-tree, stand-structure hypothesis. Ecosystems 5:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake GR, Hartge KR (1986) Bulk density. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 363–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman MD, Coyle DR, Blake J, Britton K, Buford M, Campbell B, et al. (2004) Production of short rotation woody crops grown with a range of nutrient and water availability: establishment report and first-year responses. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, p 21. General Technical Report SRS-GTR-072

  • Dale VH, Kline KL, Wright LL, Perlack RD, Downing M, Graham RL (2011) Interactions among bioenergy feedstock choices, landscape dynamics, and land use. Ecol Appl 21(4):1039–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeBell DS, Harrington CA (1997) Productivity of Populus in monoclonal and polyclonal blocks at three spacings. Can J For Res 27:978–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers A, Thomas BR (2003) A comparison of pre-planting treatments on hardwood cuttings of four hybrid poplar clones. New For 26(1):17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine WD, Harrington CA, DeBell DS (2010) Intra-annual growth and mortality of four Populus clones in pure and mixed plantings. New For 39:287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickmann D, Phipps H, Netzer D (1980) Cutting diameter influences early survival and growth of several Populus clones. USDA Forest Service North Central Experiment Station Research Note NC-261, p 4

  • Dougherty D, Wright J (2012) Silviculture and economic evaluation of Eucalypt plantations in the Southern US. Bioresources 7(2):1994–2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer RE Jr, Freitag M, Garlick K (1989) Genetic variation and “C” effects in balsam poplar rooting. Silvae Genet 38(2):62–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Fege AS (1983) The practice and physiological basis of collecting, storing, and planting Populus hardwood cuttings. In USDA Forest Service Gen Tech Rep NC-GTR-91, pp 1–11

  • Foster GS, Rousseau RJ, Nance WL (1998) Eastern cottonwood mixing study: intergenotypic competition effects. For Ecol Manag 112:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen EA, Tolsted DN (1981) Effect of cutting diameter and stem or branch position on establishment of a difficult-to-root clone of a Populus alba hybrid. Can J For Res 11:723–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen E, Tolsted D, Tower M (1991) Planting depth of hybrid poplar cuttings influences number of shoots. USDA Forest Service North Central Experiment Station Research Note NC-355, p 4

  • Heilman PE, Ekuan G, Fogle DB (1994) First-order root development from cuttings of Populus trichocarpa × P. deltoides hybrids. Tree Physiol 14:911–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarek DJ, Coyle DR, Coleman MD (2013) Survival and growth of a range of Populus clones in central South Carolina USA through age ten: do early assessments reflect longer-term survival and growth trends? Biomass Bioenerg 49:260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan BD, Volk TA, Tharakan PJ, Nowak CA, Phillipon SP, Abrahamson LP et al. (2003) Clone-site testing and selections for scale-up plantings. Short-Rotation Woody Crops Program at SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY, p 67. Final Report prepared for the United States Department of Energy under cooperative agreement No. DE-FC36-96GO10132

  • Kline KL, Coleman MD (2010) Woody energy crops in the southeastern United States: two centuries of practitioner experience. Biomass Bioenerg 34(12):1655–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowe SA, Foster GS, Rousseau RJ, Nance WL (1994) Eastern cottonwood mixing study: predicted diameter distribution. Can J For Res 24:405–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox RG, Peet RK, Christensen NL (1989) Population dynamics in loblolly pine stands: changes in skewness and size inequality. Ecology 70(4):1153–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krinard RM (1983) Continued investigations in first year survival of long cottonwood cuttings. Tree Plant Not 34:34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Landhausser SM (2003) Effect of soil temperatures on rooting and early establishment of Balsam Poplar cuttings. Tree Plant Not 50(1):34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexerød NL, Eid T (2006) An evaluation of different diversity indices based on criteria related to forest management planning. For Ecol Manag 222:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo MH, Abrahamson LP (1996) Principal component analysis to evaluate the relative performance of nine year old hybrid poplar clones. Biomass Bioenerg 10(1):1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luu TC, Binkley D, Stape JL (2013) Neighborhood uniformity increases growth of individual Eucalyptus trees. For Ecol Manag 289:90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight JS (1970) Planting cottonwood cuttings for timber production in the South. USDA Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment Station, p 17

  • Metsaranta JM, Lieffers VJ (2008) Inequality of size and size increment in Pinus banksiana in relation to stand dynamics and annual growth. Ann Bot 101:561–571

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohn CA, Randall WK, McKnight JS (1970) Fourteen cottonwood clones selected for Midsouth timber production. Southern Forest Experiment Station, Stoneville, MS, p 18. USDA Forest Service Research Paper SO-62

  • Monclus R, Dreyer E, Delmonte FM, Villar M, Delay D, Boudouresque E et al (2005) Productivity, leaf traits, and carbon isotope discrimination in 29 Populus deltoides × P. nigra clones. New Phytol 67:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson LE, Switzer GL, Lockaby BG (1987) Nutrition of Populus deltoides plantations during maximum production. For Ecol Manag 20(1–2):25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netzer DA, Tolsted DN, Ostry ME, Isebrands JG, Riemenschneider DE, Ward KT (2002) Growth, yield, and disease resistance of 7- to 12-year old poplar clones in the north central United States. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN, p 31. General Technical Report NC-229

  • Nilsson U, Allen HL (2003) Short- and long-term effects of site preparation, fertilization, and vegetation control on growth and stand development of planted loblolly pine. For Ecol Manag 175:367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norfleet L (2007) Soil survey of Bamberg County, South Carolina. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, p 267

  • Olson JR, Jourdain CJ, Rousseau RJ (1985) Selection for cellulose content, specific gravity, and volume in young Populus deltoides clones. Can J For Res 15:393–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes BJ, Erbach DC (2005) Biomass as Feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, p 78. DOE/GO-102995-2135 ORNL/TM-2005/66

  • Perlack RD, Stokes BJ, Lead Authors (2011) US Billion-Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, p 227. ORNL/TM-2011/224. Prepared for the USDOE under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725

  • Puri S, Thompson FB (2003) Effect of soil and plant water relations on rooting of Populus × euramericana stem cuttings. New For 25:109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan MA, Kraft JM, DeBell DS (1987) Bud characteristics of unrooted stem cutting affect establishment success of cottonwood. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Experiment Station Research Note PNWRN-461, p 8

  • Ridge CR, Hinckley TM, Stettler RF, Volkenburgh EV (1986) Leaf growth characteristics of fast-growing poplar hybrids Populus trichocarpa × P. deltoides. Tree Physiol 1:209–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robison DJ, Raffa KF (1996) Importance of cutting diameter and method of production on early growth of hybrid poplar. Tree Plant Not 47:76–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison DJ, Raffa KF (1998) Productivity, drought tolerance and pest status of hybrid Populus: tree improvement and silvicultural implications. Biomass Bioenerg 14(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robison TL, Rousseau RJ, Zhang J (2006) Biomass productivity improvement for eastern cottonwood. Biomass Bioenerg 30(8–9):735–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockwood DL, Carter DR, Langholtz MH, Stricker JA (2006) Eucalyptus and Populus short rotation woody crops for phosphate mined lands in Florida USA. Biomass Bioenerg 30(8–9):728–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MG, Binkley D, Stape JL (2008) Why don’t our stands grow even faster? Control of production and carbon cycling in Eucalypt plantations. South For 70(2):99–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MG, Stape JL, Binkley D, Fonseca S, Loos RA, Takahashi EN et al (2010) Factors controlling Eucalyptus productivity: how water availability and stand structure alter production and carbon allocation. For Ecol Manag 259:1695–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton B, Eaton J, Johnson J, Rice D, Schuette B, Moser B (2002) Hybrid poplar in the Pacific Northwest. J For 100(4):28–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Stape JL, Binkley D, Ryan MG, Fonseca S, Loos RA, Takasaki EN et al (2010) The Brazil Eucalyptus productivity project: influence of water nutrients, and stand uniformity on wood production. For Ecol Manag 259:1684–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuhlinger HC, Tolliver JR (1985) Variation in rooting ability among selected clones of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr. ex Marsh) in Southern Louisiana. Tree Plant Not 2:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas SC, Weiner J (1989) Including competitive asymmetry in measures of local interference in plant populations. Oecologia 80:349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verwijst T, Lundkvist A, Edelfeldt S, Forkman J, Nordh NE (2012) Effects of clone and cutting traits on shoot emergence and early growth of willow. Biomass Bioenerg 37:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J, Thomas SC (1986) Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos 47:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir D, Gries J (2002) Southern forest resource assessment. USDA Forerst Serv Gen Tech Rep SRS-53, Asheville, NC, p 635

  • Wiese AH, Zalesny JA, Donner DM, Zalesny RS Jr (2006) Bud removal affects shoot, root, and callus development of hardwood Populus cuttings. Silvae Genet 55(3):131–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright LL (1994) Production technology status of woody and herbaceous crops. Biomass Bioenerg 6(3):191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalesny RS, Wiese AH (2006) Date of shoot collection, genotype, and original shoot position affect early rooting of dormant hardwood cuttings of Populus. Silvae Genet 53(4–5):169–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalesny RS, Hall RB, Bauer EO, Riemenschneider DE (2003) Shoot position affects root initiation and growth of dormant unrooted cuttings of Populus. Silvae Genet 52(5–6):273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalesny RS, Bauer EO, Riemenschneider DE (2004) Use of belowground growing degree days to predict rooting of dormant hardwood cuttings of Populus. Silvae Genet 53(4–5):154–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalesny RS, Remenschneider DE, Hall RB (2005) Early rooting of dormant hardwood cuttings of Populus: analysis of quantitative genetics and genotype × environment interactions. Can J For Res 35:918–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was designed and installed while the senior author was a Research Scientist with MWV Forest Research. We thank this organization for their support of this research. Many individuals were instrumental in making this test possible including Keith Byrd, Ana Hahn, Neal Murdaugh, and Jamie Bryan. We would also like to thank ArborGen Corporation for providing access to these data sets and allowing this research to be published. The paper was developed and written with the support and funding provided by the Department of Energy-Savannah River Operations Office through the U.S. Forest Service Savannah River and the Forest Service Southern Research Station. Biomass equations were developed from research and data sets developed at the Savannah River Site.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald J. Kaczmarek.

Additional information

Donald J. Kaczmarek was formerly with the USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 241 Gateway Drive, Aiken, SC 29803, USA.

Brian C. Wachelka was formerly with MeadWestvaco Forest Research, Summerville, SC 29485, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaczmarek, D.J., Rousseau, R.J., Wright, J.A. et al. The influence of alternative plant propagation and stand establishment techniques on survival and growth of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) clones. New Forests 45, 487–506 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9411-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9411-2

Keywords

Navigation