Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The rise of the mediocre forest: why chronically stressed trees may better survive extreme episodic climate variability

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anthropogenic climate change is a relatively new phenomenon, largely occurring over the past 150 years, and much of the discussion on climate change impacts to forests has focused on long-term shifts in temperature and precipitation. However, individual trees respond to the much shorter impacts of climate variability. Historically, fast growing, fully canopied, non-chronically stressed (NCS) trees (e.g., those with minimal insect or disease damage, growing on high nutrient, moist soils), have been considered the model of individual health, while slower growing, broken crown, chronically stressed (CS) trees growing on nutrient poor, or dry soils, were considered to be unhealthy and prone to stress related mortality. Over the coming years and decades, climate variability (e.g., extreme precipitation events, drought, heat waves) is expected to increase. We hypothesize that as the duration, severity and interaction of stress becomes more pronounced under increasing climate variability, seemingly less healthy, CS trees could begin to survive environmental stress better than their traditionally considered healthy, NCS tree counterparts. We further hypothesize that this shift in survivorship will be attributed to tree response to increasingly extreme climate variability at levels not previously observed in recorded history. While NCS trees can better survive historic episodic stress, we hypothesize that CS trees may be better suited to survive the combination of chronic low-level stress, and extreme episodic stress associated with anthropogenic climate change and increasing climate variability. Specifically, morphological differences such as increased root and reduced leaf mass, and physiological differences such as more oleoresin production, could make slower growing, CS forests more resilient to catastrophic episodic mortality compared to more NCS stands under certain circumstances. General circulation models suggest that climate variability will increase in the future. Therefore, the occurrence of slow growth, CS forest stands out surviving faster growing NCS less stressed stands may become more common place, and eventually lead to “The Age of the Mediocre Forest”. This paper addresses the type of environmental conditions that could create such an inverse in forest health conditions, and the implications that this shift might have in forest genetics and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber JD, Nadelhoffer KJ, Steudler P, Melillo JM (1989) Nitrogen saturation in northern forest ecosystems. Bioscience 39:378–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaback PB, Herman FR (1988) Long-term response of understory vegetation to stand density in Picea-Tsuga forests. Can J For Res 18:1522–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen HL, Dougherty PM, Campbell RG (1990) Manipulation of water and nutrients-practice and opportunity in southern U.S. pine forests. For Ecol Manag 30:437–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aukema JE, Carey AB (2008) Effects of variable-density thinning on understory diversity and heterogeneity in young Douglas-fir forests. Research Paper PNW-RP-575. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 20 p

  • Brix H, Mitchell AK (1986) Thinning and nitrogen fertilization effects on soil and tree water stress in a Douglas-fir stand. Can J For Res 16:1334–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavel JR, Julliard S, Devictor V (2011) Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization. Front Ecol 9:222–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran TJ, Gersbach LN, Edwards W, Krockenberger AK (2008) Wood density predicts plant damage and vegetative recovery rates caused by cyclone disturbance in tropical rainforest tree species of North Queensland, Australia. Aust Ecol 33:442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dore MHI (2005) Climate change and changes in global precipitation patterns: what do we know? Env Int 31:1167–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman KW (1976) The genetics and breeding of southern pines. US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 471. Washington, DC. 407 p

  • Dorman KW, Zobel BJ (1973) Genetics of loblolly pine. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper WO-19. Washington, DC. 21 p

  • Dvorak WS (2012) Water use in plantations of eucalypts and pines: a discussion paper from a tree breeding perspective. Int For Rev 14:110–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Finzi AC,  Moore DJP, DeLucia EH, Lichter J, Hofmockel KS, Jackson RB, Kim HS, Matamala R, McCarthy HR, Oren R, Pippen JS, Schlesinger WH (2006) Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem processes under elevated CO2 in a warm-temperate forest.  Ecology 87:15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox TR (2000) Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantations. For Ecol Manag 138:187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegerl GC, Zwiers FW, Braconnot P, Gillett NP, Luo Y, Marengo J, Nicholls N, Penner JE, Stott PA (2007) Understanding and attributing climate change. In: Solomon S et al. (Eds) Climate Change 2007. The Fourth Scientific Assessment, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 663–745

  • International Panel on Climate Change (2007) Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K. and Reisinger, A. (Eds) IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. pp 104)

  • Jayawickrama KJS (2001) Potential genetic gains for carbon sequestration: a preliminary study on radiata pine plantations in New Zealand. For Ecol Manag 152:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson H (1999) The international book of trees. ISBN 9780753700976. Chancellor Press, 288 p

  • Karl TR, Knight RW, Plummer N (1995) Trends in high-frequency climate variability in the twentieth century. Nature 377:217–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (eds) (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempes CP, West GB, Crowell K, Girvan M (2011) Predicting maximum tree heights and other traits from allometric scaling and resource limitations. PLoS ONE 6(6):e20551. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020551

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes CR, O’Hara KL (2002) Quantifying stand targets for silvicultural prevention of crown fires. West J Appl For 17:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleczewski NM, Herms DA, Bonello P (2010) Effects of soil type, fertilization and drought on carbon allocation to root growth and partitioning between secondary metabolism and ectomycorrhizae of Betula papyrifera. Tree Physiol 30:807–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleczewski N, Herms DA, Bonello P (2012) Nutrient and water availability alter belowground patterns of biomass allocation, carbon partitioning, and ectomycorrhizal abundance in Betula nigra. Trees 26:525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson TR, Tuleya RE (2007) Impact of CO2-induced warming on simulated hurricane intensity and precipitation:sensitivity to the choice of climate model and convective parameterization. J Clim 17:3477–3495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kominoski JS, Follstad Shah JJ, Canhoto C, Fischer DG, Giling DP, Gonzalez E, Griffiths NA, Larranaga A, LeRoy CJ, Mineau MM, McElarney YR, Shirley SM, Swan CM, Tiegs SD (2013) Forecasting functional implications of global changes in riparian plant communities. Front Ecol Env 11:423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosiba AM, Schaberg PG, Hawley GJ, Hansen CF (2013) Quantifying the legacy of foliar winter injury on woody aboveground carbon sequestration of red spruce trees. For Ecol Manag 302:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JG, Kloeppel BD, Schaefer TL, Kimbler DL, McNulty SG (1998) Aboveground biomass and nitrogen allocation of ten deciduous southern Appalachian tree species. Can J For Res 28(11):1648–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason R (1971) Soil moisture and stand density affect Oleoresin exudation flow in a Loblolly pine plantation. For Sci 17(2):170–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson W, Haack R (1987) Role of drought in outbreaks of plant-eating insects. Bioscience 37(2):110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell NG, Adams HD, Bailey JD, Kolb TE (2007) The role of stand density on growth efficiency, leaf area index, and resin flow in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Can J For Res 37:343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin SB, Downing DJ, Blasing TJ, Cook ER, Adams HS (1987) An analysis of climate and competition as contributors to decline of red spruce in high elevation Appalachian forests of the Eastern United States. Oecologia 72:487–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty SG, Boggs JL (2010) A conceptual framework: redefining forest soil’s critical acid loads under a changing climate. Environ Pollut 158:2053–2058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty SG, Swank WT (1995) Wood delta 13C as a measure of annual basal area growth and soil water stress in a Pinus strobus forest. Ecology 76:1581–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty SG, Cohen EC, Moore Myers JA, Sullivan TJ, Li H (2007) Estimates of critical acid loads and exceedences for forest soils across the conterminous United States. Env Pollut 149:281–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Climate Data Center. 2014. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html (Last Accessed 30 Jan 2014)

  • Norby RJ, Wullschleger SD, Hanson PJ, Gunderson CA, Tschaplinski TJ, Jastrow JD (2006) CO2 enrichment of a deciduous forest: the Oak Ridge FACE experiment. In: Nösberger J, Long SP, Norby RJ, Stitt M, Hendrey GR, Blum H (eds) Managed ecosystems and CO2: case studies, processes and perspectives. Ecological studies, vol 187. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. pp 231–251

  • Norby RJ, Warren JM, Iversen CM, Medlyn BE (2010) McMurtrie RE (2010) CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:19368–19373

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oren R, Ellsworth DS, Johnsen KH, Liu K, Phillips N, Ewers BE, Maier C, Karina R, Schäfer VR, Hendrey G, McNulty SG, Katul GG (2001) Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in CO2-enriched atmosphere. Nature 411:469–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelkki MH (1999) Impacts of thinning strategies on financial returns from yellow-poplar stands. South J Appl For 23:69–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Penland C, Sun DZ, Capotondi A, Vimont DJ (2010) A brief introduction to El Niño and La Niña. Chapter 3 in Climate Dynamics: Why does Climate Vary? Geoph Monog Series 189:53–64. doi:10.1029/2008GM000846

  • Silver T (2007) Mount Mitchell and the Black Mountains: an environmental history of the highest peaks in Eastern America. University of North Carolina Press. 352 pp

  • Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere (SAMAB) (1996) The Southern Appalachian Asssessment terrestrial technical report. Report 5 of 5. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Region, 248 pp

  • Sullivan J (1993) Picea rubens. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2013, 15 March]

  • Sun G, Caldwell P, Noormets A, McNulty SG, Cohen E, Moore Myers J, Domec JC, Treasure E, Mu Q, Xiao J, Ranjeet J, Chen J (2011) Upscaling key ecosystem functions across the conterminous United States by a water-centric ecosystem model, J Geophys Res 16:G00J05. doi:10.1029/2010JG001573

  • Sutton B (2002) Commercial delivery of genetic improvement to conifer plantations using somatic embryogenesis. Ann For Sci 59:657–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson I, Mackey B, McNulty S, Mosseler A (2009) Forest resilience, biodiversity, and Climate Change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Secretariat of the convention on biological diversity, Montreal. Technical Series No. 43. 67 p

  • Urban J, Holušová K, Menšík L, Čermák J, Kantor P (2013) Tree allometry of Douglas fir and Norway spruce on a nutrient-poor and a nutrient-rich site. Trees 27:97–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Howarth RW (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea–how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13:87–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakeley Philip C, Bercaw TE (1965) Loblolly pine provenance test at age 35. J For 63:168–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells 00 (1969) Results of the southwide pine seed source study through 1968–69. In proceedings, tenth southern forest tree improvement conference, pp 117–129

  • White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB (2007) Forest genetics-concepts, scope, history and importance. In: Forest Genetics (Eds. White TL, Adams WT., and Neale DB.). CABI publisher. Wallingford, UK, pp 1–14

  • Zobel BJ, Jett JB (1995) Genetics of wood production. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 337 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by the USDA Forest Service Eastern Environmental Threat Assessment Center. The authors wish to thank Robert Doudrick and Hermann Gucinski for assistance in field work, and Eric Ward and two anonymous reviewers for helping to refine the theory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven G. McNulty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

G. McNulty, S., L. Boggs, J. & Sun, G. The rise of the mediocre forest: why chronically stressed trees may better survive extreme episodic climate variability. New Forests 45, 403–415 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9410-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9410-3

Keywords

Navigation