Skip to main content
Log in

Kalman Filtering-Based Approach for Project Valuation of an Iron Ore Mining Project Through Spot Price and Long-Term Commitment Contracts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Iron ore was traditionally traded using long-term commitment (LTC) contracts. In the last decade, with the surging demand from China, a futures market was created for iron ore. In this paper, using historical information from this futures market, we focus on modeling market dynamics of Iron Fine 62% Fe—CFR Tianjin Port (China) futures contracts to determine optimal parameter values of the Schwartz (J Financ 52:923–973, 1997) two-factor model. A new approach using LTC and futures contracts is proposed to assess the Net Present Value (NPV) of an iron ore mining project. We apply Kalman filtering techniques to calibrate the two-factor commodity model to iron ore futures for the January 2014–November 2016 period. The Kalman filter is useful to infer unobservable variables from noisy measurements. In the Schwartz (1997) two-factor model, the unobservable spot price and convenience yield are inferred from futures contracts transactions. Model parameters are fitted using maximum likelihood optimization. Using parameters derived from the Kalman filtering and the maximum likelihood approach, spot price simulations for the next 7 years are made for three scenarios. The NPV of a mining project is calculated for each scenario. Then, both LTC and futures markets are treated separately and the mining company can choose which proportion of its production to sell in each market. Results show that the calibration and NPV simulation workflow can be effectively used to assess the profitability of a mining project, accounting for the exposure to futures markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiube, F. A. L., & Samanez, C. P. (2014). On the comparison of Schwartz and Smith’s two- and three-factor models on commodity prices. Applied Economics, 46, 3736–3749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astier, J. (2015). Evolution of iron ore prices. Mineral Economics, 28, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, D., & Miffre, J. (2013). Capturing the risk premium of commodity futures: The role of hedging pressure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 2652–2664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertisen, J., & Davis, G. A. (2008). Bias and error in mine project capital cost estimation. The Engineering Economist, 53, 118–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. J., & Schwartz, E. S. (1985). Evaluating natural resource investments. Journal of Business, 58, 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Mercantile Exchange. (2015). Futures and options trading for risk management. Retrieved January 4, 2017 from www.cmegroup.com.

  • Erb, P., Luethi, D., Hinz, J., & Otziger, S. (2014). schwartz97: A package on the Schwartz two-factor commodity model. R package version 0.0.6.

  • Geman, H. (2009). Commodities and commodity derivatives: Modeling and pricing for agriculturals, metals and energy. The Wiley finance series. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., & Schwartz, E. S. (1990). Stochastic convenience yield and the pricing of oil contingent claims. The Journal of Finance, 45(3), 959–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, M. A., Topal, E., & Lilford, E. (2015). Iron ore prices and the value of the Australian dollar. Mining Technology, 124, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, A., Topal, E., & Lilford, E. (2016). Estimation of mining project values through real option valuation using a combination of hedging strategy and a mean reversion commodity price. Natural Resources Research, 25, 459–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. C. (1990). Forecasting, structural time series models and the Kalman filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, L. (2015). Assessing the competitiveness of the supply side response to China’s iron ore demand shock. Resources Policy, 45, 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • marketrealist.com. (2015). China’s steel production is greatly influencing iron ore prices.

  • Masteika, S., Rutkauskas, A. V., & Alexander, J. A. (2012). Continuous futures data series for back testing and technical analysis. In Conference proceedings, 3rd international conference on financial theory and engineering (Vol. 29, pp. 265–269).

  • McTaggart, R., Daroczi, G., & Leung, C. (2015). Quandl: API Wrapper for Quandl.com. R package version 2.7.0.

  • Nejadi, S., Trivedi, J., & Leung, J. Y. (2015). Estimation of facies boundaries using categorical indicators with P-Field simulation and ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). Natural Resources Research, 24, 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman, J., & Jafari, Y. (2012). Accounting for depletion of oil and gas resources in Malaysia. Natural Resources Research, 21, 483–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patiño Douce, A. E. (2016). Metallic mineral resources in the twenty-first century: II. Constraints on future supply. Natural Resources Research, 25, 97–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platts. (2016). The Steel Index. Retrieved September 28, 2016 from https://www.thesteelindex.com.

  • R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing

  • Ribeiro, D. R. & Hodges, S. D. (2004). A two-factor model for commodity prices and futures valuation. EFMA 2004 Basel Meetings Paper.

  • Rogers, C. D., & Robertson, K. (1987). Long term contracts and market stability: The case of iron ore. Resources Policy, 13, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudenno, V. (1998). The mining valuation handbook. Elsternwick: Wrightbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E. S. (1997). The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: Implications for valuation and hedging. The Journal of Finance, 52, 923–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E., & Smith, J. E. (2000). Short-term variations and long-term dynamics in commodity prices. Management Science, 46, 893–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. (2015). Weekly commitment of traders reports. Retrieved March 16, 2016 from www.cftc.gov.

  • Wilson, J. D. (2012). Chinese resource security policies and the restructuring of the Asia-Pacific iron ore market. Resources Policy, 37, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K., & Kleit, A. N. (2016). Mining rate optimization considering the stockpiling—A theoretical economics and real option model. Resources Policy, 47, 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K., Nieto, A., & Kleit, A. N. (2014). The real option value of mining operations using mean-reverting commodity prices. Mineral Economics, 28, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for support (Project No. 435661).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Kumral.

Appendix

Appendix

Let \({y_1},\ldots ,{y_T}\) be a set of independent and identically distributed observations. The joint density function is given by (Harvey 1990):

$$\begin{aligned} L(y;\psi ) = \prod \limits _{t = 1}^T {p({y_t}|{Y_{t - 1}})} \end{aligned}$$
(18)

where \({p({y_t}|{Y_{t - 1}})}\) is the conditional distribution of \(y_t\) knowing all available information at time \(t-1\). The measurement equation of the Kalman filter can be written as:

$$\begin{aligned} {y_t} = {Z_t}{a_t}_{|t - 1} + {Z_t}\left( {\alpha _t} - {a_t}_{|t - 1}\right) + {d_t} + {\varepsilon _t} \end{aligned}$$
(19)

The conditional distribution of \(y_t\) is normal with a mean:

$$\begin{aligned} E({y_t}) = {Z_t}{a_t}_{|t - 1} + {d_t} \end{aligned}$$
(20)

and a covariance matrix given by:

$$\begin{aligned} {F_t} = {Z_t}{P_{t|t - 1}}Z_t' + {H_t} \end{aligned}$$
(21)

For a Gaussian model, the likelihood function can be written as:

$$\begin{aligned} \hbox {Log}\,L = - \frac{{NT}}{2}\log (2\pi ) - \frac{1}{2}\sum \nolimits _{t = 1}^T {\log |{F_t}|} - \frac{1}{2}\sum \limits _{t = 1}^T {\nu 'F_t^{ - 1}} {v_t} \end{aligned}.$$
(22)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sauvageau, M., Kumral, M. Kalman Filtering-Based Approach for Project Valuation of an Iron Ore Mining Project Through Spot Price and Long-Term Commitment Contracts. Nat Resour Res 26, 303–317 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-017-9329-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-017-9329-4

Keywords

Navigation