Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Proportions in time: interactions of quantification and aspect

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Proportional quantification and progressive aspect interact in English in revealing ways. This paper investigates these interactions and draws conclusions about the semantics of the progressive and telicity. In the scope of the progressive, the proportion named by a proportionality quantifier (e.g. most in The software was detecting most errors) must hold in every subevent of the event so described, indicating that a predicate in the scope of the progressive is interpreted as an internally homogeneous activity. Such an activity interpretation is argued to be available for telic predicates (e.g. cross the street) because these receive a partitive interpretation except in combination with a completive operator, which asserts that the event so described has culminated. The obligatoriness of the completive operator in the preterit is shown to parametrically distinguish those languages that show completion entailments in the preterit, e.g. English, from those that do not, e.g. Malagasy, Hindi, and Japanese.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher Nicholas. (1992) A default, truth conditional semantics for the progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 463–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. 1950. Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary vol. 24: 111–128.

  • Bach Emmon. (1986) The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise Jon, John Perry. (1983) Situations and attitudes. CSLI, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, Filippo. 1993. A minimalist approach to quantifier scope. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 23, vol. 1, ed. Amy Schafer, 65–80. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.

  • Beghelli, Filippo, and Tim Stowell. 1997. Distributivity and negation: The syntax of each and every. In Ways of scope taking, ed. Anna Szabolcsi, 71–107. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Bennett, Michael, and Barbara Partee. 1978. Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

  • Berman, Stephen. 1987. Situation-based semantics for adverbs of quantification. In Studies in semantics: University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics, vol 12, ed. James Blevins and Anne Vainikka, 46–68. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.

  • Chung Sandra. (1994) Wh-agreement and ‘referentiality’ in Chamorro. Linguistic inquiry 25: 1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipria Alicia, Craige Roberts. (2000). Spanish imperfecto and pretérito: Truth conditions and aktionsart effects in a situation semantics. Natural Language Semantics 8: 297–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin. 1996. The role of situations in generalized quantifiers. In The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, ed. Shalom Lappin, 65–86. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Cooper, Robin. 1997. Austinian propositions, Davidsonian events and perception complements. In The Tbilisi symposium on language, logic and computation: Selected papers, ed. Jonathan Ginzburg, Zurab Khasidashvili, Carl Vogel, Jean-Jacques Lévy and Enric Vallduví, 19–34. Stanford: CSLI.

  • Cresswell, M. J. 1977. Interval semantics and logical words. In On the logical analysis of tense and aspect, ed. Christian Rohrer, 7–29. Tübingen: TBL Verlag.

  • Declerck Renaat. (1979) Aspect and the bounded/unbounded (telic/atelic) distinction. Linguistics 17: 761–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesing Molly. (1992) Indefinites. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty David. (1977) Toward a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English ‘imperfective’ progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 45–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty David. (1979) Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty David. (1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbourne Paul. (2005) Situations and individuals. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç Mürvet. (1991) The semantics of specificity. Linguistic inquiry 22: 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawron Jean Mark, Peters Stanley (1990) Quantification and anaphora in situation semantics. CSLI, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, Brendan. 2008. Implicit arguments: a dilemma for model theoretic semantics. Manuscript, McGill University.

  • Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Heim Irene. (1990) E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 137–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, Erhard. 1983 . Semantics of the English progressive: A study in situation semantics. In Papers from the 19th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, ed. Amy Chukerman, Mitchell Marks, and John F. Richardson, 171–182. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.

  • Ioup, Georgette. 1975. Some universals for quantifier scope. In Syntax and semantics, vol. 4, ed. John Kimball, 37–58. New York: Academic Press.

  • Jackendoff Ray. (1983) Semantics and cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff Ray. (1987) The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic inquiry 18: 369–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff Ray. (1990) Semantic structures. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans. 1984. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Truth, interpretation and information, ed. Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo M. V. Janssen and Martin Stokhof, 1–41. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

  • Kenny Arthur. (1963) Actions, emotions and will. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss Katalin. (1993) Wh-movement and specificity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 85–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward, and Dag Westerståhl. 1997. Generalized quantifiers in linguistics and logic. In Handbook of logic and language, ed. Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, 837–893. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Partitive case and aspect. In The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, ed. William Geuder and Miriam Butt, 265–307. Stanford: CSLI.

  • Kratzer Angelika (1989) An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy: 12: 607–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika 1998. Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In Events and grammar, ed. Susan Rothstein, 163–196. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Kratzer Angelika. (2002) Facts: Particulars or information units?. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 655–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 2004. Telicity and the meaning of objective case. In The syntax of time, ed. Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme, 389–423. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 2008. Situations in natural language semantics. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2008 edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. URL = < http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2008/entries/situations-semantics/>.

  • Krifka, Manfred. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical matters, ed. Ivan Sag and Anna Szabolcsi, 29–53. Standford: CSLI.

  • Krifka, Manfed. 1998. The origins of telicity. In Events and grammar, ed. Susan Rothstein, 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Landman Fred. (1992). The progressive. Natural Language Semantics: 1: 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lascarides Alex. (1991) The progressive and the imperfective paradox. Synthese 87: 401–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn Peter. (1990) A semantics for groups and events. Garland Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech Geoffrey. (1971) Meaning and the English verb. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis David. (1968) Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic. Journal of Philosophy 65: 113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis David. (1971) Counterparts of persons and their bodies. Journal of Philosophy 68: 203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis David. (1973) Counterfactuals. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis David. (1986) On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard. 1987. Algebraic semantics of event structures. In Proceedings of the 6th Amsterdam colloquium, ed. Jereon Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof and Frank Veltman, 243–262. Amsterdam: ITLI.

  • Mahajan Anoop. (1992) The specificity condition and CED. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 510–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittwoch Anita. (1988) Aspects of English aspect: On the interaction of perfect, progressive and durational phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 203–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann Friedericke. (1991) Measure adverbials. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 629–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons Terrance. (1990) Events in the semantics of English. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The representation of (in)definiteness, ed. Eric Reuland and Alice ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  • Portner, Paul. 1992. Situation theory and the semantics of propositional expressions. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Portner Paul. (1998) The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74: 760–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramchand Gillian. (1997) Aspect and predication: The semantics of argument structure. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasolofo, Andoveloniaina. 2006. Malagasy transitive clause types and their functions. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oregon.

  • Recanati François. (1996) Domains of discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 445–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Saurer Werner. (1984) A formal semantics of tense, aspect and aktionsarten. University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh Mona. (1998) On the semantics of the perfective aspect. Natural Language Semantics 6: 171–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi Anna, Zwarts Frans (1992) Weak islands and algebraic semantics. Natural Language Semantics 1: 235–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor Barry. (1977) Tense and continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 199–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenny Carol. (1994) Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Meulen, Alice. 1983. The representation of time in natural language. In Studies in modeltheoretic semantics, ed. Alice ter Meulen, 177–191. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • ter Meulen, Alice. 1985. Progressives without possible worlds. In Papers from the regional meetings, Chicago Linguistic Society, 408–423. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  • ter Meulen, Alice. 1987. Incomplete Events. In Proceedings of the 6th Amsterdam colloquium, ed. Jereon Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof and Frank Veltman, 263–279. Amsterdam: ITLI.

  • Travis, Lisa. 2000. Event structure in syntax. In Events as grammatical objects, ed. Carol Tenny and James Pustejovsky, 145–185. Stanford: CSLI.

  • Vendler Zeno. (1957) Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66: 143–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlach, Frank. 1981. The semantics of the progressive. In Syntax and semantics 15: Tense and aspect, ed. Philip Tedeschi and Annie Zaenen, 271–292. New York: Academic Press.

  • von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on quantifier domains. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • von Fintel, Kai. 2004. A minimal theory of adverbial quantification. In Context dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning, ed. Hans Kamp and Barbara Partee, 137–175. Amsterdam: Elseveier.

  • Zucchi Alessandro. (1993) The language of propositions and events. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucchi Sandro. (1999) Incomplete events, intensionality, and imperfective aspect. Natural Language Semantics 7: 179–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucchi Sandro, White Michael (2001) Twigs, sequences and the temporal constitution of predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 223–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, UCLA, 3125 Campbell Hall, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1543, USA

    Peter Hallman

Authors
  1. Peter Hallman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Hallman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hallman, P. Proportions in time: interactions of quantification and aspect. Nat Lang Semantics 17, 29–61 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-008-9038-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-008-9038-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation