Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the Korean suffix -te, which has been variously analyzed as a marker of tense, aspect, tense–aspect, mood, mood–tense, or evidentiality. I argue against all of these approaches and propose instead that -te is a spatial deictic past tense, which triggers an evidential environment. It refers to a certain past time when the speaker either observed an event or some evidence of the event within his (her) perceptual field. Thus, the denotation of -te is ‘overlap’, not between the speaker's perceptual field and the event itself, but between the speaker's perceptual field and the evidence of the event at the past reference time. To account for this denotation, propose an ‘evidence trace’ function as well as a ‘speaker's perceptual trace’ function (cf. M. Faller, J Semantics 21:45–85, 2004). My analysis shows that suffixes like -ess (which is traditionally analyzed as a perfect) play two roles, as an indirect evidential and a perfect, depending on whether they appear with the spatial deictic tense -te or with a simple deictic tense. I argue that in Korean two distinct tense systems—the regular tense–aspect system and the spatial deictic tense–evidential system—exist in parallel. Thus the proposed analysis allows evidentials to be subsumed under the formal theory of tense, aspect, and mood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikhenvald A.Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksu-Koç A.A., Slobin D.I. (1986). A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In: Chafe W., Nichols J. (eds). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing Corp, pp. 150–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson L.B. (1986). Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In; Chafe W., Nichols J. (eds). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing Corp, pp. 173–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang K.-H. (1985). Hyentay Kwukeuy Yangsang-Pemcwu Yenkwu (A study of modality categories in Modern Korean). Seoul, Tower Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi H.-B. (1983). Wuli Malbon (Our grammar) (10th ed). Seoul, Chungumsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi D.-J. (1994). On the meaning of the pre-final {-te-} in Modern Korean: In the case of sentence-final position. Language Research, 30(1): 41–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi S.-J. (1995). The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. In: Bybee J., Fleishman S. (eds). Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 165–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung K.-S. (2004) The Korean suffix -te as spatio-temporal deictic tense. In: Chand V. et al. (eds) Proceedings of the WCCFL 23. Somerville MA, Cascadilla Press, pp. 140–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K.-S. (2005). Space in tense: The interaction of tense, aspect, evidentiality, and speech act in Korean. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.

  • Chung K.-S. (2006a). The Korean suffix -ess: The perfect and the indirect evidential. In: Kuno S. et al. (eds). Harvard studies in Korean inguistics 11. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, pp. 401–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung K.-S. (2006b). Toward an integrated theory of the perfect and the indirect evidential. In: Davis C., Deal A.R., Zabbal Y. (eds). Proceedings of NELS 36. Amherst, GLSA University of Massachusetts, pp. 217–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung K.-S. (2006c). Korean evidentials and assertion’. In: Baumer D., Montero D., Scanlon M. (eds). Proceedings of WCCFL 25. Somerville, MA, Cascadilla Press, pp. 105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLancey S. (2001). The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faller M. (2004). The deictic core of ‘non-experienced past’ in Cuzco Quechua. Journal of Semantics, 21, 45–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett E. (2000). Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. University of California, Los Angeles, PhD Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Gim C.-K. (1980). Kuwkesice Hyengtaysouy Uymi: Hoysang Hyengtaysolul Cuwngsimulo (The semantics of Korean tense morphemes: With focus on the retrospective morpheme -te-). Han-Geul, 169, 45–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi A., Pianesi F. (1997). Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Givón T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction. Amsterdam, John Benjamins

    Google Scholar 

  • Han D.-W. (1996). Kuwkeuy Sicey Yenkuw (A study on Korean tense). Seoul, Kuwkehakhoy, Taehaksa

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston R. (1977). The futurate construction, Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 730–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Im H.-B. (1982). Senemal -Te-Wa Tanceluy Yangsang (The pre-final -te-and the modality of discontinuity). Kwanak Emwun Yenkwu, 7, 433–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Im H.-B. (1993). Kuwkeuy Sicey Yenkuw (A study on Korean tense). Kwukehak, 23, 255–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Izvorski R. (1997). The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In: Lawson A., Cho E. (eds). Proceedings of SALT 7. Ithaca, NY, CLC Publications, pp. 222–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-J. (1990). The syntax and semantics of Korean case: The interaction between lexical and semantic levels of representation. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Kim S.-W., Maling J. (1993). Syntactic case and frequency adverbials in Korean. In: Kuno S., Whitman J., Kang Y.-S. (eds). Harvard studies in Korean linguistics 5. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, pp. 368–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer A. (1998). More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In: Strolovitch D., Lawson A. (eds). Proceedings of SALT. Ithaca NY, CLC Publications, pp. 92–3110

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazard, G. (1999). Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other?. Linguistic Typology, 3, 91–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H.-S. (1991). Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological erspective. University of California, Los Angeles, PhD Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H.-S. (1993a). The temporal system of noun-modifying (attributive) clauses in Korean from a typological perspective. Studies in Language, 17, 75–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H.-S. (1993b). Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information: With reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 135–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K.-D. (1993). A Korean grammar on semantic-pragmatic principles. Seoul, Hankuk Munhwasa

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson L. (2006). Temporal semantics in a supposedly tenseless language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29, 673–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam K.-S. (1978). Kwuke Mwunpepuy Sicemwunceyey Kwanhan Yenkwu (A study of Korean tense phenomena). Seoul, Top Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols J. (1986). The bottom line: Chinese Pidgin Russian. In: Chafe W., Nichols J. (eds). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of pistemology. Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing Corp, pp. 239–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. New York, The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichter A. (1986). The origins and deictic nature of Wintu evidentials. In: Chafe W., Nichols J. (eds). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing Corp, pp. 46–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaer, B. (1996). Making sense of tense: Tense, time reference, and linking theory. PhD Dissertation, McGill University.

  • Smith C.S. (1997). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn H.-M. (1975). Retrospection in Korean. Language Research, 11, 87–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn H.-M. (1994). Korean. London, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Speas M., Tenny C. (2003). Configurational properties of point of view roles. In: Di Scuillo A.M. (eds). Asymmetry in grammar, Vol. 1: Syntax and semantics. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 315–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh C.-S. (1977). -Te-Nun Hoysanguy Kinungul Kacinunka? Congkyelpepkwa Inyongpepuy -Te-Lul Cwungsimulo (Does -te-have a retrospective function? Focusing on the sentence-final -te-and the -te-in quotations). Ene (Linguistic Journal of Korea), 2, 97–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh C.-S. (1996). Kwuke Mwunpep (A Korean grammar). Seoul, Hanyang University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl H., Zwarts J. (1992). Time and space in conceptual and logical semantics: The notion path. Utrecht, OTS

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett T. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12, 51–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang I.-S. (1972). Korean syntax: Case markers, delimiters, complementation, and relativization. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, PhD Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu D.-S. (1981). -Te-uy Uymiey Tayhan Kwankyen (A view on the semantics of -te-). Kwanak Emwun Yenkwu, 6, 205–226

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr., Burnaby, BC, Canada, V5A 1S6

    Kyung-Sook Chung

Authors
  1. Kyung-Sook Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung-Sook Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, KS. Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean. Nat Lang Semantics 15, 187–219 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9017-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9017-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation