Abstract
In this commentary on Anderson and Morzycki’s article ‘Degrees as kinds’, I raise some issues about the interchangeability of concrete (or Davidsonian) states (in the sense of Maienborn 2007) and tropes (particularized properties, according to Moltmann 2009), as well as the category of concrete states as such. I will also raise some issues for Anderson and Morzycki’s use of kinds of concrete states for constructing degrees and their analysis of the comparative.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There are a number of verbs that allow for both an eventive and an abstract-state interpretation and thus pattern in both ways, for example surround, obstruct or threaten (Rothmayr 2009). Moreover, adverbials may become acceptable with abstract state verbs on a derivative interpretation (Maienborn 2007).
Note that the trope-based account of positive and comparative adjectives in Moltmann (2009) does not deny reference to degrees as such. Rather the claim is that degrees are not involved in the semantics of constructions not involving explicit reference to them.
Not all adjective nominalizations simply pick up the trope arguments of the adjective. Length and width do; but tallness and heaviness describe more complex tropes quasi-relational tropes which instantiate the property of being greater than the contextual standard in a height trope or weight trope (Moltmann 2009).
References
Campbell, Keith. 1990. Abstract particulars. Oxford: Blackwell.
D. Davidson. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In The logic of decision and action, ed. N. Rescher. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Katz, Graham. 2003. Event arguments, adverb selection, and the stative adverb gap. In Modifying adjuncts, eds. Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn, and Catherine Fabricius-Hansen, 455–474. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kim, Jaegwon. 1976. Events as property exemplifications. In The Winnipeg conference on human action, eds. Myles Brand and Douglas Walton, 159–177. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Lowe, Edward Jonathan. 2006. The four-category ontology: a metaphysics foundation for natural science. London: Oxford University Press.
Maienborn, Claudia. 2005. On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: the case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 31(3): 275–316.
Maienborn, Claudia. 2007. On Davidsonian and Kimian states. In Existence: semantics and syntax, eds. Ileana Comorovski and Klaus von Heusinger, 107–130. New York: Springer.
Moltmann, Friederike. 2007. Events, tropes and truthmaking. Philosophical Studies 134: 363–403.
Moltmann, Friederike. 2009. Degree structure as trope structure. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(1): 51–94.
Moltmann, Friederike. 2013a. Reference to numbers in natural language. Philosophical Studies 162(3): 499–534.
Moltmann, Friederike 2013b. Abstract objects and the semantics of natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rothmayr, Antonia. 2009. The structure of stative verbs. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Williams, Donald Cary. 1953. On the elements of being. The Review of Metaphysics 7: 3–18.
Woltersdorff, Nicholas. 1970. On universals. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moltmann, F. States versus tropes. Comments on Curt Anderson and Marcin Morzycki: ‘Degrees as kinds’. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 33, 829–841 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9292-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9292-x