Skip to main content
Log in

Acquisition of the Malagasy voicing system: implications for the adult grammar

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the acquisition of the voicing system of Malagasy, an Austronesian language. Our study is based on the longitudinal data of three children ages 19–32 months, and is to our knowledge the first systematic investigation of the acquisition of Malagasy. The Malagasy voicing system has a distinctive morphology and involves the promotion of an argument (actor, theme, instrument, etc.) to a referentially and syntactically prominent position, typically clause-final. We look at two competing accounts of the Malagasy voicing system, one in which the promoted argument is analyzed as a subject and the promotion operation an instance of A-movement [Guilfoyle, E., Hung, H., & Travis, L. (1992) Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10, 375–414] and a more recent account in which Malagasy is analyzed as a V2-like language in which the promoted argument is a topic and the promotion an instance of A′-movement (Pearson, M. (2001) Pearson, M. (2005)). Both analyses have clear implications for acquisition, which we examine in this paper. Our acquisition results favor the analysis of the promoted argument as an A′-element. We also show that there is a developmental stage in Malagasy that parallels the root infinitive (RI) stage widely observed in various European languages. Apparent differences between the Germanic RIs and the analogous phenomenon in Malagasy are derived from differences in the functional structure associated with a voicing system as opposed to an agreement system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen S., Crago M. (1996). Early passive acquisition in Inuktitut. Journal of Child Language, 23:129–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbot-Smith, K., & Behrens, H. (2005). How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: The German passive and future constructions. ms., Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and University of Groningen.

  • Babyonyshev M., Ganger J., Pesetsky D., Wexler K. (2001). The maturation of grammatical principles: Evidence from Russian unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 32:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker M. (1988). Theta theory and the syntax of applicatives in chichewa. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6:353–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett-Keach C. (1986). Word internal evidence from Swahili for AUX/INFL. Linguistic Inquiry, 17:559–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker M. (2005). Raising, control and the subset principle. In: Alderete J., Han C., Kochetov A. (eds) Proceedings of the 24th West Coast conference on formal linguistics, (pp. 52–60). Cascadilla Press, Somerville MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. (To appear). There began to be a learnability problem. Linguistic Inquiry.

  • Becker M., Hyams N. (2000). Modal reference in children’s root infinitives. In: Clark E. (eds) Proceedings of the thirtieth annual child language research forum, (pp. 113–122). CSLI, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger-Morales, J., Salustri, M., & Gilkerson, J. (To appear). Root infinitives in the spontaneous speech of two bilingual children: Evidence for separate grammatical systems. In J. Cohen et al. (Eds.), ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium of Bilingualism (pp. 296–305). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

  • Bever T.G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In: Hayes D. (ed) Cognition and the development of language. (pp. 279–362). John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, E. (2003). From root infinitive to finite sentence. unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam/LOT.

  • Borer H., Wexler K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In: Roeper T., Williams E. (eds) Parameter setting (pp. 123–172). D. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Boser K. (1997). The acquisition of word order knowledge in early child German: Interactions between syntax and pragmatics. unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, A. (1995). Der Erwerb des Passivs: Sprach- und Lernbarkeitstheoretische Betrachtungen zum Englischen und Deutsche. unpublished Ph.D. disseratation, Neuphilogische Fakultäat, Universitäat Tübingen.

  • Buell, L. (2002). Swahili Amba-less Relatives without Head Movement. In H. Torrence (Ed.), UCLA working papers in linguistics (Vol. 8, pp. 86–106).

  • Builles, J.-M. (1988). La Voix Agento-Stative en Malgache. In Etudes d’Ocean Indien (Vol. 9). Paris, INALCO.

  • Chien Y.C., Wexler K. (1990). Children’s knowledge of locality principles in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1:225–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1999). Derivation by phase MIT occasional papers in linguistics (Vol 18). Cambridge, MA MITWPL

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung S. (1998). The designs of agreement: Evidence from Chamorro. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen H., Penke M. (1992). The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New Evidence on German child language from the Simone Corpus. In: Meisel J.M. (ed) The acquisition of verb placement, functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition (pp. 181–223). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14:597–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain S., Pietroski P. (2001). Nature, nurture and universal grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24:139–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. (2004). An adversity analysis of Sesotho child passives: Reanalyzing a counterexample to maturation. poster presentation at GALANA I, University of Hawaii, Honolulu/Manoa.

  • de Haan G. J., Tuijnman K. (1988). Missing subjects and objects in child grammar. In: Jordens P., Lalleman J. (eds) Language development (pp. 101–122). Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Deen K.U. (2005). The acquisition of Swahili. J. Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuth K. (1989). Maturation and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Language, 65:56–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djurkovic, M. (2005). Structural vs. frequency effects in L1 acquisition of the passive and impersonal in Serbian. Paper presented at the 27th conference on Germanic linguistics, Workshop on frequency effects in language acquisition.

  • Felix S. (1980). Cognition and language development: A German child’s acquisition of question words. In: Nehls D. (ed) Studies in language acquisition (pp. 91–109). Gross, Heidelber

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox D., Grodzinsky Y. (1998). Children’s passive: a view from the by-Phrase. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(2):311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, N., & Speas, M. (1986). Specifiers and projection. In N. Fukui et al. (Eds.), MIT working papers in linguistics (Vol. 8, pp. 128–172). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL,

  • Gerken L.A. (1994). A metrical template account of children’s weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words. Journal of Child Language, 21:565–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky Y., Reinhart T. (1993). The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry, 24:69–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasti M.T. (1993/1994). Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: Finite and non-finite verbs. Language Acquisition, 3(1):1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasti M.T. (1999). An excursion into interrogatives in early English and Italian. In: Friedemann M.-A., Rizzi L. (eds) The acquisition of syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics. Longman, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilfoyle E., Hung J., Travis L. (1992). Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10:375–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman L. (1995). Root infinitives, tense, and truncated structures in Dutch. Language Acquisition, 4:205–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann C., Plunkett B. (1998). Subjectless sentences in Danish. Cognition, 69:35–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris T., Wexler K. (1996). The optional-infinitive stage in child English. In: Clahsen H. (ed) Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 1–42). John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, T. (1987). The early acquisition of Irish: Grammatical patterns and the role of formula. unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Reading.

  • Hirsch, C., & Wexler, K. (To appear). Who seems to rescue raising. In Proceeding of generative approaches to language acquisition-North American (GALANA). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.

  • Hoekstra, T., & Hyams, N. (1997). Agreement and the finiteness of V2. Evidence from child language. In A. Greenhill et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of BUCLD 21 (pp. 360–373).

  • Hoekstra T., Hyams N. (1998). Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua, 106:81–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper P.J., Thompson S.A. (1980). ‘Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56:251–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan D. (1978). The development of the full passive. Journal of Child Language, 5:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Hseieh L., Leonard B., Swanson L. (1999). Some differences between English plural noun inflections and third person singular verb inflections in the input: The contributions of frequency, sentence position and duration. Journal of Child Language, 26:31–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C.-T.J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15:531–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, H. (1988). The structure of derived nouns and verbs in Malagasy: A syntactic account, ms., McGill University.

  • Hyams, N. (1983). The acquisition of parameterized grammars. Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate Center/City University of New York.

  • Hyams N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. D. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams N. (1992). The genesis of clausal structure. In: Meisel J.M. (ed) The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition (pp. 371–400). Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams N. (2002). Clausal structure in child Greek. The Linguistic Review, 19:225–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyams, N. (2005). Aspectual effects on interpretation in early grammar. ms., UCLA.

  • Ingram D., Thompson W. (1996). Early syntactic acquisition in German: Evidence for the modal hypothesis. Language, 72:97–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli O. (1986). Passive. Linguistic Inquiry, 17:587–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns A. (1992). Deriving ergativity. Linguistic Inquiry, 21:57–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Josefsson G. (2002). The use and function of non-finite root clauses in Swedish child language. Language Acquisition, 10:273–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E.L. (1976). Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In: Li C. (ed) Subject and topic, (pp. 249–301). Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan Edward L. (1995). Predicate-Argument Structures in Malagasy’. In: Burgess C. et al. (eds) Grammatical Relations. CSLI, Stanford, pp. 171–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E.L., Manorohanta C. (2001). A quantitative study of voice in Malagasy. Oceanic Linguistics, 40:67–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. L., & Manorohanta, C. (2004). Malagasy clause structure and language acquisition. Paper presented at AFLA XI, Berlin, April (2004)

  • Keenan E.L., Polinsky M. (1998). Malagasy (Austronesian). In: Spencer A., Zwicky A. (eds) The handbook of morphology, (pp. 563–623). Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. (1982). Syntactic theory and the developing grammar: Reestablishing the relationship between linguistic theory and data from language acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.

  • Kitagawa, Y. (1986). Subjects in Japanese and English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Koopman H., Sportiche D. (1991). The position of subjects. Lingua, 85:211–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, I. (1993). The licensing of subjects in early child language. In MITWPL, (Vol. 19, pp. 197–212). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

  • Kratzer, A. (2000). Building statives. In L. Conathan et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Berkeley linguistics society (Vol. 26, pp. 385–399).

  • Kuczaj A.S. (1979). Evidence for a language learning strategy: On the relative ease of acquisition of prefixes and suffixes. Child Development, 50:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda S.-Y. (1988). Whether we agree or not. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 12:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Londe, Z. C. (2004). The Hungarian case of root infinitives: Too many cases no place for root infinitives, ms., UCLA.

  • Maratsos M., Kuczaj S., Fox D., Chalkley M.A. (1985). Semantic restrictions on children’s early passives. Cognition, 19:167–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meints K. (1999). Prototypes and the acquisition of passives. In: Kokinov B. (ed) Perspectives on cognitive science (Vol. 4). Sofia, NBU Press, pp. 67–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel J.M., Müller N. (1992). Finiteness and verb placement in early child grammars: Evidence from simultaneous acquisition of French and German in Bilinguals. In: Meisel J. (ed) The acquisition of verb placement: functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, (pp. 109–138). Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills A.E. (1985). The acquisition of german. In: Slobin D.I. (ed) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Volume 1: The data (pp. 141–254). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithun M. (1989). The acquisition of polysynthesis. Journal of Child Language, 16:285–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murasugi K. (2000). Bunpoo Kakutoku: Idou Gensyoo-o Tyuusin Tosite (The Acquisition of Grammar with Special Reference to Movement). Literature and Languages, 68:223–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Naigles L.R., Hoff-Ginsberg E. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children’s early verb use’, Journal of Child Language, 25:95–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntelitheos, D., & Manorohanta, C. (2004). Default pronouns and root infinitives in malagasy acquisition. In K. U. Deen et al. (Eds.), The proceedings of the inaugural conference on generative approaches to language acquisition–North America, Honolulu, HI (pp. 249–260). University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4.

  • Okabe, R. (2004). Was the Pig dropped? the acquisition of implicit arguments in Japanese, unpublished Master’s thesis, UCLA.

  • Okabe R., Sano T. (2002). The acquisition of implicit arguments in Japanese and related matters. In: Skarabela B., Fish S., Do A.H.-J. (eds) Proceedings of the Boston University conferenece on language development (Vol 26). Somerville, MA, Cascadilla Press, pp. 485–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouhalla, J. (1994). The construct state in Berber. In Studies in Afroasiatic Grammar. (pp. 278–301). Sofia Antipolis.

  • Pearson, M. (2001). The clause structure of Malagasy: A minimalist approach, UCLA dissertations in Linguistics 21, Department of Linguistics, UCLA.

  • Pearson M. (2005). The Malagasy subject/topic as an A′-element. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 23:381–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce A.E. (1992). Language acquisition and syntactic theory: A comparative analysis of French and English child grammars. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzack C. (1992). Functional categories in early Swedish. In: Meisel J. (eds). The acquisition of functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 66–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzack C. (1996). The initial hypothesis of syntax, a minimalist perspective on language acquisition. In: Clahsen H. (ed) Generative perspectives on language acquisition. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 369–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett K., & Strömqvist, S. (1990). The acquisition of Scandinavian languages. In J. Allwood (Ed.), Gothenburg papers in theoretical linguistics. Gothenburg.

  • Poeppel D., Wexler K. (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pye C. (1992), The acquisition of Kiche Maya. In: Slobin D.I. (ed) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 221–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye C. (2001). The acquisition of finiteness in K’iche’ Maya. In: Do A.H.-J., Domínguez L., Johansen A. (eds) Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University conference on language development. Somerville, MA, Cascadilla Press, pp. 645–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, C., & Quixtan Poz, P. (1988). Precocious passives and antipassives in Quiche Mayan. In E. Clark, & Y. Matsumoto (Eds.), Papers and reports on child language development (Vol. 27, pp. 71–80). Stanford University.

  • Rajaona S. (1972). Structure du Malgache Etudes des Formes Prédicatives. Fianarantsoa, Librairie Ambozontany

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajemisa-Raolison R. (1971). Grammaire Malgache (7ème Édition). Centre de Formation Pédagogique, Ambozontany, Fianarantsoa

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasetti L. (1999). Null subjects and root infinitives in the child grammar of French. In: Friedmann M.-A., Rizzi L. (eds) The acquisition of syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics. Harlow, Longman, pp. 237–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, J., & Wexler, K. (1995). Optional infinitives in Hebrew. In MIT working Papers in Linguistics (vol. 26, pp. 383–402).

  • Richards N. (2000). Another look at Tagalog subjects. In: Paul I. et al. (eds) Formal issues in Austronesian linguistics. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 105–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi L. (1994). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3:371–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In: Haegeman L. (ed) Elements of grammar. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 281–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi L. (1999). Remarks on early null subjects. In: Friedemann M.-A., Rizzi L. (eds) The acquisition of syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics. Harlow, Longman, pp. 269–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper T., Rohrbacher B. (2000). Null subjects in early child English and the theory of economy of projection. In: Powers S.M., Hamann C. (eds) The acquisition of scrambling and cliticization. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 345–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland C., Pine J., Lieven E., Theakston A (2003). Determinants of the order of acquisition of Wh-questions: Reevaluating the role of caregiver speech. Journal of Child Language, 30:609–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart D. McClelland J. (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs. In: Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L. (eds) Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rus D., Chandra P. (2005). Bare participles are not root infinitives: Evidence from early child Slovenian. In: Brugos A., Clark-Cotton M.R., Ha S. (eds) BUCLD 29. Sommerville, MA, Cascadilla Press, pp. 493–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Salustri, M. (1998). Acquisizione Simultanea di Italiano e Tedesco. Studio Longitudinale in Alcuni Bambini di età Prescolare. unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Università degli Studi di Siena.

  • Salustri M., Hyams, N. (2003). Is there a RI analogue in the null subjects languages?, B. Beachley, A. Brown & F. Conlin (Eds.), Proceedings of BUCLD 27, (Vol. 27, pp. 692–703). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

  • Sano T., Hyams N. (1994). Agreement, finiteness, and the development of null arguments. In: Gonzàlez M. (ed) NELS 24: Proceedings of the North east Linguistic Society. Amherst, GLSA, pp. 543–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelmann, L. (1995). The acquisition of verb second grammar in child swedish. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.

  • Schachter, P. (1987). Tagalog. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The world’s major languages, (pp. 935–958). Oxford University Press.

  • Schütze, C. T. (1997). INFL in child and adult language: Agreement, case, and licensing. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Schütze C.T. (2001). On the nature of default case. Syntax, 4:205–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjónsdóttir S. (1999). Root infinitives and null subjects in early Icelandic. In: Greenhill A. et al. (eds) Proceedings of BUCLD 23. Somerville, MA, Cascadilla Press, pp. 630–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder W., Hyams N., Crisma P. (1995). Romance auxiliary selection with reflexive clitics: Evidence for early knowledge of unaccusativity. In: Clark E. (ed) Proceedings of the 26th annual child language research forum. Stanford, CA, CSLI Publications, pp. 127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugisaki, K. (1997). Japanese passives in acquisition. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Meeting of the Sophia Linguistic Society, Sophia University.

  • Travis, L. (1991). Derived objects, inner aspect, and the structure of VP. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS 22).

  • Travis, L. (1994). Event phrase and a theory of functional categories. In P. Koskinen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1994 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association, Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (pp. 559–570). Toronto.

  • Travis, L. (1996). The syntax of achievements. ms., McGill University.

  • Travis L. (2000). The l-syntax/S-syntax boundary: Evidence from Austronesian. In: Paul I. et al. (eds) Formal issues in Austronesian linguistics. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 167–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, E. (2003). Object drop in the L1 acquisition of Dutch. unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam/LOT.

  • Valian V. (1991). Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian Children. Cognition, 40:21–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varlokosta S., Vainikka A., Rohrbacher B. (1998) Functional projections, markedness and root infinitives in early child Greek. The Linguistic Review, 15:187–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers J., de Villiers P. (1985). The acquisition of English. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, 1:27–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrips M. (1996). Potatoes must peel: The acquisition of the Dutch passive. Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrips M., Weissenborn J. (1992). Routes to verb placement in early German and French: The independence of finiteness and agreement. In: Meisel J. (ed) The acquisition of verb placement. Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 283–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q., Martin D.L., Best C., Levitt A. (1992). Null subject versus null subject: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition, 2:221–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement, and the economy of derivations in child grammar. In: Lightfoot D., Hornstein N. (eds) Verb Movement. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 305–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K. (2004). Beauty and awe: Language acquisition as high science. Plenary address at the Boston University Conference on Language Development 29.

  • White L. (1982). Grammatical theory and language acquisition. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnen F. (1997). The temporal interpretation of root infinitivals: The effect of eventivity. In: Schaeffer J. (ed) The interpretation of root infinitives and bare nouns in child language. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 1x). Cambridge, MA, MITWPL, pp. 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams E. (2003). Representation theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zribi-Hertz A., Mbolatianavalona L. (1999). Towards a modular theory of linguistic deficiency: Evidence from Malagasy personal pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17:161–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Hyams.

Additional information

We would like to express our deepest appreciation to the children and families who participated in our study. Our gratitude also to Ed Keenan, who spent countless hours going through the acquisition data with us and who never tired of explaining the fine points of Malagasy or sharing with us his adventures in Madagascar. Thanks also to Matt Pearson and Lisa Travis for their very detailed comments on an earlier draft of this paper, to Murat Kural, Nathan Klinedinst, and three NLLT reviewers whose careful reading has greatly improved this paper. Our appreciation also to Marcel den Dikken for his help throughout the review process. Parts of this paper have been presented at AFLA XIII and at GALA 2005. We are grateful to the audiences at these conferences for their helpful comments. Finally, our thanks also to Zahra Khalili and Nathan Klinedinst for editorial assistance. This project was partially supported by a UCLA Faculty Senate Grant to Hyams. All errors are of course our own.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hyams, N., Ntelitheos, D. & Manorohanta, C. Acquisition of the Malagasy voicing system: implications for the adult grammar. Nat Language Linguistic Theory 24, 1049–1092 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9009-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9009-2

Keywords

Navigation