Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Post-Syntactic Movement and the Old Irish Verb

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The placement of second position clitics has been analysed as involving syntactic movement, morphological transpositions, or prosodic inversion. This paper argues that a syntactic treatment of the Old Irish verbal complex is untenable and that facts about allomorphy and phonological phrasing preclude a prosodic inversion analysis. I show how application of a morphological transposition operation (the Morphological Merger operation in a Distributed Morphology framework) not only to overt clitics in the language, but also to the functional head Force, provides a unified analysis of this highly intricate system.

Many thanks to no less than five anonymous referees, who have helped shape this paper, to audiences at Essex, Cambridge, University College London and Stuttgart. Thanks also to Daniel Harbour for comments on a draft and to Aiden Doyle for fixing my clumsy translation of Old Irish. This work was supported by AHRB Grant APN-11524.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Adger David (1996). ‘Agreement, Aspect and Measure Phrases in Scottish Gaelic’. In: Borsley, R. and Roberts, I. (eds) The Syntax of the Celtic Languages., pp 200–222. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger David (2000). ‘V1 Phenomena and the Syntax Prosody Interface’. In: Billerey, R. and Lillehaugen, B.D. (eds) Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 19., pp 1–14. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger David and Gillian Ramchand (2005). ‘Move and Merge: Wh-Dependencies Revisited’. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 161–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson Stephen (1993). ‘Wackernagel’s Revenge: Clitics, Morphology and the Syntax of Second Position’. Language 69: 68–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson Stephen and Sandy Chung (1977). ‘On Grammatical Relations and Clause Structure in Verb-Initial Languages’. In: Cole, P. and Sadock, J. (eds) Grammatical Relations, Syntax and Semantics vol 8., pp 1–25. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergin Osborn (1938). ‘On the Syntax of the Verb in Old Irish’. Ériu 12: 197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik Jonathan and Andrew Carnie (1996). ‘A Minimalist Approach to Some Problems of Irish Word Order’. In: Borsley, R. and Roberts, I. (eds) The Syntax of the Celtic Languages., pp 223–240. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsley Robert, Maria-Luisa Rivero and Janig Stephens (1996). ‘Long Head Movement in Breton’. In: Borsley, R. and Roberts, I. (eds) The Syntax of the Celtic Languages., pp 53–74. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Breatnach Liam (1977). ‘The Suffixed Pronouns in Early Irish’. Celtica 12: 75–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney James (1977). ‘Aspects of Archaic Irish’. Éigse 17: 417–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnie Andrew (2000). ‘On the Notions XP and X0’. Syntax 3.2: 59–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnie Andrew and Eithne Guilfoyle (2000). The Syntax of VSO languages. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnie Andrew, Heidi Harley and Elizabeth Pyatt (2000). ‘VSO Order as Raising out of IP: Some evidence from Old Irish’. In: A., Carnie and E., Guilfoyle (eds) The Syntax of Verb Initial Languages., pp 39–59. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnie Andrew, Elizabeth Pyatt and Heidi Harley (1994). ‘The Resurrection: Raising to Comp? Some Evidence from Old Irish’. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 24: 85–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky Noam (1993). ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’. In: Hale, K. and Keyser, S. (eds) The View from Building 20., pp 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky Noam (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky Noam. (2000). ‘Minimalist Inquiries: the Framework’. In: Martin, R., Michaels, D. and Uriagereka, J. (eds) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honour of Howard Lasnik., pp 89–115. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky Noam (2001). ‘Derivation by Phase’. In: Kenstowicz, M. (eds) Ken Hale: A Life in Language., pp 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty Cathal (2000). ‘Residual Verb Second in Early Irish: On the Nature of Bergin’s Constructions’. Diachronica 17: 5–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffield Nigel (1995). Particles and Projections in Irish Syntax. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick David and Rolf Noyer (2001). ‘Movement Operations after Syntax’. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Antony D(1997).‘The Prosodic Structure of Irish, Scots Gaelic and Manx’. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University

  • Samuel J. Keyser, Hale and Kenneth (1993). ‘On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations’. In: Hale, K. and Keyser, S.J. (eds) The View from Building 20., pp 53–109. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Alec Marantz, Halle and Morris (1993). ‘Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection’. In: Hale, K. and Keyser, S.J. (eds) The View from Building 20., pp 111–176. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern and Aaron (1995). Topics in the Placement and Morphology of Clitic. CSLI, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway-King and Tracy (1997). ‘The Prosodic Status of A and A’-heads in Slavic’. In: Kusumoto, K. (eds) Proceedings of NELS 27, pp 253–249. GLSA, Amherst, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac G.R. (1993). ‘Issues in the Reconstruction and Analysis of Insular Celtic Syntax and Phonology’. Ériu 44: 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard J and Jeffers (1978). ‘Old Irish Verbal Nouns’. Ériu 29: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson and Richard (1988). ‘On the Double Object Construction’. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz and Alec (1988). ‘Clitics, Morphological Merger and the Mapping to Phonological Structure’. In: Hammond, M. and Noonan, M. (eds) Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics., pp 253–270. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Massam and Diane (2000). ‘VSO and VOS: Aspects of Niuean Word Order’. In: Carnie, A. and Guilfoyle, E. (eds) The Syntax of Verb Initial Languages., pp 97–116. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey and James (1978). ‘Stress and Syntax in Old Irish Compound Verbs’. In: Schmerling, S.F. and Smith, C.S. (eds) Texas Linguistic Forum., pp 58–71. University of Texas Department of Linguistics, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey and James (1983). ‘A VP in a VSO Language?’. In: Gazdar, G., Klein, E. and Pullum, G. (eds) Order Concord and Constituency., pp 9–55. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, James (1991). ‘Clause Structure, Ellipsis and Proper Government in Irish’. Lingua 85: 259–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, James (1996). ‘On the Scope of Verb Movement in Irish’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 47–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCone, Kim (1979). ‘Pretonic Preverbs and the Absolute Verbal Endings in Old Irish’. Ériu 30: 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • McCone, Kim (1982). ‘Further to Absolute and Conjunct’. Ériu 33: 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • McCone, Kim (1997). The Early Irish Verb. An Sagart, Maynooth

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Glenda(2002). ‘The Double System of Verbal Inflection in Old Irish: A Minimalist Analysis’. unpublished MPhil thesis University of Cambridge, U.K

  • Ó hUiginn and Ruari (1998). ‘Complementation in Early Irish: the verba dicendi’. Ériu 49: 121–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Poletto, Cecilia (2000). The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves (1989). ‘Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP’. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackowski, Andrea and Lisa Travis (2000). ‘V-Initial Languages: X or XP Movement and Adverbial Placement’. In: Carnie, A. and Guilfoyle, E. (eds) The Syntax of Verb Initial Languages., pp 117–141. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramchand, Gillian (1997). Aspect and Predication: The Semantics of Argument Structure. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, Maria-Luisa (1991). ‘Long Head Movement and Negation: Serbo-Croatian vs. Slovak and Czech’. The Linguistic Review 8: 319–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, Maria-Luisa (1994). ‘Clause Structure and V-Movement in the Languages of the Balkans’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 63–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, Maria-Luisa (2000). ‘Finiteness and Second Position in Long Head Movement Languages’. In: Borsley, R. (eds) The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories., pp 295–323. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi (1997). ‘The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery’. In: Haegeman, L. (eds) Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax., pp 281–337. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi and Ian Roberts (1989). ‘Complex Inversion in French’. Probus 1: 1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian (1994). ‘Two Types of Head Movement in Romance’. In: Lightfoot, D. and Hornstein, N. (eds) Verb Movement., pp 207–242. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian (2005). Principles and Parameters in a VSO language. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Taylor(2000). ‘Clitics and Agreement’. Ph.D. thesis, MIT

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth (1986). ‘On Derived Domains in Sentence Phonology’. Phonology 3: 371–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth (1995). ‘The Prosodic Structure of Function Words’. In: Beckman, J., Walsh Dickey, L. and Urbanczyk, S. (eds) Papers in Optimality Theory., pp 439–469. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers, GLSA, Amherst, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, Richard (1985). ‘Welsh Syntax and VSO structure’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 173–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starke, Michal (2004). ‘On the Inexistence of Specifiers and the Nature of Heads’. In: Belletti, A. (eds) Structures and Beyond., pp 252–268. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Szendroi, Kriszta(2001). ‘Focus and the Syntax-Phonology Interface’, Ph.D. thesis, University College London

  • Thurneysen, Rudolf (1975). A Grammar of Old Irish. Dublin Institue for Advanced Studies, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriagereka and Juan (1999). ‘Multiple Spellout’. In: Epstein, S.D. and Hornstein, N. (eds) Working Minimalism., pp 251–282. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, Calvert (1963). ‘Preliminaries to a Historical and Comparative Syntax of the Old Irish Verb’. Celtica 6: 1–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Adger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adger, D. Post-Syntactic Movement and the Old Irish Verb. Nat Language Linguistic Theory 24, 605–654 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-0004-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-0004-4

Keywords

Navigation