Skip to main content
Log in

Performance analysis of robust watermarking using linear and nonlinear feature matching

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the feature point matching based watermarking techniques have been paying attention for resisting the geometric attacks. We present a performance analysis of robust watermarking using the linear and nonlinear features. In particular, we consider the geometric attacks and the signal processing attacks for the image watermarking. In order to analyze the efficiency of linear and nonlinear features, we employ the linear and the nonlinear feature matching technique in the image watermarking. The extracted feature points can survive against several attacks, therefore, those can be used as reference points for restoration before the extraction of the watermark information. For blindness and robustness, we embed the watermark into the low-band of the discrete cosine transform (DCT) domain. Experimental results show our performance analysis of watermarking methods using the linear and nonlinear feature matching, against the geometric attacks and the signal processing attacks. These include the JPEG compression, the filtering attacks, and so on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features [4].

References

  1. Alcantarilla PF, Nuevo J, Bartoli A (2013) Fast explicit diffusion for accelerated features in nonlinear scale spaces british machine vision conference (BMVC)

  2. Alcantarilla PF, Bartoli A, Davison AJ (2012) KAZE Features. ECCV, LNCS 7577:214–227

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bas P, Chassery J, Macq B (2002) Geometrically invariant watermarking using feature points. IEEE Trans Image Process 11(9):1014–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Gool LV (2008) SURF: Speeded Up robust features. Comput Vis Image Underst (CVIU) 110(3):346–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coatrieux G, Pan W, Cuppens-Boulahia N, Cuppens F, Roux C (2013) Reversible watermarking based on invariant image classification and dynamic histogram shifting. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 8(1):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernandez MC, Miyatake MN, Meana HP (2009) Robust watermarking based on histogram modification, IEEE International Conference Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 1748–1751

  7. Hernndez-Avalos PA, Feregrino-Uribe C, Cumplido R, Garcia-Hernandez JJ (2010) Towards the Construction of a Benchmark for Video Watermarking Systems: Temporal desynchronization attacks, Proc. of the 53nd MWSCAS, 628–631

  8. Lin CY, Wu M, Bloom Cox JA, Ingemar J, Miller ML, Lui YM (2001) Rotation, scale, and translation resilient watermarking for images. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(5):767–782

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nikolaidis A (2012) Local distortion resistant image watermarking relying on salient feature extraction, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 97

  11. Pereira S, Pun T (2000) Robust template matching for affine resistant image watermarks. IEEE Trans Image Process 6(9):1123–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Petitcolas F, Anderson R, Kuhn M (1998) Attacks on copyright marking systems, LNCS, 218–238

  13. Petitcolas MS, Fabien AP, Raynal F, Dittmann J, Fontaine C, Seibel S, Fates N, Ferri LC (2001) StirMark benchmark: audio watermarking attacks, Proc. of Coding and Computing, 49–54

  14. Qi X, Qi J (2004) Improved affine resistant watermarking by using robust templates, IEEE ICASSP, 495–408

  15. Shih FY et al (2008) Digital Watermarking and Steganography: Fundamentals and Techniques, Taylor & Francis Group. CRC Press., Inc., Boca Raton

  16. Tang CW, Hang HM (2003) A feature-based robust digital image watermarking scheme. IEEE Trans Signal Process 51(4):950–959

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Thanh TM, Hiep PT, Tam TM, Tanaka K (2014) Robust semi-blind video watermarking based on frame-patch matching, AEU - International journal of electronics and communications, ISSN, 1434– 8411

  18. Viet PQ, Miyaki T, Yamasaki T, Aizawa K (2008) Robust object-based watermarking using feature matching. IEICE Trans Inform Syst E91-D(7):2027–2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Voyatzis G, Pitas I (1996) Chaotic mixing of digital images and applications to watermarking. European Conf Multimed Appl Serv Tech (ECMAST96) 2:687–695

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans on Image Process 13(4):600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang L, Ling H, Zou F, Lu Z (2012) Real-Time Compressed domain video watermarking resistance to geometric distortions. IEEE Multimed 19(1):70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang X, Cao X, Li J (2013) Geometric attack resistant image watermarking based on MSER. Front Comp Sci 7(1):145–156

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng D, Zhao J, Saddik AE (2003) RST-Invariant digital image watermarking based on log-polar mapping and phase correlation. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 13(8):753–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ta Minh Thanh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thanh, T.M., Tanaka, K., Dung, L.H. et al. Performance analysis of robust watermarking using linear and nonlinear feature matching. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 2901–2920 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4435-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4435-1

Keywords

Navigation