Skip to main content
Log in

Contagion of Evacuation Decision Making on Real Map

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with evacuation decision making of people in the disaster area. By threshold model, we discuss whether all agents decide to evacuate or not. It is reported that not all people in the affected area evacuated during the Great East Japan Earthquake. But, many evacuation simulations treat that all people evacuate. In the previous work, on the assumption that all people decide to evacuate, we dealt with the needed time to make all people evacuate if psychological conditions exist at the time of disaster. In this paper, we deal with the condition that not all people decide to evacuate and focus on contagion of evacuation decision making on real map. We found that for contagion of evacuation decision making, local neighborhood and connection of sub network is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drabek TE, Keith B (1968) Families in disaster: reactions and a relatives. J Marriage Fam 443–451

  2. Epstein JE, Axtell RL (1996) Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up (Complex Adaptive Systems). A Bradford Book, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hasan S, Ukkusuri SV (2011) A threshold model of social contagion process for evacuation decision making. Transp Res B Methodol 45(10):1590–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Helbing D, Anders J (2010) Pedestrian, crowd and evacuation dynamics. Encycl Complex Syst Sci 16:6476–6495

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hirose H (2004) Why do people fail to escape (in Japanese). Shueisha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hirose H (2011) Wrest a living from the century of gigantic disaster (in Japanese). Shueisha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hiroshima Prefecture (2013) Hiroshima prefecture assumption of inundated area by high tide and tsunami (in Japanese). http://www.pref.hiroshima.lg.jp/soshiki/4/tsunamisinsuisouteizu.html

  8. Ishii Y, Kusakari T, Minami S, Takeuchi S, Takahashi A, Tomatsu M (2012) A questionnaire to the people regarding the evacuation from the tsunami caused by the east Japan great earthquake: part 1, For Kushiro city (in Japanese). Proc Architec Inst Jpn, Hokkai-do Chapter Architect Res Meet 85:435–440

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iwanaga S, Matsuura Y (2014) Considering psychological conditions in a tsunami evacuation simulation. In: Laurent A et al (eds.) IPMU 2014, Part I, CCIS 442: 437–446

  10. Iwanaga S, Namatame A (2013) Collective behavior in cascade and Schelling model. 17th Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems IES2013. Proc Comput Sci 24:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katada T, Kuwasawa N, Yeh H, Pancake C (2006) Integrated simulation of tsunami hazards. EERI’s Eighth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering 1727

  12. Kure City (2012) Shelters at the time of disaster (in Japanese). http://www.city.kure.lg.jp/kureinfo/info_hinan.pdf

  13. Mas E, Suppasri A, Imamura F, Koshimura S (2012) Agent-based simulation of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake/Tsunami Evacuation: an integrated model of tsunami inundation and evacuation. J Nat Disaster Sci 34(1):41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. NHK Special Collection Team (2013) Mega quake- how human behaved at the time (in Japanese). Iwanami, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  15. NHK Special TV Program (2013) To the future the records of lives-big data of earthquake disaster (in Japanese). http://www.nhk.or.jp/

  16. Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45(2):167–256

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohata D, Takai N, Kagami H (2007) Spatial evaluation of tsunami refuge facilities in the central Kushiro city: simulation of evacuation behavior from tsunami utilizing multi-agent system Part 2 (in Japanese). Architec Inst Jpn 612:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perry RW (1979) Incentives for evacuation in natural disaster. J Am Assoc Planners 48(4):440–447

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Quarantelli EL (1960) Images of withdrawal behavior in disasters: some basic misconceptions. Soc Probl 8:68–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schelling T (1978) Micromotives and macrobehavior. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Social Information Laboratory of Tokyo University, Society for the Study of Disaster and Information (1994) Correspondence of residents and communication of disaster information in Hokkaido Nansei Oki Earthquake of 1993- Huge tsunami and evacuation behavior (in Japanese), Social Information Laboratory of Tokyo University, Tokyo, pp. 11–18

  22. Ushiyama M, Yokomaku S (2012) Great east Japan earthquake and disaster information- special edition- feature of human damage (in Japanese). J Disaster Inf Stud 10:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  23. Watts DJ (2002) A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(9):5766–5771

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamakage S (2009) Modeling and expanding artificial societies -the possibilities of an artificial society. Shosekikobo Hayama Publishing, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saori Iwanaga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iwanaga, S., Namatame, A. Contagion of Evacuation Decision Making on Real Map. Mobile Netw Appl 21, 206–214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-016-0704-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-016-0704-x

Keywords

Navigation