Skip to main content
Log in

Coopetive Spectrum Trading – Creating Endogenous Spectrum Holes

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamic spectrum access has been proposed to address the spectrum scarcity. Based on this access mode, secondary users are allowed to opportunistically operate when primary users are absent. Secondary Users are, however, required to relinquish the spectrum upon return of the incumbent spectrum holder. Although it improves spectrum utility, opportunistic spectrum access limits secondary users’ access to exogenous spectrum holes vacated by primary users. We argue that spectrum holes should be endogenous, enabled by incentives to incumbent users to increase spectrum availability, while mitigating risk. To this end, we take a different perspective on dynamic spectrum sharing and propose a coopetive framework, whereby primary and secondary users engage in a cooperative, yet competitive, auction-driven spectrum sharing to enhance spectrum usage. In this framework, the primary users’spectrum is organized in three bands, namely exclusive usage, usage right and management right bands. Based on this structure, spectrum is traded as financial options to increase trading flexibility and capture the value primary and secondary users attach to spectrum access and usage. Spectrum trading between primary and secondary users is formalized as a utility maximization problem. Approximate solutions to this problem are derived and their performance is analyzed. The results show that spectrum trading, which combines revocable and exclusive leasing, provides higher utilities for both primary and secondary users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bykowsky M (2003) A secondary market for the trading of spectrum: promoting market liquidity. Telecommun Policy 27(7):533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Caicedo CE, Weiss MB (2011) The viability of spectrum trading markets. IEEE Commun Mag 49(3):46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crocioni P (2009) Is allowing trading enough? making secondary markets in spectrum work. Telecommun Policy 33(8):451–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Farquhar MC, Fitzgerald AQ (2003) Legal and regulatory issues regarding spectrum rights trading. Telecommun Policy 27(7):527–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gandhi S, Buragohain C, Cao L, Zheng H, Suri S (2007) A general framework for wireless spectrum auctions. In: 2nd IEEE international symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks, DySPAN 2007, IEEE, pp 22-33

  6. Im S, Lee H (2012) Dynamic spectrum allocation based on binary integer programming under interference graph. In: 2012 IEEE 23rd international symposium on personal indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC), IEEE, pp 226-231

  7. Jia J, Zhang Q, Zhang Q, Liu M (2009) Revenue generation for truthful spectrum auction in dynamic spectrum access. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing, ACM, pp 3-12

  8. Niyato D, Hossain E (2007) Optimal price competition for spectrum sharing in cognitive radio: a dynamic game-theoretic approach. In: Global Telecommunications Conference, GLOBECOM07, IEEE, pp 4625-4629

  9. Niyato D, Hossain E (2008) Competitive pricing for spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks: dynamic game, inefficiency of nash equilibrium, and collusion. Sel Areas Commun, IEEE J 26(1):192-202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Niyato D, Hossain E, Han Z (2009) Dynamics of multiple-seller and multiple-buyer spectrum trading in cognitive radio networks: A game-theoretic modeling approach. Mob Comput, IEEE Trans 8(8):1009-1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodriguez V, Moessner K, Tafazolli R (2005) Auction driven dynamic spectrum allocation: Optimal bidding, pricing and service priorities for multi-rate, multi-class cdma. In: The 16th international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications, PIMRC 2005, vol 3. pp 1850-1854. doi:10.1109/PIMRC.2005.1651761

  12. Sengupta S, Chatterjee M, Ganguly S (2007) An economic framework for spectrum allocation and service pricing with competitive wireless service providers. In: 2nd IEEE international symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks, DySPAN 2007, IEEE, pp 89-98

  13. Valletti TM (2001) Spectrum trading. Telecommun Policy 25(10):655–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xavier P, Ypsilanti D (2006) Policy issues in spectrum trading. info 8(2):34–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CNS-1162159 and Grant No. CNS-11494442. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taieb Znati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, L., Znati, T. & Weiss, M.B.H. Coopetive Spectrum Trading – Creating Endogenous Spectrum Holes. Mobile Netw Appl 19, 451–466 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-014-0523-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-014-0523-x

Keywords

Navigation