Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 1–21

Assisted versus asserted autonomy satisfaction: Their unique associations with wellbeing, integration of experience, and conflict negotiation

  • Lisa Legault
  • Kayla Ray
  • Amy Hudgins
  • Marissa Pelosi
  • Will Shannon
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11031-016-9593-3

Cite this article as:
Legault, L., Ray, K., Hudgins, A. et al. Motiv Emot (2017) 41: 1. doi:10.1007/s11031-016-9593-3

Abstract

We investigate the possibility of two distinct approaches to autonomy satisfaction—one that is contextually “assisted” and one that is individually “asserted”. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (Pilot Study and Study 1; N = 449) develop and validate the two-factor structure. We then show that asserted and assisted autonomy orientations predict psychological wellbeing through distinct pathways (i.e., highly active/agentic vs. interdependent). In Study 2 (N = 206), we examine the sociodevelopmental antecedents of each type of autonomy satisfaction, revealing that assisted autonomy is associated with having had authoritiative parents, whereas asserted autonomy is associated with having had authoritarian parents. In Study 3 (N = 109) we show that asserted—but not assisted—autonomy predicts the integration of negative life experiences. Finally, in Study 4 (N = 202), we examine the degree to which assisted and asserted autonomy moderate responses to conflict in need-thwarting contexts, showing that assisted autonomy predicts an acquiescent coping style, whereas asserted autonomy predicts an assertive negotiation style.

Keywords

AutonomyPsychological needsWellbeingMotivationIntegrationNeed thwartingConflict negotiation

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clarkson UniversityPotsdamUSA