Abstract
Accurate assessment of the cost of carbon sequestration is important for the development of mitigation policies globally. Given that sequestration in soils or vegetation is a lengthy process, such assessment requires financial discounting and making realistic assumptions about changes over time in the rate of sequestration, the price of carbon, and the opportunity cost incurred by adopting sequestration practices. Our objective is to demonstrate how these assumptions affect estimates of the cost of sequestration-based mitigation strategies. Using an Australian case study of soil carbon sequestration, our estimates of the carbon price required for financial viability are highly sensitive to dynamic assumptions, varying by a factor of four with different assumptions. Yet the influence of these time-related assumptions is poorly acknowledged in the literature, with many studies either failing to disclose their assumptions, or employing questionable assumptions and methods. Recommended global strategies are for researchers to report their assumptions related to dynamics much more transparently and to improve their research methods and the realism of their assumptions when analysing the economics of carbon sequestration. We recommend that policymakers become better aware of the issues created by dynamics, so that they are able to validly interpret assessments of the cost of sequestration and to ensure that they design policies in a way that facilitates fair comparison of the costs of mitigation strategies that operate over different timescales.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antle JM, Capalbo SM, Mooney S et al (2001) Economic analysis of agricultural soil carbon sequestration: an integrated assessment approach. J Agr Resour Econ 26:344–367
Antle J, Capalbo S, Mooney S et al (2003) Spatial heterogeneity, contract design, and the efficiency of carbon sequestration policies for agriculture. J Environ Econ Manag 46:231–250. doi:10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00038-4
Arrow KJ, Cropper ML, Gollier C et al (2012) How should benefits and costs be discounted in an intergenerational context? Resour Futur Discus Pap 12:53
Arrow K, Cropper M, Gollier C et al (2013) Determining benefits and costs for future generations. Science 341:349–350. doi:10.1126/science.1235665
Boyland M (2006) The economics of using forests to increase carbon storage. Can J For Res 36:2223–2234. doi:10.1139/x06-094
De Jong BHJ, Tipper R, Montoya-Gómez G (2000) An economic analysis of the potential for carbon sequestration by forests: evidence from southern Mexico. Ecol Econ 33:313–327. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00162-7
Department of the Environment (2015a). Emissions Reduction Fund. www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reduction-fund Cited 21 May 2015
Department of the Environment (2015b). Sequestering carbon in soils in grazing systems. Australian Government. http://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reduction-fund/cfi/methodologies/determinations/sequestering-carbon-in-soils Cited 29 May 2015
Diagana B, Antle J, Stoorvogel J et al (2007) Economic potential for soil carbon sequestration in the Nioro region of Senegal’s Peanut Basin. Agr Syst 94:26–37. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.010
Doraiswamy PC, McCarty GW, Hunt ER Jr et al (2007) Modeling soil carbon sequestration in agricultural lands of Mali. Agr Syst 94:63–74. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2005.09.011
Flugge F, Abadi A (2006) Farming carbon: an economic analysis of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and dryland salinity reduction in Western Australia. Agroforest Syst 68:181–192. doi:10.1007/s10457-006-9008-7
Gollier C, Weitzman ML (2010) How should the distant future be discounted when discount rates are uncertain? Econ Lett 107:350–353. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2010.03.001
Government of Alberta (2015). Alberta-based offset credit system. www.esrd.alberta.ca/focus/alberta-and-climate-change/regulating-greenhouse-gas-emissions/alberta-based-offset-credit-system/default.aspx Cited 9 May 2015
Grace PR, Antle J, Ogle S et al (2010) Soil carbon sequestration rates and associated economic costs for farming systems of south-eastern Australia. Aust J Soil Res 48:720–729
Harper RJ, Beck AC, Ritson P et al (2007) The potential of greenhouse sinks to underwrite improved land management. Ecol Eng 29:329–341. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.025
Henry M, Tittonell P, Manlay RJ et al (2009) Biodiversity, carbon stocks and sequestration potential in aboveground biomass in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya. Agr Ecosyst Environ 129:238–252. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.09.006
Hertzler GL (2006) Compounding and discounting under risk: net present values and real options values. In: Pannell DJ, Schilizzi SGM (eds) Economics and the future: time and discounting in private and public decision making. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
Ingram JSI, Fernandes ECM (2001) Managing carbon sequestration in soils: concepts and terminology. Agr Ecosyst Environ 87:111–117. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00145-1
Karky BS, Skutsch M (2010) The cost of carbon abatement through community forest management in Nepal Himalaya. Ecol Econ 69:666–672. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.10.004
Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL et al (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. Eur J Agron 18:267–288. doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00108-9
Kingwell R (2009) The carbon challenge for mixed enterprise farms. Paper presented at the New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society’s Annual Conference, Nelson, 27–28 August 2009
Kingwell RS, Pannell DJ (1987) MIDAS, a bioeconomic model of a dryland farm system. Pudoc, Wageningen
Kragt ME, Pannell DJ, Robertson MJ et al (2012) Assessing costs of soil carbon sequestration by crop-livestock farmers in Western Australia. Agr Syst 112:27–37. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.06.005
Lam SK, Chen D, Mosier AR et al (2013) The potential for carbon sequestration in Australian agricultural soils is technically and economically limited. Sci Rep 3:2179. doi:10.1038/srep02179
Lawes RA, Kingwell RS (2012) A longitudinal examination of business performance indicators for drought-affected farms. Agr Syst 106:94–101. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2011.10.006
Lewandrowski J, Peters M, Jones C et al. (2004) Economics of sequestering carbon in the US agricultural sector. USDA Economic Research Service, Tech. Bulletin No. 1909
Luedeling E, Sileshi G, Beedy T et al (2011) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in Africa. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems. Springer, Netherlands
McKenney DW, Yemshanov D, Fox G et al (2006) Using bioeconomic models to assess research priorities: a case study on afforestation as a carbon sequestration tool. Can J For Res 36:886–900. doi:10.1139/x05-297
Moulton RJ, Richards KR (1990) Costs of sequestering carbon through tree planting and forest management in the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Gen. Tech. Report WO-58
Ndjondo M, Gourlet-Fleury S, Manlay RJ et al (2014) Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa. Carbon Balance Manag 9:1–13
Newell RG, Stavins RN (2000) Climate change and forest sinks: factors affecting the costs of carbon sequestration. J Environ Econ Manag 40:211–235. doi:10.1006/jeem.1999.1120
Nielsen ASE, Plantinga AJ, Alig RJ (2014) New cost estimates for carbon sequestration through afforestation in the United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-888. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR
Pannell DJ, Schilizzi S (eds) (2006) Economics and the future: time and discounting in private and public decision making. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK
Pautsch GR, Kurkalova LA, Babcock BA et al (2001) The efficiency of sequestering carbon in agricultural soils. Contemp Econ Policy 19:123–134. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7287.2001.tb00055.x
Petersen EH, Schilizzi S, Bennett D (2003) Greenhouse gas and groundwater recharge abatement benefits of tree crops in south-western Australian farming systems. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 47:211–231
Popp M, Nalley L, Fortin C et al (2011) Estimating net carbon emissions and agricultural response to potential carbon offset policies. Agron J 103:1132–1143. doi:10.2134/agronj2010.0517
Quiggin J (2008) Stern and his critics on discounting and climate change: an editorial essay. Clim Chang 89:195–205. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9434-9
Richards KR, Stokes C (2004) A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research. Clim Chang 63:1–48. doi:10.1023/b:clim.0000018503.10080.89
Robison LJ, Barry PJ (1996) Present value models and investment analysis. Academic Page, Northport AL
Rootzén JM, Berndes G, Ravindranath NH et al (2010) Carbon sequestration versus bioenergy: a case study from South India exploring the relative land-use efficiency of two options for climate change mitigation. Biomass Bioenerg 34:116–123. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.10.008
Sasaki N, Yoshimoto A (2010) Benefits of tropical forest management under the new climate change agreement—a case study in Cambodia. Environ Sci Policy 13:384–392. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.04.007
Seidl R, Rammer W, Jäger D et al (2007) Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria. For Ecol Manag 248:64–79
Silver WL, Ostertag R, Lugo AE (2000) The potential for carbon sequestration through reforestation of abandoned tropical agricultural and pasture lands. Restor Ecol 8:394–407. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80054.x
Stern NH (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, UK
Takimoto A, Nair PKR, Alavalapati JR (2008) Socioeconomic potential of carbon sequestration through agroforestry in the West African Sahel. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 13:745–761. doi:10.1007/s11027-007-9140-3
Teklewold H (2012) The impact of shadow prices and farmers’ impatience on the allocation of a multipurpose renewable resource in Ethiopia. Environ Dev Econ 17:479–505
Thamo T, Pannell DJ (2016) Challenges in developing effective policy for soil carbon sequestration: perspectives on additionality, leakage, and permanence. Clim Pol. doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1075372
Thamo T, Kingwell RS, Pannell DJ (2013) Measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture: economic implications for policy and agricultural producers. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 57:234–252. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00613.x
Torres AB, Marchant R, Lovett JC et al (2010) Analysis of the carbon sequestration costs of afforestation and reforestation agroforestry practices and the use of cost curves to evaluate their potential for implementation of climate change mitigation. Ecol Econ 69:469–477. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.007
Tschakert P (2004) Carbon for farmers: assessing the potential for soil carbon sequestration in the Old Peanut Basin of Senegal. Clim Chang 67:273–290. doi:10.1007/s10584-004-1821-2
Van’t Veld K, Plantinga A (2005) Carbon sequestration or abatement? The effect of rising carbon prices on the optimal portfolio of greenhouse-gas mitigation strategies. J Environ Econ Manag 50:59–81. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2004.09.002
Weitzman ML (1998) Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. J Environ Econ Manag 36:201–208. doi:10.1006/jeem.1998.1052
West T, Six J (2007) Considering the influence of sequestration duration and carbon saturation on estimates of soil carbon capacity. Clim Chang 80:25–41. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9173-8
Wilman EA (2011) Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils. J Agr Resour Econ 36:121
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Table 4 shows the details of the 32 studies we surveyed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thamo, T., Pannell, D.J., Kragt, M.E. et al. Dynamics and the economics of carbon sequestration: common oversights and their implications. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 22, 1095–1111 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9716-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9716-x