Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnosing institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptation to climate change

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Institutions are one of the decisive factors which enable, constrain and shape adaptation to the impacts of climate change, variability and extreme events. However, current understanding of institutions in adaptation situations is fragmented across the scientific community, evidence diverges, and cumulative learning beyond single studies is limited. This study adopts a diagnostic approach to elaborate a nuanced understanding of institutional barriers and opportunities in climate adaptation by means of a model-centred meta-analysis of 52 case studies of public climate adaptation in Europe. The first result is a novel taxonomy of institutional attributes in adaptation situations. It conceptually organises and decomposes the many details of institutions that empirical research has shown to shape climate adaptation. In the second step, the paper identifies archetypical patterns of institutional traps and trade-offs which hamper adaptation. Thirdly, corresponding opportunities are identified that enable actors to alleviate, prevent or overcome specific institutional traps or trade-offs. These results cast doubt on the validity of general institutional design principles for successful adaptation. In contrast to generic principles, the identified opportunities provide leverage to match institutions to specific governance problems that are encountered in specific contexts. Taken together, the results may contribute to more coherence and integration of adaptation research that we need if we are to foster learning about the role of institutions in adaptation situations in a cumulative fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environ Chang 15:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Perrin N (2009) Climate adaptation, local institutions and rural livelihoods. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien KL (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values governance. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 350–367

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen H, Berglund F, Westskog H (2010) Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation – a question of multilevel governance? Environ Plann C 28:276–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW, Delaney EK (2006) Adapting to climate change: public water supply in England and Wales. Clim Chang 78:228–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergsma E, Gupta J, Jong P (2012) Does individual responsibility increase the adaptive capacity of society? The case of local water management in the Netherlands. Resour Conserv Recycl 64:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrang-Ford L, Pearce T, Ford JD (2015) Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research. Reg Environ Chang 15(5):755–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroek GR, Swart RK, Carter TR, Cowan C, Henrichs T, Mela H, Morecraft MD, Rey D (2010) Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies. Global Environ Chang 20:440–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroek GR, Termeer CJAM, Klostermann JEM, Kabat P (2014) Rethinking barriers to adaptation: mechanism-based explanation of impasses in the governance of an innovative adaptation measure. Global Environ Chang 26:108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman EA (2011) Common property rights, adaptive capacity, and response to forest disturbance. Global Environ Chang 21:855–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corfee-Morlot J, Cochran I, Hallegatte S, Teasdale PJ (2011) Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Clim Change 104:169–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cots F, Tàbara JD, McEvoy D, Werners S, Roca E (2009) Cross-border organizations as an adaptive water management response to climate change: the case of the Guadiana river basin. Environ Plann C 27:876–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox M (2012) Diagnosing institutional fit: a formal perspective. Ecol Soc 17(4):54

  • Cox M, Arnold G, Villamayor-Tomás S (2010) A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecol Soc 15(4):38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniell KA, Manez Costa MA, Ferrand N, Kingsborough AB, Coad P, Ribarova IS (2011) Aiding multi-level decision-making processes for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Reg Environ Change 11:243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt D, Langdon D (2004) The UK Climate Change Programme and communication with local authorities. Global Environ Chang 14:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doria MF, Boyd E, Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2009) Using expert elicitation to define successful adaptation to climate change. Environ Sci Policy 12:810–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers SR, Hezri AA (2010) Institutions and policy processes: the means to the ends of adaptation. WIREs Clim Change 1:212–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis J, Biesbroek GR (2013) Comparing apples and oranges: the dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Global Environ Chang 23:1476–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Eriksen S, Eikeland PO, Øyen C (2011) Public sector reform and governance for adaptation: implications of new public management for adaptive capacity in Mexico and Norway. Environ Manage 47:338–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom JA, Moser SC (2014) Identifying and overcoming barriers in urban adaptation efforts to climate change: case study findings from the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA. Urban Clim 9:54–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenack K (2012) Archetypes of adaptation to climate change. In: Glaser M, Krause G, Ratter B, Welp M (eds) Human-nature interactions in the anthropocene: potentials of social-ecological systems analysis. Routledge, New York, pp 107–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenack K, Moser S, Hoffmann E, Klein RJT, Oberlack C, Pechan A, Rotter M, Termeer C (2014) Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 4:867–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenack K, Stecker R (2012) A framework for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 17(3):243–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle NL, Lemos MC (2010) Unpacking governance: building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil. Global Environ Chang 20:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen S, Lind J (2009) Adaptation as a political process: adjusting to drought and conflict in Kenya’s drylands. Environ Manage 43:817–835

  • Falaleeva M, O’Mahony C, Gray S, Desmond M, Gault J, Cummins V (2011) Towards climate adaptation and coastal governance in Ireland: integrated architecture for effective management? Mar Policy 35:784–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Few R, Brown K, Tompkins EL (2007a) Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Clim Policy 7(1):46–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Few R, Brown K, Tompkins EL (2007b) Climate change and coastal management decisions: insights from Christchurch Bay, UK. Coast Manage 35:255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel HM, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Change 75:301–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaz V (2005) Social-ecological resilience and social conflict: institutions and strategic adaptation in Swedish water management. Ambio 34(7):567–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrelts H, Lange H (2011) Path dependencies and path change in complex fields of action: climate adaptation policies in Germany in the realm of flood risk management. Ambio 40:200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Biosci 52(2):143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giansante C, Aguilar M, Babiano L, Garrido A, Gomez A, Martinez EI, Wietze L, Del Moral L, Pedregal B (2002) Institutional adaptation to changing risk of water scarcity in the lower Guadalquivir basin. Nat Resour J 42:521–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaas E, Jonsson A, Hjerpe M, Andersson-Sköld Y (2010) Managing climate change vulnerabilities: formal institutions and knowledge use as determinants of adaptive capacity at the local level in Sweden. Local Environ 15(6):525–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, Termeer C, Klostermann J, Meijerink S, van den Brink M, Jong P, Nooteboom S, Bergsma E (2010) The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Policy 13:459–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn K (2008) Particular requirements for institutional analysis in nature-related sectors. Europ Rev Agric Econ 35(3):357–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harries T, Penning-Rowsell E (2011) Victim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: the case of flood risk. Global Environ Chang 21:188–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrfahrdt-Pähle E, Pahl-Wostl C (2012) Continuity and change in social-ecological systems: the role of institutional resilience. Ecol Soc 17(2):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel J, Bisaro A (2014) Methodological choices in solution-oriented adaptation research: A diagnostic framework. Reg Environ Change (in press) DOI: 10.1007/s10113-014-0682-0

  • Hinkel J, Bisaro A, Swart R (2015) Towards a diagnostic adaptation science. Reg Environ Change DOI:10.1007/s10113-015-0850-x

  • Hjerpe M, Glaas E (2012) Evolving local climate adaptation strategies: incorporating influences of socio-economic stress. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 17:471–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höppner C, Whittle R, Bründl M, Buchecker M (2008) Linking social capacities and risk communication in Europe: a gap between theory and practice? Nat Hazards 64:1753–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitema D, Mostert E, Egas W, Moellenkamp S, Pahl-Wostl C, Yalcin R (2009) Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecol Soc 14(1):26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntjens P, Pahl-Wostl C, Rihoux B, Schlüter M, Flachner Z, Neto S, Koskova R, Dickens C, Kiti IN (2011) Adaptive water management and policy learning in a changing climate: a formal comparative analysis of eight water management regimes in Europe, Africa and Asia. Environ Policy Gov 21:145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntjens P, Lebel L, Pahl-Wostl C, Camkin J, Schulze R, Kranz N (2012) Institutional design propositions for the governance of adaptation to climate change in the water sector. Global Environ Chang 22:67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inderberg TH (2011) Institutional constraints to adaptive capacity: adaptability to climate change in the Norwegian electricity sector. Local Environ 16(4):303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivey JL, Smithers J, de Loe RC, Kreutzwiser RD (2004) Community capacity for adaptation to climate-induced water shortages: linking institutional complexity and local actors. Environ Manage 33(1):36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johula S, Westerhoff L (2011) Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: a case study of network governance in two European countries. Environ Sci Policy 14:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskitalo ECH, Westerhoff L, Juhola S (2012) Agenda-setting on the environment: the development of climate change adaptation as an issue in European states. Environ Policy Gov 22:381–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Juhola S (2014) A framework for Nordic actor-centered adaptation research. Environ Sci Pol 40:101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Midgley GF, Preston BL, Alam M, Berkhout FGH, Dow K, Shaw MR (2014) Adaptation opportunities, constraints, and limits. In: Barros V et al (eds) Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, pp 899–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn F, Merz B, Penning-Rowsell EC, Kundzewicz ZW (2015) Preface: climate change proof flood risk management. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 20(6):837–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krysanova V, Dickens C, Timmerman J, Varela-Ortega C, Schlüter M, Roest K, Huntjens P, Jaspers F, Buiteveld H, Moreno E, de Pedraza CJ, Slámová R, Martínková M, Blanco I, Esteve P, Pringle K, Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P (2010) Cross-comparison of climate change adaptation strategies across large river basins in Europe, Africa and Asia. Water Resour Manag 24:4121–4160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz ZW, Lugeri N, Dankers R, Hirabayashi Y, Döll P, Pińskwar I, Dysarz T, Hochrainer S, Matczak P (2010) Assessing river flood risk and adaptation in Europe—review of projections for the future. Mitig Adapt Strategies Global Change 15(7):641–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen SV, Kørnøv L, Weijs A (2012) Mind the gap in SEA: an institutional perspective on why assessment of synergies amongst climate change mitigation, adaptation and other policy areas are missing. Environ Impact Asses 33:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L, Manuta JB, Garden P (2011) Institutional traps and vulnerability to changes in climate and flood regimes in Thailand. Reg Environ Change 11:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann P, Brenck M, Gebhardt O, Schaller S, Süßbauer E (2015) Barriers and opportunities for urban adaptation planning: analytical framework and evidence from cities in Latin America and Germany. Mitig Adapt Strategies Global Change 20(1):75–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libecap GD (2011) Institutional path dependence in climate adaptation: Coman’s “some unsettled problems of irrigation”. Am Econ Rev 101:64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lövbrand E (2011) Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge. Science Pub Policy 38(3):225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden L, Penning-Rowsell E, Tapsell S (2009) Strategic coastal flood-risk management in practice: actors’ perspectives on the integration of flood risk management in London and the Thames Estuary. Ocean Coast Manage 52:636–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC (2009) Whether our levers are long enough and the fulcrum strong? Exploring the soft underbelly of adaptation decisions and actions. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien KL (eds) Adapting to climate change. Thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 313–334

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Boykoff MT (eds) (2013) Successful adaptation to climate change. Linking science and policy in a rapidly changing world. Routledge, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Munaretto S, Vellinga P, Tobi H (2012) Flood protection in Venice under conditions of sea-level rise: an analysis of institutional and technical measures. Coast Manage 40(4):355–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Næss LO, Bang G, Eriksen S, Vevatne J (2005) Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Global Environ Chang 15:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oberlack C, Eisenack K (2014) Alleviating barriers to urban climate change adaptation through international cooperation. Glob Environ Chang 24:349–362

  • Oberlack C, Neumärker B (2013) A diagnostic approach to the institutional analysis of climate adaptation. Constitutional Economics Network Paper No. 01-2013, Freiburg

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Galaz V, Hahn T, Schultz L (2007) Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve Sweden. Ecol Soc 12(1):28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberghaus D, Dannenberg A, Mennel T, Sturm B (2010) The role of the government in adaptation to climate change. Environ Plann C 28:834–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(39):15181–15187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2010) Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2011) Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Policy Stud J 39(1):7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan JJ, Bradford RA, Bonaiuto M, de Dominicis S, Rotko P, Aaltonen J, Waylen K, Langan SJ (2012) Enhancing flood resilience through improved risk communications. Nat Haz Earth Sys 12:2271–2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola J (2007) Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecol Econ 63:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environ Chang 19:354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M, High C, Dearing J, Smith D (2008) Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organizations. Environ Plann A 40:867–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrow T, Thieken AH, Kreibich H, Bahlburg CH, Merz B (2006) Improvement on flood alleviation in Germany: lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002. Environ Manage 38:717–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts D (2008) Thinking globally, acting locally. Institutionalizing climate change at the local government level in Durban, South Africa. Environ & Urban 20(2):521–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodima-Taylor D, Olwig MF, Chhetri N (2012) Adaptation as innovation, innovation as adaptation: an institutional approach to climate change. Appl Geogr 33:107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouillard JJ, Heal KV, Reeves AD, Ball T (2012) Impact of institutions on flood policy learning. Water Policy 14:232–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudberg PM, Wallgren O, Swartling ÅG (2012) Beyond generic adaptive capacity: exploring the adaptation space of the water supply and wastewater sector of the Stockholm region, Sweden. Clim Chang 114:707–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel T (2008) Meta-analyses of case studies: a method for studying regional and global environmental change. Global Environ Chang 18:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruigh-van der Ploen T (2011) Manifestations of adaptive capacity: an institutional analysis of adaptation of a local stormwater drainage system. Clim Law 2:201–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Runhaar H, Mees H, Wardekker A, van der Sluijs J, Driessen PPJ (2012) Adaptation to climate change-related risks in Dutch urban areas: stimuli and barriers. Reg Environ Change 12(4):777–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlager E, Heikilla T (2011) Left high and dry? Climate change, common-pool resource theory, and the adaptability of Western water compacts. Public Admin Rev 71(3):461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendzimir J, Magnuszewski P, Flachner Z, Balogh P, Molnar G, Sarvari A, Nagy Z (2008) Assessing the resilience of a river management regime: informal learning in a shadow network in the Tisza river basin. Ecol Soc 13(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma U, Scolobig A, Patt A (2012) The effects of decentralization on the production and use of risk assessment: insights from landslide management in India and Italy. Nat Hazards 64:1357–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan V, Lambin EF, Gorelick SM, Thompson BH, Rozelle S (2012) The nature and causes of the global water crisis: syndromes from a meta‐analysis of coupled human‐water studies. Water Resour Res 48(10):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storbjörk S (2007) Governing climate adaptation in the local arena: challenges of risk management and planning in Sweden. Local Environ 12(5):457–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storbjörk S, Hedrén J (2011) Institutional capacity-building for targeting sea-level rise in the climate adaptation of Swedish coastal zone management: lessons from Coastby. Ocean Coastal Manage 54:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ, van der Grijp N, Olsthoorn AA, van der Werff PE (2003) Adapting to climate: a case study on riverine flood risks in the Netherlands. Risk Anal 23(3):575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins EL, Eakin H (2012) Managing public and private adaptation. Global Environ Chang 22:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler NJC, Turi JM, Sundset MA, Strøm Bull K, Sara MN, Reinert E, Oskal N, Nellemann C, McCarthy JJ, Mathiesen SD, Martello ML, Magga OH, Hovelsrud GK, Hanssen-Bauer I, Eira NI, Eira IMG, Corell RW (2007) Saami reindeer pastoralism under climate change: applying a generalized framework for vulnerability studies to a sub-arctic social-ecological system. Global Environ Chang 17:191–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urwin K, Jordan A (2008) Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environ Chang 18:180–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Herk S, Zevenbergen C, Ashley R, Rijke J (2011) Learning and action alliances for the integration of flood risk management into urban planning: a new framework from empirical evidence from the Netherlands. Environ Sci Policy 14:543–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatn A (2005) Institutions and the environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Villamayor-Tomás S (2014) Cooperation in common property regimes under extreme drought conditions: empirical evidence from the use of pooled transferable quotas in Spanish irrigation systems. Ecol Econ 107:482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamsler C, Lawson N (2012) Complementing institutional with localised strategies for climate change adaptation: a south–north comparison. Disasters 36(1):28–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardekker JA, de Jong A, Knoop JM, van der Sluijs JP (2010) Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes. Technol Forecasting Social Change 77:987–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weichselgartner J, Kasperson R (2010) Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Global Environ Chang 20:266–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werners SE, Flachner Z, Matczak P, Falaleeva M, Leemans R (2009) Exploring earth system governance: a case study of floodplain management along the Tisza river in Hungary. Global Environ Chang 19:503–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West JJ, Hovelsrud GK (2010) Cross-scale adaptation challenges in the coastal fisheries: findings from Lebesby, northern Norway. Arctic 63(3):338–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff L, Johula S (2010) Science-policy linkages in climate change adaptation in Europe. Int J Clim Change Strategies Manage 2(3):222–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff L, Keskitalo ECH, Johula S (2011) Capacities across scales: local to national adaptation policy in four European countries. Clim Policy 11(4):1071–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E (2006) Adapting to climate change at the local level: the spatial planning response. Local Environ 11(6):609–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates JS (2012) Uneven interventions and the scalar politics of governing livelihood adaptation in rural Nepal. Global Environ Chang 22:537–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2014) Case study research: design and methods, 5th edn. Sage, Los Angeles, et al

  • Young OR (2008) Building regimes for socioecological systems in institutions and environmental change: Institutional diagnostics. In: Young OR, King L, Schroeder H (eds) Institutions and environmental change. Principal findings, applications and research frontiers. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 115–144

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2010) Institutional dynamics: resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Global Environ Chang 20:378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2013) Sugaring off: enduring insights from long-term research on environmental governance. Int Environ Agree-P 13:87–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Valuable comments by Klaus Eisenack, Bernhard Neumärker, Matteo Roggero, Maja Rotter, Stefanie J. Schmidt, Andreas Thiel, Stephan Wolf and the anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Oberlack.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Codebook

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oberlack, C. Diagnosing institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptation to climate change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 22, 805–838 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9699-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9699-z

Keywords

Navigation