Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification of structural breaks in the forest product markets: how sensitive are to changes in the Nordic region?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 22 July 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Forests play a fundamental role in the global carbon cycle and can be managed to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and conserve or sequester carbon. Global policy and environmental changes can affect regional consumption of forest products, as well as inter-regional trade of forest goods and services. This study analyzes global and regional change impacts on the production, consumption and trade of forest products in two Nordic countries, Finland and Sweden. Annual data on removal and trade (1964–2012) for roundwood and sawnwood is used to identify structural breaks based on Chow tests. According to the analysis, the time period is divided into two periods: t1 (1964–1980) and t2 (1981–2012). In the first period, breaks occurred in 1975 and 1976 in the Finnish model and no break is found in the Swedish model. In the second period, we identify breaks in 1991 and 1992 for the Finnish model and in 2004, 2005 and 2006 for the Swedish model. Although our findings have broad empirical support, we do not identify any specific incident as a direct cause of the changes in the consumption and trade patterns of the two types of wood in these countries. The models and analysis presented here can serve as methodological tools for policymakers to better understand the effects of structural changes in the production of forest goods and services in the Nordic region and globally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 22 July 2019

    This paper was published on March 2017, Volume 22, Issue 3, 469���483pp, titled ���Identification of structural breaks in the forest product markets: how sensitive are to changes in the Nordic region?��� with errors referring to the units related to figure 1. Please see below.

References

  • Bengtsson A, Nilsson C (2007) Extreme value modelling of storm damage in Swedish forests. Nat Hazards Earth Sys Sci 7: 515–521. http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/7/515/2007/nhess-7-515-2007.pdf

  • Björn I (1999) Kaikki irti metsästä: metsän käyttö ja muutos taigan reunalla itäisimmässä Suomessa erätaloudesta vuoteen 2000. (Capitalizing on the forest. Use, users and change in the forest in the wilderness economy on the edge of the Taiga in Eastern Finland through the year 2000). (In Finnish). ISBN: 951-710-121-X. Published: Helsinki: Suomen historiallinen seura, 1999

  • Chow GC (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Economet 28:591–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz J (2005) The world’s largest wood stockpile is absolutely insane. http://gizmodo.com/5909847/you-have-never-seen-so-much-wood-in-your-entire-life. Cited 26 August 2014.

  • Díaz-Yáñez O, Mola-Yudego B, Anttila P, Röser D, Asikainen A (2013) Forest chips for energy in Europe: current procurement methods and potentials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:562–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elovirta P (1979) Forestry as an employer in Finland. Silva Fennica 13(3):227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2003) Energy taxes in the Nordic countries—does the polluter pay? National Statistical offices in Norway, Sweden, Finland & Denmark. Final report. http://www.scb.se/statistik/MI/MI1202/2004A01/MI1202_2004A01_BR_MIFT0404.pdf. Cited 22 September 2013

  • Eurostat (2010) http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/File:Forest_area_and_ownership,_2010.png. Cited 24 September 2013

  • FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database) (2013) http://faostat.fao.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=628&lang=en. Cited 16 September 2013

  • Gujarati DN (2004) Basic econometrics (4th ed.), Publisher The McGraw-Hill., pp 273–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Hänninen R (2004) Econometric models in forest sector forecasting. J Forest Econ 10 (2): 57–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2004.07.002

  • Heij C, Boer D-P, Franse P-H, Kloek T, Dijk H-K V (2004) Econometric methods with applications in business and economics. Publisher Oxford University Press Inc, Oxford, pp 362–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetemäki L, Kangas HL, Laturi J, Lintunen J, Uusivuori J (2010) Modeling energy and climate policy in the Finnish forest sector

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson B, Börjesson P, Ericsson K, Nilsson LJ, Svenningsson P (2002) The use of biomass for energy in Sweden—critical factors and lessons learned. IMES/EESS Report 35. Energy Environmental System Studies, Lund, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanam T, Matero J, Mola-Yudego B, Sikanen L, Rahman A (2014) Assessing external factors on substitution of fossil fuel by biofuels: model perspective from the Nordic region. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. DOI 10.1007/s11027-014-9608-x.

  • Kotilainen J, Rytteri T (2011) Transformation of forest policy regimes in Finland since the 19th century. J Hist Geog 37:429–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KSLA (Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry) (2009) The Swedish forestry model. http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/Global/myndigheten/Skog%20och%20miljo/ENGLISH/retrieve_file.pdf. Cited 22 October 2014

  • Lamers P, Hamelinck C, Junginger M, Faaij A (2011) International bioenergy trade—a review of past developments in the liquid biofuel market. Ren Sust Energ Rev 15:2655–2676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson S, Rosenqvist H (1996) Willow production in Sweden—politics, cropping development and economy. Presented at the European Energy Crops Conference, Enschede, the Netherlands, 30 September–1 October 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindelöw Å, Schroeder M (2008) The storm gudrun and the spruce bark beetle in Sweden. Forstschutz Aktuell 44. http://bfw.ac.at/400/pdf/fsaktuell_44_2.pdf

  • Lundmark R (2010) European trade in forest products and fuels. J Forest Econ 16:235–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marland G, Schlamadinger B, Canella L (1997) Forest management for mitigation of CO2 emissions: how much mitigation and who gets the credits? Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 2(2–3):303–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mola-Yudego B, Pelkonen P (2008) The effects of policy incentives in the adoption of willow short rotation coppice for bioenergy in Sweden. Energ Policy 36(8):3062–3068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palo M (2004) Coevolution of forestry and society in Finland: from preindustrial to industrial forestry. http://files.kotisivukone.com/vipustin.kotisivukone.com/Metsat/Maailman_metsat/Matti_Palo/coevolutionpalolastfinal12052006.pdf. Cited 12 October 2014

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (2012) Global Forest, Paper & Packaging Industry Survey 2012 edition—survey of 2011 results. www.pwc.com/fpp. Cited 11 May 2015

  • Savin NE, White KJ (1977) The Durbin-Watson test for serial correlation with extreme sample sizes or many regressors. Econometrica 45:1989–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SFA (Swedish Forest Agency- Skogssstyrelsen) (2007) Forests in Sweden. http://www.svo.se/episerver4templatesSNormalPage.aspx?id=11310. Cited 16 June 2013

  • Siiskonen H (2007) The conflict between traditional and scientific forest management in 20th century Finland. For Ecol Manag 249:125–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toppinen A, Kuuluvainen J (2010) Forest sector modelling in Europe—the state of the art and future research directions. For Pol Econ 12:2–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuokko K (1992) Metsänparantajat kansakunnan asialla 1908–1988. Saarijärvi, ISBN: P9529042671

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) (2013) http://www.unece.org/forests/mis/fp-stats.html. Cited 16 September 2013

  • Vidal J (2006, 8 February) Sweden plans to be world’s first oil-free economy. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2006/feb/08/frontpagenews.oilandpetrol. Cited 16 August 2014

  • Wooldridge JM (2013) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach (5th international ed.). Publisher South-Western Cengage Learning. pp. 70–113. ISBN 978-1-111-53439-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Yrjölä T (2002) Forest management guidelines and practices in Finland, Sweden and Norway. European Forest Institute, Sweden and Norway, p 46, Internal Report No 11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Fortum Foundation (Grant number 201400324) for providing the financial support to complete this paper. The author also would like to thank Mr. Jari Viitanen (The Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE)) and Antti Mutanen (The Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE)) for providing their valuable advice to improve the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tahamina Khanam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khanam, T., Rahman, A., Mola-Yudego, B. et al. Identification of structural breaks in the forest product markets: how sensitive are to changes in the Nordic region?. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 22, 469–483 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9681-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9681-9

Keywords

Navigation