Abstract
Heavy-duty vehicles contribute a significant and increasing portion of global greenhouse gas emissions. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of heavy-duty vehicle efficiency policies in major markets to better inform the global evolution of climate mitigation measures. The paper compiles information from those four nations that have adopted some form of heavy-duty vehicle fuel economy standards—China Japan, United States of America (USA), and Canada—plus the European Union. Despite widespread differences, the study finds that each jurisdiction used simulation modeling to some extent to minimize the cost of chassis-based compliance testing. Further, the study identified several common elements under development for the next round of policies, including (1) how to incorporate trailer manufacturers into existing regulatory structures, (2) how to add new test procedures to fully account for potential benefits from hybrids and advanced transmissions, and (3) how to address the tension between separate test procedures for fuel economy and conventional pollutants. The paper concludes with a discussion of opportunities and challenges for aligning national policies in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird R (2012) Global auto and truck markets, marketing book. Robert W. Baird and Co., Milwaukee, WI
Delorme A, Karbowski D, Sharer P (2009) Evaluation of fuel consumption potential of medium and heavy duty vehicles through modeling and simulation, report to National Academy of Sciences. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, October
Environment Canada (2013) Heavy-duty vehicle and engine greenhouse gas emission regulations, Ottawa, Ontario, P.C. 2013–160: 450–604, Queen's Printer for Canada. http://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2013/2013-03-13/html/sor-dors24-eng.html
EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2011) Greenhouse gas emissions standards and fuel efficiency standards for medium- and heavy-duty engines and vehicles, Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 179, Thursday, September 15, 2011. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-09-15/pdf/2011-20740.pdf
European Commission (2011) Roadmap to a single European transport area—towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system, European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/strategies/2011_white_paper_en.htm
Franzese O (2011) Effect of weight and roadway grade on the fuel economy of class-8 freight trucks, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. http://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/files/Pub33386.pdf
Hill N, Finnegan S, Norris J et al (2011) Reduction and testing of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from heavy-duty vehicles Lot 1: strategy, AEA, Didcot, United Kingdom. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/heavy/studies_en.htm
ICCT (The International Council on Clean Transportation) (2011) Policy update number 14: US greenhouse gas emissions and fuel efficiency standards for medium- and heavy-duty engines and vehicles, Washington, DC. http://theicct.org/us-heavy-duty-vehicle-standards
JAMA (Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association) (2008) Japanese approach on CO2 reduction from automobile
Kodjak D (2011) Policy focus: evolution of heavy-duty vehicle fuel economy and greenhouse gas regulations, carbon management, Vol. 2, No. 3, United Kingdom
Langer T, Khan S (2013) International alignment of fuel efficiency standards for heavy-duty vehicles, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC. http://www.theicct.org/international-alignment-fuel-efficiency-standards-heavy-duty-vehicles
Lowell D, Kamakaté F (2012) Urban off-cycle NO x emissions from Euro IV/V trucks and buses. http://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_WP18_urban_Nox_emissions.pdf
Lutsey N (2014). Prospects for international harmonization for heavy-duty vehicle efficiency. SAE Government-Industry Meeting. Washington, D.C. January 24.
Martinez B (2013) Heavy-duty hybrids working group. Heavy duty vehicle efficiency: aligning standards internationally, integration of engines and powertrains. San Francisco, CA. October 22. http://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/Bernardo%20Martinez%20-GRPE%20HDH%20Overview.pdf
NRC (National Research Council) (2010) Technologies and approaches to reducing fuel consumption of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, Washington, DC. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12845
ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) (2013) Transport energy data book, 32 edn., Oak Ridge, TN. http://cta.ornl.gov/data/index.shtml
Sharpe B, Roeth M (2014) Costs and adoption rates of fuel-saving technologies for trailers in the North American on-road freight sector, The International Council on Clean Transportation Washington, DC, January. http://www.theicct.org/costs-and-adoption-rates-fuel-saving-trailer-technologies
Storey J (2013) The world’s truck manufacturers, a strategic review of finance and operations, 16th edn. Automotive World, United Kingdom
TIAX (2012) European Union greenhouse gas emission reductions potential for heavy-duty vehicles. TIAX, San Francisco, CA
Zheng T (2013) Development of heavy-duty vehicle fuel consumption standards in China, China Automotive Technology and Research Center, Beijing, China
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Nic Lutsey and Rachel Muncrief who consulted on earlier drafts of this paper and provided data for several sections.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kodjak, D., Sharpe, B. & Delgado, O. Evolution of heavy-duty vehicle fuel efficiency policies in major markets. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 20, 755–775 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9632-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9632-5