Skip to main content
Log in

Public health policy, evidence, and causation: lessons from the studies on obesity

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper addresses the question of how different types of evidence ought to inform public health policy. By analysing case studies on obesity, the paper draws lessons about the different roles that different types of evidence play in setting up public health policies. More specifically, it is argued that evidence of difference-making supports considerations about ‘what works for whom in what circumstances’, and that evidence of mechanisms provides information about the ‘causal pathways’ to intervene upon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This data refers to statistics published on open access websites and databases of the European Commission (http://www.hopeproject.eu/index.php?nav_id=), the UK National Health Services (http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/health-and-lifestyles/obesity/statistics-on-obesity-physical-activity-and-diet-england-2010), and the World Health Organisation (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html), all accessed in March 2010.

  2. Information about the programme, the services, the follow-up, related scientific publications, etc. can be found at the sable URL=http://www.mendprogramme.org/hom.

  3. It goes without saying that, when discussing policy, questions about the ethical principles and values that ought to guide interventions inevitably come up. Those are certainly important. However, I want to focus here on a theoretical issue, namely on what constitutes evidence for policy in public health contexts.

  4. Trumble W.R., Stevenson A. (eds), Shorter Oxford English dictionary on historical principles, Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2002.

  5. Information about EFSA, its goals, organisation, documents, campaign and events can be retrieved from its portal, URL=http://www.efsa.europa.eu/.

  6. The document may be accessed at the following stable URL=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:404:0009:0025:EN:PDF

  7. For clarity of exposition I draw a neat distinction between evidence of difference-making and evidence of mechanism. However, in practice this distinction is much more blurred and in fact the two types of evidence are often entangled. For a discussion, see for instance Russo (2011).

  8. I say ‘part of the job’ and ‘by and large’ because this leads us straight into problems of external validity, which are far from being settled. For a novel and thought provoking account of external validity see Steel (2008); for a discussion of the insufficiency of statistics for external validity, see Cartwright (2011).

  9. See for instance the National Childhood Obesity Database 2005–2006 (http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_063565).

  10. See for instance http://ec.europa.eu/eahc/projects/database.html?prjno=2003305, or http://ec.europa.eu/eahc/projects/database.html?prjno=2004313. Notice that, although those projects are listed under policy actions, they are in fact highly exploratory, in that they are meant to provide relevant difference-making information for actions such as prevention in children or particular classes of professionals.

  11. See for instance http://ec.europa.eu/research/leaflets/diabetes/index_en.html. Here is a list of projects funded under the 5th and 6th Framework Programme: http://cordis.europa.eu/lifescihealth/major/diabetes-eu-funding.htm.

  12. See for instance http://ec.europa.eu/health/social_determinants/policy/index_en.htm.

References

  • Bechtel, W., and A. Abrahamsen. 2005. Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36:421–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blass, E.M, ed. 2008. Obesity: Causes, mechanisms, prevention, and treatment. Massachusetts: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bophal, R. 1997. Which book? A comparative review of 25 introductory epidemiology textbooks. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 51:612–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bophal, R. 1999. Paradigms in epidemiology textbooks: In the footsteps of Thomas Khun. American Journal of Public Health, 89(8):1162–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownson, R.C., Baker, E.A., Leet, T.L., and K.N. Gillespie. (2003). Evidence-based public health. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownson, R.C., Gurney, J.G., and G.H. Land. 1999. Evidence-based decision making in public health. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 5(5):86–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. 2008. Evidence for evidenced-based policy. Talk at a home office seminar on criminology and evidence-based policy.

  • Cartwright, N. 2009. Causality, invariance, and policy. In The Oxford handbook of philosophy of economics, chapter 15, ed. Kincaid, H., and, D. Ross, 410–421. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. 2011. Predicting ‘it will work for us’: (way) beyond statistics. In Causality in the sciences, eds. McKay-Illari, P., Russo F., and J. Williamson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantin, A., Costache, G., Sima, A.V., Glavce, C.S., Vladica, M., and D.L. Popov. 2010. Leptin G-2548A and leptin receptor Q223R gene polymorphisms are not associated with obesity in Romanian subjects. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 391(1):282–286.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. 1992. Evidence based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Journal of American Medical Association, 268:2420–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galea, S., Riddle, M., and G.A. Kaplan. 2010. Causal thinking and complex system approaches in epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology 39:97–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, D.A. 2011. The Russo-Williamson thesis and the question of whether smoking causes heart disease. In Causality in the Sciences. eds. McKay Illari, P., Russo, F., and J. Williamson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasziou, P., Chalmers, I., Rawlins, M., and P. McCulloch. 2007. When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise. British Medical Journal 334:349–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greener, J., Douglas, F., van and E. Teijlingen. 2010. More of the same? Conflicting perspectives of obesity causation and intervention amongst overweight people, health professionals and policy makers. Social Science and Medicine 70: 1042–1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt G., and R. Drummond. 2002. Users guides to the medical literature: A manual for evidence-based practice. Chicago: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B. 1965. The environment of disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58:295–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, F. 2008. Obesity epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Illari, P., and J. Williamson. 2010. Function and organization: comparing the mechanisms of protein synthesis and natural selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41:279–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Illari, P.M. 2011. Mechanistic evidence: Disambiguating the Russo-Williamson thesis. International studies in philosophy of science (in press).

  • Kahn, S.E., Hul, R.L., and K.M. Utzschneider. 2006. Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature 444:840–846.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Killoran, A., and M.P. Kelly, eds. 2010. Evidence-based public health. Effectiveness and efficiency. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouchart, M. and F. Russo. 2011. Causal explanation: Recursive decompositions and mechanisms. In Causality in the sciences, eds. McKay-Illari, P., Russo, F., and J. Williamson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry I.J. 1997. Risk factor epidemiology. The Lancet 350(9086):1256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Philipson, T., and R. Posner. 2008. Is the obesity epidemic a public health problem? A decade of research on the economics of obesity. Technical Report Working paper 14010, The National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Porta, M., ed. 2008. A dictionary of epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, fifth edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. and J. Schulkin. 2009. The evolution of obesity. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J. 2005. Descriptive epidemiology and health consequences of childhood obesity. Best Practices & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 19(3):327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J.J., Armstrong, J., Dorosty, A.R., Emmett, P.M., Ness, A., Rogers, I., Steer, C., and A. Sheriff. 2005. Early life risk factors for obesity in childhood: Cohort study. British Medical Journal 330:1357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, F. 2009, Variational causal claims in epidemiology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52(4):540–554.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, F. 2011. Causal webs in epidemiology. Paradigmi (In Press).

  • Russo, F. and J. Williamson. 2007. Interpreting causality in the health sciences. International Studies in Philosophy of Science 21(2):157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, F. and J. Williamson. 2011. Generic versus single-case causal knowledge. the case of autopsy. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1(1):47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rychetnik, L., Hawe, P., Waters, E., Barratt, A., and M. Frommer. 2004. A glossary for evidence based public health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 58:538–545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. 1984. Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, D. 2008. Across the boundaries. Extrapolation in biology and social science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trust for America’s Health. 2008. F as in fat. How obesity policies are failing in America. Technical report. Trust for America’s Health (TFAH) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF).

Download references

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Mike Joffe and Paolo Vineis for drawing my attention to obesity as an interesting case study. Rafael Blanc Moya, Lorenzo Casini, Brendan Clarke, Donald Gillies, Phyllis Illari, Jon Williamson, and two anonymous referees have been very helpful in providing stimulating comments, wise suggestions, and bibliographical references. I also wish to thank the participants of the workshop ‘Multi-level causation’ (IHPST, Paris I, 25–26 March 2010) and of the conference CitBaSS (Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 6–8 October 2010) for their feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Russo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, F. Public health policy, evidence, and causation: lessons from the studies on obesity. Med Health Care and Philos 15, 141–151 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9335-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9335-y

Keywords

Navigation