Abstract
The Article focuses on the concept of social solidarity, as it is used in the Report of the International Bioethics Committee On Social Responsibility and Health. It is argued that solidarity plays a major role in supporting the whole framework of social responsibility, as presented by the IBC. Moreover, solidarity is not limited to members of particular groups, but potentially extended to all human beings on the basis of their inherent dignity; this sense of human solidarity is a necessary presupposition for a genuinely universalistic morality of justice and human rights.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The word already features in the 1694 edition of the Dictionnaire de l’Académie française.
R. Tuomela talks about “we-intentions”, contending that collective agency supervenes on individual agency (Tuomela 2005).
One noteworthy exception is the considerable number of papers collected in ter Meulen et al. 2001.
References
Arnsperger, C., and Y. Varoufakis. 2003. Toward a theory of solidarity. Erkenntnis: An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy 59: 157–188.
Bayertz, K. (ed.). 1999a. Solidarity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bayertz, K. 1999b. Four uses of “Solidarity”. In Solidarity, ed. K. Bayertz, 3–28. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Brock, D.W. 2001. Some questions about the moral responsibilities of drug companies. Developing World Bioethics 1: 33–37.
Daniels, N. 2008. Just health. Meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Durkheim, E. 1893. De la division du travail social (Engl. transl. The Division of Labour in Society, 1984). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dworkin, R. 1977. Justice and rights. In Taking rights seriously, 150–183. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
General Conference of UNESCO. 2005. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, adopted on 19 October 2005 by the 33rd session of the General Conference of UNESCO (see at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/bioethics-and-human-rights/).
Geras, N. 1995. Solidarity in the conversation of humankind. The ungroundable Liberalism of Richard Rorty. London: Verso.
Habermas, J. 1992. Justice and solidarity: On the discussion concerning stage 6. Philosophical Forum 21: 32–35.
Habermas, J. 1998. The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Heyd, D. 2007. Justice and solidarity: The contractarian case against global justice. Journal of Social Philosophy 38: 112–130.
Jaspers, K. 1946. Die Schuldfrage (Engl. transl. The Question of German Guilt, 1961). New York: Capricorn.
May, L. 2007. The International Community, Solidarity and the Duty to Aid. Journal of Social Philosophy 38: 185–203.
Narveson, J. 2002. Collective responsibility. Journal of Ethics 6: 179–198.
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Report of the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO (IBC). 2010. On social responsibility and health, Social and Human Sciences Sector, Division of Ethics of Science and Technology, (see at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001878/187899e.pdf).
Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. 1998. Human rights, rationality, and sentimentality. In Truth and progress. philosophical papers, vol 3, 167–185. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
Schülenk, U., and R.E. Ashcroft. 2002. Affordable access to essential medication in developing countries: Conflicts between ethical and economic imperatives. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27: 179–195.
Stjernø, S. 2009. Solidarity in Europe: The history of an idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sverdlik, S. 1987. Collective responsibility. Philosophical Studies 51: 61–76.
ter Meulen, R., W. Arts, and R. Muffels (eds.). 2001. Solidarity in health and social care in Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tönnies, F. 1887, Gemainschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie (Engl. transl. Community and Civil Society, 2001). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tuomela, R. 2005. We-intentions revisited. Philosophical Studies 125: 327–369.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reichlin, M. The role of solidarity in social responsibility for health. Med Health Care and Philos 14, 365–370 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9320-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9320-5