The hermeneutic challenge of genetic engineering: Habermas and the transhumanists
- Andrew Edgar
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact that developments in transhumanist technologies may have upon human cultures (and thus upon the lifeworld), and to do so by exploring a potential debate between Habermas and the transhumanists. Transhumanists, such as Nick Bostrom, typically see the potential in genetic and other technologies for positively expanding and transcending human nature. In contrast, Habermas is a representative of those who are fearful of this technology, suggesting that it will compound the deleterious effects of the colonisation of the lifeworld, further constraining human autonomy and undermining the meaningfulness of the lifeworld by expanding the technological control and manipulation of humanity. It will be argued that these opposed positions are grounded in fundamentally different understandings of the consequences of scientific and technological advance. On one level, the transhumanists remain confident that the lifeworld has within it the resources necessary to find meaning and purpose in a society deeply infused by genetic technology. Habermas disagrees. On another level, the difference is articulated by Horkheimer and Adorno in Dialectic of Enlightenment, primarily by challenging what may be understood as a Baconian faith in science as a project for the domination of nature (where nature is an infinitely malleable material, to be dominated and shaped, without adverse consequences, purely for the purposes of human survival). While the transhumanists broadly embrace this faith, Habermas returns to something akin to Horkheimer and Adorno’s pessimistic scepticism.
- Badmingtom, N. 2000. Posthumanism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
- Bostrom, N. 2002. Existential risks: Analyzing human extinction scenarios and related hazards. Journal of Evolution and Technology 9: 1–37.
- Bostrom, N. 2005a. A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology 14(1): 1–25.
- Bostrom, N. 2005b. In defense of posthuman dignity. Bioethics 19(3): 202–214. CrossRef
- Habermas, J. 1970. On systematically distorted communication. Inquiry 13: 360–375. CrossRef
- Habermas, J. 1972. Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann.
- Habermas, J. 1976a. Theory and practice. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- Habermas, J. 1976b. Legitimation crisis. London: Heinemann.
- Habermas, J. 1979. Communication and the evolution of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action, vol. 1, reason and the rationalisation of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Habermas, J. 1987. The Theory of communicative action, vol. 2, lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Habermas, J. 1992. Postmetaphysical thinking: Philosophical essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Habermas, J. 2001. The postnational constellation: Political essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Habermas, J. 2003. The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity.
- Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
- Horkheimer, M., and T.W. Adorno. 2002. Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Hughes, J. 2004. Citizen cyborg: Why democratic societies must respond to the redesigned human of the future. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
- Kaku, M. 2007. Perspectives: Are we becoming gods? New Scientist, issue 2628, (3rd November): 58–59.
- Kant, I. 1933. The critique of pure reason. Trans. N. Kemp-Smith. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
- Ovid. 1955. Metamorphoses. Trans. Mary M. Innes. Harmondsworth, Penguin.
- Pickstock, C. 2000. Liturgy, art and politics. Modern Theology 16(2): 159–180. CrossRef
- Rehg, W. 1996. Translator’s introduction. In Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, ed. J. Habermas. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Svenaeus, F. 2009. The ethics of self change: Becoming oneself by way of antidepressants or psychotherapy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. doi:10.1007/s11019-009-9190-2.
- The hermeneutic challenge of genetic engineering: Habermas and the transhumanists
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Volume 12, Issue 2 , pp 157-167
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Genetic engineering
- Dialectic of enlightenment
- Colonisation of the lifeworld
- Industry Sectors
- Andrew Edgar (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Applied Ethics, Cardiff University, Humanities Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff, CF10 3EU, Wales, UK