Abstract
The prevention, treatment and management of disease are closely linked to how the causes of a particular disease are explained. For multi-factorial conditions, the causal explanations are inevitably complex and competing models may exist to explain the same condition. Selecting one particular causal explanation over another will carry practical and ethical consequences that are acutely relevant for health policy. In this paper our focus is two-fold; (i) the different models of causal explanation that are put forward within current scientific literature for the high and rising prevalence of the common complex conditions of coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D); and (ii) how these explanations are taken up (or not) within national health policy guidelines. We examine the causal explanations for these two conditions through a systematic database search of current scientific literature. By identifying different causal explanations we propose a three-tier taxonomy of the most prominent models of explanations: (i) evolutionary, (ii) lifecourse, and (iii) lifestyle and environment. We elaborate this taxonomy with a micro-level thematic analysis to illustrate how some explanations are semantically and rhetorically foregrounded over others. We then investigate the uptake of the scientific causal explanations in health policy documents with regard to the prevention and management recommendations of current National Service Frameworks for CAD and T2D. Our findings indicate a lack of congruence between the complexity and frequent overlap of causal explanations evident in the scientific literature and the predominant focus on lifestyle recommendations found in the mainstream health policy documents.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker D.J.P. (1990). The Fetal and Infant Origins of Adult Disease. British Medical Journal 301(6761):1111
Barker D.J.P. (1995). Fetal Origins of Coronary Heart Disease. British Medical Journal 311(6998):171–174
Barker D.J.P. (2001) A New Model for the Origins of Chronic Disease. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):31–35
Barker D.J.P., Gluckman P.D., Godfrey K.M., Harding J.E., Owens J.A., Robinson J.S. (1993). Fetal Nutrition and Cardiovascular Disease in Adult Life. The Lancet 341(8850):938–941
Barker D.J.P., Osmond C. (1986). Infant Mortality, Childhood Nutrition, and Ischaemic Heart Disease in England and Wales. The Lancet 1(8489):1077–1081
Cabinet Office: 1999, `Modernising Government, White Paper Cm 4310. London: The Stationery Office
de Hoop H., de Swart P. (2004). ‘Contrast in Discourse: Guest Editors’ Introduction’, Journal of Semantics 21(2):87–93
Department of Health: 2000, ‘National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease’, http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/fs/en
Department of Health: 2001, ‘National Service Framework for Diabetes: Standards’, http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/fs/en
Diamond J. (2003). The Double Puzzle of Diabetes. Nature 423(6940):599–602
Faergeman O. (2003) Coronary Artery Disease Genes, Drugs and the Agricultural Connection. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Flier F.L., De Vries Robbé P.F. (1999). Nosology and Causal Necessity; the Relation Between Defining a Disease and Discovering Its Necessary Cause. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20(6):577–588
Frayling T.M., Hattersley A.T. (2001). The Role of Genetic Susceptibility in the Association of Low Birth Weight with Type 2 Diabetes. British Medical Bulletin 60(1):89–101
Greenhalgh T. (1997). How to Read a Paper: Papers That Summarise Other Papers (Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). British Medical Journal 315(7109):672–675
Hales C.N., Barker D.J.P. (2001). The Thrifty Phenotype Hypothesis. British Medical Bulletin 60(1):5–20
Harding J.E. (2001). The Nutritional Basis of the Fetal Origins of Adult Disease. International Journal of Epidemiology 30(1):15–23
Helman, C.: 1978, ‘Feed a Cold, Starve a Fever’, Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 2, 107 (Cited in Pill and Stott)
Hofman B. (2001) Complexity of the Concept of Disease as Shown Through Rival Theoretical Frameworks. Theoretical Medicine 22(3):211–236
Johnstone B. (2002). Discourse Analysis. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
Karhausen L.R. (2000). Causation: The Elusive Grail of Epidemiology, Medicine. Health Care and Philosophy 3(1):59–67
Klupa T., Malecki M.T., Pezzolesi M., Ji L., Curtis S., Langefeld C.D., Rich S.S., Warram J.H., Krolewski A.S. (2000). Further Evidence for a Susceptibility Locus for Type 2 Diabetes on Chromosome 20q13.1–q13.2. Diabetes 49(12):2212–2216
Mackie J. (1974). The Cement of the Universe: A Study in Causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Malecki M.T., Klupa T. (2005). Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: From Genes to Disease. Pharmacological Reports 57(Suppl.):20–32
Mann J.I. (2002). Diet and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. The Lancet 360(9335):783–789
Mann W., Thompson S. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Towards a Functional Theory of Text Organization. TEXT 8 (3):243–281
Marmot M.G., Smith G.D., Stansfeld S., Patel C., North F., Head J., White I., Brunner E., Feeney A. (1991). Health Inequalities Among British Civil Servants; the Whitehall II Study. The Lancet 337(8754):1387–1393
McDermott R (1998). Ethics, Epidemiology and the Thrifty Gene: Biological Determinism as a Health Hazard. Social Science & Medicine 47(9):1189–1195
Mill J.S. (2002 [1891]). A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. University Press of the Pacific, Honolulu
Myers G. (1990). Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Myers G. (1991). Stories and styles in two molecular biology review articles. In: Bazerman C., Paradis J. (eds). Textual Dynamics of the Professions. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Neel J.V. (1962). ‘Diabetes Mellitus: a “Thrifty” Genotype Rendered Detrimental by “Progress”?’, American Journal of Human Genetics 14:353–362
Neel J.V. (1994). Physician to the Gene Pool: Genetic Lessons and Other Stories. John Wiley, New York
Neel J.V. (1999). The “Thrifty Genotype” in 1998. Nutrition Reviews 57(5 Pt 2):S2–9
Philippe P., Mansi O. (1998). Nonlinearity in the Epidemiology of Complex Health and Disease Processes. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19(6):591–607
Pill R., Stott N.H.C. (1982). Concepts of Illness Causation and Responsibility: Some Preliminary Data from a Sample of Working Class Mothers. Social Science & Medicine 16(1):43–52
Porter R. (1997). The Greatest Benefit to Mankind. A Medical History of Humanity from Antiquity to the Present. HarperCollins Publishers, London
Rees J (2002). Complex Disease and The New Clinical Sciences. Science 296(5568):698–701
Sanchez P.L., Morinigo J.L., Pabon P., Martin F., Piedra I., Palacios I.F., Martin-Luengo C. (2004). Prognostic Relations Between Inflammatory Markers and Mortality in Diabetic Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Heart 90(3):264–269
Sarangi S., Clarke A. (2002). Constructing an Account by Contrast in Counselling for Childhood Genetic Testing. Social Science & Medicine 54(2):295–308
Severinsen M. (2001). ‘Principles Behind Definitions of Diseases – A Criticism of the Principle of Disease Mechanism and the Development of a Pragmatic Alternative’, Theoretical Medicine 22(4):319–336
Smith D. (1978). K is Mentally ill: The Anatomy of a Factual Account. Sociology 12(1):23–53
Smith K. (2001). A Disease by Any Other Name: Musings on the Concept of a Genetic Disease. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4(19):30
Sontag S. (1979). Illness as Metaphor. Allen Lane, London
Sridhar G.R., Madhu K. (2001). Stress in the Cause and Course of Diabetes. International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries 21:113–119
Strategic Policy Making Team (SPMT) 1999, Professional Policy Making for the Twenty-first Century. London: Cabinet Office
Tyreman, S.: ‘Causes of Illness in Clinical Practice: A Conceptual Exploration’, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy (DOI 10.1007/s11019-006-9006-6)
Weiner, K.: 2004, ‘A Genomic Future for Coronary heart disease’, A Paper Presented at ‘Genomics and Society’ 1st CESAGen Int. Conf., Royal Society, London
Acknowledgements
Research for this paper was conducted as part of a Wellcome Trust funded research project called ‘Explanations in Genetics – Causality and Accountability in Complex Disorders’ and an early draft of the paper was presented at the Elsagen/ESPMH conference ‘Genetics and Health Care’ in Reykjavik, Iceland, 25–28 August 2004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Räisänen, U., Bekkers, MJ., Boddington, P. et al. The causation of disease – The practical and ethical consequences of competing explanations. Med Health Care Philos 9, 293–306 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-9007-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-9007-5