Selection of optimal parameters of the electronic probe of a scanning electron microscope in measurement of the geometric parameters of objects by means of a defocusing probe
First Online: 27 November 2012 Received: 18 October 2011 DOI:
Cite this article as: Alzoba, V.V., Kuzin, A.Y., Larionov, Y.V. et al. Meas Tech (2012) 55: 908. doi:10.1007/s11018-012-0059-z
Estimation of the procedural error of measurements of the geometric parameters of objects by a method involving defocusing of the electron probe of a scanning electron microscope is carried out. The procedural error is caused by the dependence of the results of measurements on the parameters of the probe. It is shown that this error may be reduced by selecting optimal parameters of the probe at which the actual measurement conditions correspond in the best way possible to the requirements of the computational model.
Keywords scanning electron microscope defocusing method
Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 8, pp. 40–43, August, 2012.
David C. Joy,
Monte Carlo Modeling for Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis
, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995).
Ch. P. Volk et al., “Problems in the measurement of the geometric characteristics of the electron probe of a scanning electron microscope,” in:
Linear Measurements in the Micrometric and Nanometric Ranges in Microelectronics and Nanotechnology: Proc. IOFAN [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (2006), pp. 77–120.
M. N. Fillipov et al., “SEM probe defocusing method of measurement of linear sizes of nanorelief elements,”
, 7621161-9 (2010).
M. A. Danilova et al., “A test object with a line width less than 10 nm for scanning electron microscopy,”
, No. 8, 20–23 (2008);
, No. 8, 839–843 (2008).
CrossRef Google Scholar
Yu. A. Novikov et al., “Test objects with right-angled and trapezoidal profiles of the relief elements,”
, 704208-1–704208-12 (2008).
Google Scholar Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012