Notes
One influential proposal, for example, argues that health is a special good of justice because it determines people’s normal functioning, and in turn, the Rawlsian principle of fair equality of opportunity [2]. Others argue for equality in terms of a sufficient level of human wellbeing, with health conceived as one of its several irreducible dimensions [3]. Still others seek equity with respect to human capabilities, including the capability to be healthy, which is seen as a crucial condition of human life [4–6].
References
Butterweck, Kim. 2015. Holman wins religion award for “Beholden: Religion, Global Health and Human Rights.” December 3. http://grawemeyer.org/holman-wins-religion-award-for-beholden-religion-global-health-and-human-rights/. Accessed Sept 5, 2016.
Daniels, Norman. 2008. Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Powers, Madison, and Ruth Faden. 2006. Social justice: The moral foundations of public health and health policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 2004. Why health equity? In Public health, ethics, and equity, ed. Sudhir Anand, Fabienne Peter, and Amartya Sen, 21–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Venkatapuram, Sridhar. 2011. Health justice. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Ruger, Jennifer Prah. 2010. Health and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biehl, João, and Adriana Petryna (eds.). 2013. When people come first: Critical studies in global health. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Callahan, Daniel. 1973. The WHO definition of “health”. The Hastings Center Studies 1 (3): 77–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, D.T. Susan R. Holman: Beholden: religion, global health, and human rights . Theor Med Bioeth 38, 83–87 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9392-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9392-6