Abstract
Personhood constitutes the pivotal point in the abortion debate. There exists a diversity of views as to when foetal personhood actually starts—from conception and implantation to viability and even birth. One perspective that has lost support for decades is that of quickening, a stance associated with Lord Ellenborough’s 1803 Act. This paper attempts to put quickening back into the limelight, albeit through a new interpretation. After discussing its philosophy and underpinning rationale, I will assess a number of arguments that have been directed against quickening as a viable point of distinction. I conclude by suggesting that according to modern proponents of quickening proponents, rational soul ensoulment begins after a certain degree of cerebral cortical formation has been realized, thus marking foetal volition, which promotes foetal interests, for the first time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Locke believed in the prohibition of abortion at whatever stage as a matter of first principles. However, on the question as to when the rational soul or ‘I’— and thus personhood may I add—arises, he writes “and it is so hard to imagine the rational soul should presently inhabit the yet unformed embryo…” (see [17, p. 127]). Interestingly, the formed foetus according to Hippocrates, and therefore maybe Locke as well, occurred at 3-4 months (depending on the gender), a stance closely linked with quickening (see [2, p. 20]).
References
McMahan, Jeff. 2002. The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, David A. 2004. The soul of the embryo: An enquiry into the status of the human embryo in the Christian tradition. London: Continuum.
Sekaleshfar, Farrokh B. 2008. Abortion perspectives of Shiah Islam. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2 (3): 1–15.
Aristotle, 1986. De Anima (On the Soul). Trans: H. Lawson-Tancred. London: Penguin.
Aquinas, Thomas. 1999. On human nature. Trans: T.S. Hibbs. Indiana: Hackett Publishing.
Morton, Peter A. 1997. A historical introduction to the philosophy of mind. New York: Broadview Press.
Cooper, John M., ed. 1997. Plato: Complete works. Trans: D.J. Zeyl. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Aristotle, 1979. On the generation of animals. Trans: A.L. Peck. MA: Harvard University Press.
Aristotle. 1994. On the history of animals. Trans: D.W. Thompson. Internet Classics Archive. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/history_anim.html. Accessed 4 March 2009.
Eberl, Jason T. 2006. Thomistic principles and bioethics. London: Routledge.
Jones, David A. 2005. The human embryo in the Christian tradition: A reconsideration. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 710–714.
Paul, John, II. Evangelium vitae. 2003. In Ethical issues in modern medicine, 6th ed., ed. B. Steinbock, John D. Arras, and Alex J. London, 461–463. New York: McGraw Hill.
Keown, John. 1988. Abortion, doctors and the law. Cambridge: CUP.
Connery, John R. 1979. Abortion and the duty to preserve life. Theological Studies 40 (2): 318–333.
Burgess, J.A., and S.A. Tawia. 1996. When did you first begin to feel it?—Locating the beginning of human consciousness. Bioethics 10 (1): 1–26.
Locke, John. 1964. An essay concerning human understanding. London: OUP.
Short, B.W. 2004. The healing philosopher: John Locke’s medical ethics. Issues in law and medicine 20 (2): 103–154.
Thomson, J.J. 1971. A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1): 47–66.
Gillon, Raanan. 2001. Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’? Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (Supplement II): ii 6–7.
Krimmel, H.T., and M.J. Foley. 1977. Abortion: An inspection into the nature of human life and potential consequences of legalizing its destruction. University of Cincinnati Law Review 46: 725–821.
Boonin, David. 2003. A defense of abortion. Cambridge: CUP.
Morokuma, S., et al. 2004. Fetal habituation correlates with functional brain development. Behavioural Brain Research 153: 459–463.
Arabin, B., R. Van Lingen, W. Baerts, and J. Van Eyck. 1999. The development of the senses. In Fetal medicine, ed. F.A. Chervenak and A. Kurjak, 171–180. New York: Parthenon Publishing.
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sekaleshfar, F.B. Reinterpreting the ‘quickening’ perspective in the abortion debate. Theor Med Bioeth 30, 161–171 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-009-9102-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-009-9102-8