Putting the ‘empiricism’ in ‘logical empiricism’: the director’s cut
- Greg Frost-Arnold
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In 1992, Thomas Uebel set the standard for scholarship on both Neurath and the protocol-sentence debate in Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within: The Emergence of Neurath’s Naturalism in the Vienna Circle’s Protocol-Sentence Debate. That book was an in-depth study of the logical empiricists’ protocol-sentence debate, which “concerned the form, content, and status of scientific evidence statements” (1). Put otherwise, this debate addressed how best to understand those scientific activities (including linguistic activities) that make the empirical sciences empirical. The book reviewed here, Empiricism at the Crossroads: The Vienna Circle’s Protocol-Sentence Debate, is a heavily revised and expanded version of that earlier work.
Before delving into the content of the book, let us ask: how does the new version differ from the old? First, there are light revisions throughout, including small expository additions or deletions, and additional citations of primary and secondary sources. Sec
- Carnap, Rudolf. 1932/1959. Psychology in physical language. In Logical positivism, ed. A.J. Ayer, 165–198. Simon & Schuster.
- Stern, David. 2007. Wittgenstein, the Vienna circle, and physicalism: A reassessment. In The Cambridge companion to logical empiricism, ed. A. Richardson, and T. Uebel, 305–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Putting the ‘empiricism’ in ‘logical empiricism’: the director’s cut
Volume 20, Issue 2 , pp 373-376
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, NY, 14456, USA