Abstract
Arches are among the most widely used and characterizing elements in masonry structures, particularly in historical buildings and churches. They are susceptible to severe damage due to seismic actions, excessive vertical loads, or support settlements. While an exhaustive literature is available for the behaviour of arched structures under vertical loads and support settlements, less attention has been devoted to their behaviour under horizontal seismic actions. In this paper, limit analysis approach to circular buttressed arches under horizontal loads is applied through a procedure developed by the authors based on non-linear programming technique. The suggested procedure is automatic, and structural engineers can easily implement it in a computer algebra system to identify the failure mechanism and the position of the hinges that minimises the horizontal load multiplier.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brandonisio G, Mele E, De Luca A (2015) Closed form solution for predicting the horizontal capacity of masonry portal frames through limit analysis and comparison with experimental test results. Eng Fail Anal 55:246–270
Kazinczy G (1914) Kìsérletek Befalazott Tartòkkal (Experiments with clamped girders). Betonszemle, vol II (in Hungarian)
Baker JF (1949) A review of recent investigations into the behaviour of steel frames in the plastic range. J Inst Civ Eng 31(3):224–240
Onat ET, Prager W (1953) Limit analysis of arches. J Mech Phys Solids 1(2):77–89
Kooharian A (1952) Limit analysis of voussoir (segmental) and concrete arches. J Am Concr Inst 24(4):317–328
Heyman J (1966) The stone skeleton. Int J Solids Struct 2:249–279
Heyman J (1969) The safety of masonry arches. Int J Mech Sci 11:363–385
Heyman J (1982) The masonry arch. Ellis Horwood, Chichester
Huerta S (2008) The analysis of masonry architecture: a historical approach. Archit Sci Rev 51(4):297–328
Huerta S (2001) Mechanics of masonry vaults: the equilibrium approach. In: Lourenço PB, Roca P (eds) Historical constructions. Possibilities of numerical and experimental techniques. University of Minho, Guimaraes, pp 47–69
Block P, DeJong M, Ochsendorf J (2006) As hangs the flexible line: equilibrium of masonry arches. Nexus Netw J 8(2):13–24
Angelillo M (1993) Constitutive relations for no-tension materials. Meccanica 28:195–202
Milani E, Milani G, Tralli A (2008) Limit analysis of masonry vaults by means of curved shell finite elements and homogenization. Int J Solids Struct 45(20):5258–5288
Como M, Grimaldi A (1983) Analisi limite di pareti murarie sotto spinta. In: Quaderni di teoria e tecnica delle strutture. Università di Napoli, Istituto di Tecnica delle Costruzioni (in Italian)
Como M (2013) Statics of historic masonry constructions. Springer, Berlin
Giordano A, De Luca A, Mele E, Romano A (2007) A simple formula for predicting the horizontal capacity of masonry portal frames. Eng Struct 29:2109–2123
Lucibello G, Brandonisio G, Mele E, De Luca A (2013) Seismic damage and performance of Palazzo Centi after L’Aquila earthquake: a paradigmatic case study of effectiveness of mechanical steel ties. Eng Fail Anal 34:407–430
De Lucia R, Giordano A, Mele E, De Luca A (2009) Portanza Orizzontale di Archi in Muratura. In: XIII Convegno Anidis 2009, L’Ingegneria Simica in Italia, Bologna, 28 Giugno–2 Luglio 2009 (in Italian)
De Luca A, Giordano A, Mele E (2004) A simplified procedure for assessing the seismic capacity of masonry arches. Eng Struct 26:1915–1929
Giordano A, De Luca A, Mele E, Romano A (2006) Simplified evaluation of the horizontal capacity of masonry arches. Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, New Delhi
Mazziotti A, Brandonisio G, Lucibello G, De Luca A (2016) Structural analysis of the basket dome in the chapel of the holy shroud by Guarino Guarini. Int J Archit Herit. doi:10.1080/15583058.2016.1222463
Dimitri R, Tornabene F (2015) A parametric investigation of the seismic capacity for masonry arches and portals of different shapes. Eng Fail Anal 52:1–34
Decanini L, De Sortis A, Goretti A, Langenbach R, Mollaioli F, Rasulo A (2004) Performance of masonry buildings during the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 20:S191–S220
Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2004) Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches. Part 2: statistical analysis of surveyed data and methods for risk analysis. Earthq Spectra 20:395–412
D’Ayala DF, Pagnoni S (2011) Assessment and analysis of damage in L’Aquila historic city centre after 6th April 2009. Bull Earthq Eng 9:81–104
Dizhur D, Ingham J, Moon L, Griffith M, Schultz A, Senaldi I, Magenes G et al (2011) Performance of masonry buildings and churches in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Bull NZ Soc Earthq Eng 44(4):279–296
Lagomarsino S (2009) Damage assessment of churches after L’Aquila earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 2012:73–92
Brandonisio G, Lucibello G, Mele E, De Luca A (2013) Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Eng Fail Anal 34(2013):693–714
Sorrentino L, Liberatore L, Decanini LD, Liberatore D (2013) The performance of churches in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 12(5):2299–2331
Gilbert M (2007) Limit analysis applied to masonry arch bridges: state-of-the-art and recent developments. In: ARCH’07—5th international conference on arch bridges, pp 13–28
Livesley RK (1978) Limit analysis of structures formed from rigid blocks. Int J Numer Methods Eng 12(12):1853–1871
Livesley RK (1992) A computational model for the limit analysis of three-dimensional masonry structures. Meccanica 27:161–172
Baggio C, Trovalusci P (1998) Limit analysis for no-tension and frictional three-dimensional discrete systems. Mech Struct Mach 26(3):287–304
Baggio C, Trovalusci P (2000) Collapse behaviour of three-dimensional brick-block systems using non linear programming. Struct Eng Mech 10(2):181–195
Lasdon LS, Waren AD, Jain A, Ratner M (1978) Design and testing of a generalized reduced gradient code for nonlinear programming. ACM Trans Math Softw (TOMS) 4(1):34–50
Monti G, Vailati M, Gaetani A, Paolone A (2014) Analytical models for seismic assessment and strengthening of masonry arches. In: 9th International masonry conference 2014, Guimarães
Foraboschi P (2004) Strengthening of masonry arches with fiber-reinforced polymer strips. J Compos Constr 8:191–202
Cancelliere I, Imbimbo M, Sacco E (2010) Experimental tests and numerical modeling of reinforced masonry arches. Eng Struct 32(3):776–792
DeJong M, De Lorenzis L, Adams S, Ochsendorfd J (2008) Rocking stability of masonry arches in seismic regions. Earthq Spectra 24(4):847–865
Calderini C, Lagomarsino S (2014) Seismic response of masonry arches reinforced by tie-rods: static tests on a scale model. J Struct Eng 141(5)
Funding
This study was funded by Italian Civil Protection Department—Presidency of the Council of Ministers in the context of ReLUIS IV—Research Project 2015 “Rete di Laboratori Universitari Ingegneria Sismica, Task: Masonry Structures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Appendix
Appendix
The expressions for the evaluation of weights, horizontal and vertical components of displacements of the centroids of rigid bodies involved in the kinematical chains of Fig. 7 are provided in the following subsections. In particular, with reference to the failure mechanisms II and III of Fig. 6, these expressions can be used in Eq. (1) for obtaining the horizontal collapse multipliers λ of the masonry buttressed arch.
1.1 Mechanism II (global mechanism)
From simple geometrical considerations on the rotation angles of the three rigid bodies of the mechanism II shown in Fig. 7c, d, the follow relationships among Ψ A , Ψ B and Ψ C can be found:
where
hence, we have (angles in radians):
and the corresponding weights can be evaluated as follows:
where γ is the weight per unit volume of masonry material, s A is the thickness of the arch, and s P is the thickness of the pier wall.
1.2 Mechanism III (mixed mechanism)
The expressions to calculate the rotation angles Ψ A , Ψ B and Ψ C of the rigid bodies involved in the failure mechanism III of Fig. 7e are:
where d III is the horizontal distance between the rotational centres (1,2) = B and (2) reported in Fig. 7e:
and
Therefore, the horizontal and vertical components of the displacements of the centroids of the three rigid bodies involved in the mechanism III in Fig. 7f can be evaluated through the following formulas:
The weights of the three rigid blocks of buttressed arch to consider for the application of Eq. (1) at the mechanism III, can be calculated by using the following expressions (angles in radians):
where γ is the weight per unit volume of masonry material, s A is the thickness of the arch, and s P is the thickness of the pier wall.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brandonisio, G., Mele, E. & De Luca, A. Limit analysis of masonry circular buttressed arches under horizontal loads. Meccanica 52, 2547–2565 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0609-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0609-6