Skip to main content
Log in

A new test rig for static and dynamic evaluation of knee motion based on a cable-driven parallel manipulator loading system

  • Recent Progress and Novel Applications of Parallel Mechanisms
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evaluation of the knee joint behavior is fundamental in many applications, such as joint modeling, prosthesis and orthosis design. A new test rig for in vitro analysis of the knee joint behavior is presented in this paper. Based on a cable-driven parallel manipulator loading system, the rig can simulate general loading conditions, such as clinical tests and common daily activities, in a wide range of flexion angles. The joint natural response in terms of movement is measured by an optoelectronic system. Furthermore, the new rig allows the estimation of the contribution of the principal leg muscles in guaranteeing the equilibrium of the joint. Despite its simplicity and low cost, the rig presents good accuracy, repeatability and versatility that allow its application on a wide range of specimen sizes. It represents an advanced application of cable-driven parallel robots for in vitro motion analysis of the knee subjected to general loads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson FC, Pandy MG (2001) Dynamic optimization of human walking. J Biomech Eng 123(5):381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BC (1998) The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 365:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding B, Stanley RM, Cazzolato BS, Costi JJ (2011) Real-time fpga control of a hexapod robot for 6-dof biomechanical testing. In: Proceedings of IECON 2011–37th annual conference on IEEE industrial electronics society, pp 252–257

  4. Fujie H, Mabuchi K, Woo SL-Y, Arai S, Tsukamoto Y, Livesay GA (1993) The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng 115(3):211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grood ES, Stowers SF, Noyes FR (1988) Limits of movement in the human knee. J Bone Joint Surg 70–A(1):88–97

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guess TM, Stylianou A (2012) Simulation of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency in a musculoskeletal model with anatomical knees. Open Biomed Eng J 6:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirschfeld H, Thorsteinsdottir M, Olsson E (1999) Coordinated ground forces exerted by buttocks and feet are adequately programmed for weight transfer during sit-to-stand. J Neurophysiol 82(6):3021–3029

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leardini A, Chiari L, Croce UD, Cappozzo A (2005) Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry: part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait Posture 21(2):212–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maletsky LP, Hillberry BM (2005) Simulating dynamic activities using a five-axis knee simulator. J Biomech Eng 127(1):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sancisi N, Zannoli D, Parenti-Castelli V, Belvedere C, Leardini A (2011) A one-degree-of-freedom spherical mechanism for human knee joint modelling. Proc Institut Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 225(8):725–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Varadarajan KM, Harry RE, Johnson T, Li G (2009) Can in vitro systems capture the characteristic differences between the flexionextension kinematics of the healthy and tka knee? Med Eng Phys 31(11):899–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wunschel M, Leasure JM, Dalheimer P, Kraft N, Wulker N, Muller O (2013) Differences in knee joint kinematics and forces after posterior cruciate retaining and stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee 20:416–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yildirim G, Walker PS, Boyer J (2009) Total knees designed for normal kinematics evaluated in an up-and-down croucihng machine. J Orthop Res 27:1022–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zannoli D, Sancisi N, Parenti Castelli V (2012) A simple rig for precise measurements of the knee and ankle joint motion under static loading conditions. In: Proceedings of Sesta Giornata di Studio Ettore Funaioli, pp 160–165

  16. Zavatsky AB (1997) A kinematic-freedom analysis of a flexed-knee-stance testing rig. J Biomech 30(3):277–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the Health Sciences and Technologies Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Research (HST-ICIR) for supporting this research, and thank Dr. Benedetta Baldisserri and Dr. Diego Zannoli for their contribution to the construction of the rig.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margherita Forlani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forlani, M., Sancisi, N., Conconi, M. et al. A new test rig for static and dynamic evaluation of knee motion based on a cable-driven parallel manipulator loading system. Meccanica 51, 1571–1581 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0124-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0124-1

Keywords

Navigation