Skip to main content
Log in

Expectiles, Omega Ratios and Stochastic Ordering

  • Published:
Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we introduce the expectile order, defined by X e Y if e α (X) ≤e α (Y) for each α ∈ (0, 1), where e α denotes the α-expectile. We show that the expectile order is equivalent to the pointwise ordering of the Omega ratios, and we derive several necessary and sufficient conditions. In the case of equal means, the expectile order can be easily characterized by means of the stop-loss transform; in the more general case of different means we provide some sufficient conditions. In contrast with the more common stochastic orders such as ≤ s t and ≤ c x , the expectile order is not generated by a class of utility functions and is not closed with respect to convolutions. As an illustration, we compare the ≤ s t , ≤ i c x and ≤ e orders in the family of Lomax distributions and compare Lomax distributions fitted to real world data of natural disasters in the U.S. caused by different sources of weather risk like storms or floods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J-M, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Financ 9:203–228

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Azzalini A (1985) A class of distribution which includes the normal ones. Scand J Stat 12:171–178

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bäuerle N, Müller A (2006) Stochastic Orders and Risk Measures: Consistency and Bounds. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 38:132–148

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bellini F (2012) Isotonicity results for generalized quantiles. Statistics and Probability Letters 82:2017–2024

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bellini F, Bignozzi V (2015) On elicitable risk measures. Quant Finan 15:725–733

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bellini F, Klar B, Müller A, Rosazza Gianin E (2014) Generalized quantiles as risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 54:41–48

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi F, Scarlatti S (2012) From Normal vs Skew-Normal Portfolios: FSD and SSD Rules. Journal of Mathematical Finance 2:90–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilers PHC (2013) Discussion: the beauty of expectiles. Stat Model 13:317–322

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq M, Steinwart I (2015) An SVM-like Approach for Expectile Regression. arXiv:1507.03887

  • Giles DE, Feng H, Godwin RT (2013) On the Bias of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator for the Two-Parameter Lomax Distribution. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 42:1934–1950

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MC (1994) Expectiles and M-quantiles are quantiles. Statistics and Probability Letters 20:149–153

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keating C, Shadwick WF (2002) A Universal Performance Measure. The Finance Development Centre, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating C, Shadwick WF (2002) An Introduction to Omega. The Finance Development Centre, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneib T (2013) Beyond mean regression. Stat Model 13:275–303

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R (2013) Discussion: Living beyond our means. Stat Model 13:323–333

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Cabrera B, Schulz F (2014) Forecasting generalized quantiles of electricity demand: A functional data approach. SFB 649 Discussion Paper, No. 2014-030. Humboldt University, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller A (1996) Ordering of risks: A comparative study via stop-loss transforms. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 17:215–222

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Müller A (1997) Stochastic Orders generated by Integrals: A Unified Study. Adv Appl Probab 29:414–428

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Müller A, Stoyan D (2002) Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Newey K, Powell J (1987) Asymmetric least squares estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:819–847

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (2016) National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/

  • Pickands J (1975) Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. Ann Stat 3:119–131

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard B (2013) Statistical Methods for Financial Engineering, Chapman and Hall/CRC

  • Schnabel SK, Eilers PHC (2009) An analysis of life expectancy and economic production using expectile frontier zones. Demogr Res 21:109–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Waltrup L, Sobotka F, Kneib T, Kauermann G (2015) Expectile and quantile regression: David and Goliath?. Stat Model 15:433–456

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shaked M, Shantikumar JG (2007) Stochastic Orders, Springer Series in Statistics

  • Whitmore GA (1970) Third-Degree Stochastic Dominance. American Economic Review 60:457–459

  • Ziegel JF (2016) Coherence and elicitability. Math Financ 26:901–918

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfred Müller.

Additional information

In memory of Moshe Shaked

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bellini, F., Klar, B. & Müller, A. Expectiles, Omega Ratios and Stochastic Ordering. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 20, 855–873 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-016-9527-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-016-9527-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation