Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 381-402

First online:

The phenomenon and the transcendental: Jean-Luc Marion, Marc Richir, and the issue of phenomenalization

  • Florian ForestierAffiliated withCentre d’études de la philosophie classique allemande et de sa postérité (CEPCAP), Université Paris-Sorbonne Email author 

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


After reviewing the status of the concept of the phenomenon in Husserl’s phenomenology and the aim of successive attempts to reform, de-formalize, and to widen it, we show the difficulties of a method that, following the example of Jean-Luc Marion’s phenomenology, intends to connect the phenomenon directly to the revelation of an exteriority. We argue that, on the contrary, Marc Richir’s phenomenology, which strives to grasp the phenomenon as nothing-but-phenomenon, is more likely to capture the “meaning” of the phenomenological, and hence to help us orient in the field of problems that phenomenology encounters without always knowing how to tackle them. Yet, this extension of the phenomenon’s domain does not thereby encompass everything: there may well be certain issues that require a phenomenology without phenomenon; but the meaning of this cannot be determined before the complete reenvisioning of transcendental phenomenology.


Phenomenology Transcendental Meaning Marion Husserl Richir