Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Recent Developments in Closed-Loop Approaches for Real-Time Mining and Petroleum Extraction

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advanced data acquisition and process modelling technology provide ‘real-time’ data and decision support capacity for different aspects of the resource extraction process. Closed-loop approaches have recently been applied to utilize information extracted from these data in combination with advanced computing technology for improved production control in mineral resource extraction. Similar techniques have been developed in the petroleum industry combining computer-assisted model updating with model-based production optimization. This contribution reviews recent developments and methods applied, highlights differences and assesses the potential value addition for both application domains. The focus here is on the two main constituents of closed-loop concepts, data assimilation and optimization. Technological readiness of the constituents is assessed, and gaps for further technology development are identified. The value added is illustrated by means of selected cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aanonsen SI, Naevdal G, Oliver DS, Reynolds AC, Valles B (2009) The ensemble Kalman filter in reservoir engineering: a review. SPE J 14(3):393–412. doi:10.2118/117274-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhuthali AH, Datta-Gupta A, Yuen B, Fontanilla JP (2008) Optimal rate control under geologic uncertainty. Paper SPE 113628 presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. doi:10.2118/113628-MS

  • Alpak FO, van Kats F, Hohl D (2009) Stochastic history matching of a deepwater turbidite reservoir. Paper SPE 119030 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, USA, 2–4 February

  • Awasthi A, Sankaran S, Nikolaou M, Saputelli L, Mijares G (2008) Short-term production optimization by automated adaptive modeling and control. Paper SPE 112239 presented at the Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 25–27 February. doi:10.2118/112239-MS

  • Babaei M, Alkhatib A, Pan I (2015) Robust optimization of subsurface flow using polynomial chaos and response surface surrogates. Comput Geosci 19:979–998. doi:10.1007/s10596-015-9516-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey WJ, Couet B, Wilkinson D (2005) Framework for field optimization to maximize asset value. SPE Reser Evaluation Eng 8(1):7–21. doi:10.2118/87026-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakshi A, Uniacke E, Dias E (2015) Lessons learned from world-wide deployments of model-based real time production optimization solutions. Paper SPE 173452 presented at the SPE Digital Energy Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, USA, 3–5 March

  • Bangerth W, Klie WH, Stoffa PL (2006) On optimization algorithms for the reservoir oil well placement problem. Comput Geosci 10(3):303–319. doi:10.1007/s10596-006-9025-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros EGD, Van den Hof PMJ, Jansen JD (2016) Value of information in closed-loop reservoir management. Comput Geosci 20(3):737–749. doi:10.1007/s10596-015-9509-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batycky RP, Thiele MR, Baker RO, Chugh SH (2008) Revisiting reservoir flood-surveillance methods using streamlines. SPE Reserv Evaluation Eng 11(2):387–394. doi:10.2118/95402-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benndorf J, Dimitrakopoulos R (2007) New efficient methods for conditional simulation of large orebodies. Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mine Planning. AusIMM Spectrum Ser. 2nd Edn. 14:103–110

  • Benndorf J, Dimitrakopoulos R (2013) Stochastic long-term production scheduling of iron ore deposits: Integrating joint multi-element geological uncertainty. J Mining Sci 49(1):68–81. doi:10.1134/S1062739149010097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benndorf J (2015) Making use of online production data: sequential updating of mineral resource models. Math Geosci 47(5):547–563. doi:10.1007/s11004-014-9561-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benndorf J, Yüksel C, Shishvan MS, Rosenberg H, Thielemann T, Mittmann R, Lohsträter OM, Lindig M, Minnecker C, Donner R, Naworyta W (2015) (2015a) RTRO-Coal: real-time resource-reconciliation and optimization for exploitation of coal deposits. Minerals 5:546–569. doi:10.3390/min5030509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benndorf J, Buxton MWN, Nienhaus K, Rattmann L, Korre A, Soares A, deJong A, Jeannee N, Graham P, Buttgereit D, Gehlen C, Eijkelkamp F, Mischo H, Sandtke M, Wilsnack T (2015b) Real-time mining - Moving towards continuous process management in mineral resource extraction. In proceedings of the 3rd international future mining confere, nce. AUSIMM, Sydney, pp 37–46

  • Bieker HP, Slupphaug O, Johansen TA (2007) Real-time production optimization of oil and gas production systems: a technology survey. SPE Prod Operat 22(4):382–391. doi:10.2118/99446-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijmolt MJ (2016) Meeting short-term production targets: controlling short-term deviations from production targets by blending geological confidence classes of reporting standards. MSc Thesis, Delft University of Technology, online available under uuid:5d10d423-fd8e-46d0-b220-793c2fddbf73

  • Bissell RC, Dubrule O, Lamy P, Swaby P, Lepine O (1997) Combining geostatistical modelling with gradient information for history matching: The pilot point method. Paper SPE 38730 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 5–8 October, San Antonio, USA. doi:10.2118/38730-MS

  • Boucher A, Dimitrakopoulos R (2009) Block simulation of multiple correlated variables. Math Geosci 41(2):215–237. doi:10.1007/s11004-008-9178-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzarkouna Z, Ding D, Auger A (2012) Well placement optimization with the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy and meta-models. Comput Geosci 16(1):75–92. doi:10.1007/s10596-011-9254-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer DR, Jansen JD (2004) Dynamic optimization of water flooding with smart wells using optimal control theory. SPE J 9(4):391–402. doi:10.2118/78278-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer DR, Naevdal G, Jansen JD, Vefring E, van Kruijsdijk CPJW (2004) Improved reservoir management through optimal control and continuous model updating. Paper SPE 90149 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, USA, pp 26–29 September

  • Bukshtynov V, Volkov O, Durlofsky LJ, Aziz K (2015) Comprehensive framework for gradient-based optimization in closed-loop reservoir management. Comput Geosci 19(4):877–897. doi:10.1007/s10596-015-9496-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton MWN, Benndorf J (2013) The use of sensor derived data in real time mine optimization: A preliminary overview and assessment of techno-economic significance. In s.n. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2013 SME Annual Meeting. SME, Golden, Colorado, USA, pp 215–219

  • Caers J (2011) Modeling uncertainty in the earth sciences, Wiley

  • Cao Q, Banerjee R, Gupta S, Li J, Zhou W, Jeyachandra B (2016) Data driven production forecasting using machine learning. Paper SPE 180984 presented at the Argentina Exploration and Production of Unconventional Resources Symposium, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1–3 June

  • Capolei A, Suwartadi E, Foss B, Bagterp Jørgensen J (2013) Waterflooding optimization in uncertain geological scenarios. Comput Geosci 17(6):991–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capolei A, Suwartadi E, Foss B, Jorgensen JB (2015) A mean-variance objective for robust production optimization in uncertain geological scenarios. J Petrol Sci Eng 125:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Y, Bouzarkouna Z, Devegowda D (2015) Multi-objective optimization for rapid and robust optimal oilfield development under geological uncertainty. Comput Geosci 19(4):933–950. doi:10.1007/s10596-015-9507-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Oliver DS, Zhang D (2009) Efficient ensemble-based closed-loop production optimization. SPE J 14(4):634–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Oliver DS (2010) Ensemble-based closed-loop optimization applied to Brugge Field. SPE Reserv Eng Evaluation 13(1):56–71. doi:10.2118/118926-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Wang Y, Li G, Reynolds AC (2010) Closed-loop reservoir management on the Brugge test case. Comput Geosci 14(4):691–703. doi:10.1007/s10596-010-9181-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Li G, Reynolds A (2012) Robust constrained optimization of short- and long-term net present value for closed-loop reservoir management. SPE J 17(3):849–864. doi:10.2118/141314-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier C, Emery X, Ginsbourger D (2015) Fast Update of conditional simulation ensembles. Math Geosci 47(7):771–789. doi:10.1007/s11004-014-9573-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung S, Chan FT, Chan H (2009) A modified genetic algorithm approach for scheduling of perfect maintenance in distributed production scheduling. Eng Appl Arti Intell 22(7):1005–1014. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2008.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couët B, Djikpesse H, Tonkin T et al (2010) Production enhancement through integrated asset modeling optimization. Paper SPE 135901 presented at the SPE Production and Operations Conference and Exhibition, Tunis, Tunisia, 8–10 June. doi:10.2118/135901-MS

  • Cullick AS, Johnson WD, Shi G (2006) Improved and more rapid history matching with a nonlinear proxy and global optimization. Paper SPE 101933 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, USA, 24–27 September. doi:10.2118/101933-MS

  • Datta-Gupta A, King MJ (2007) Streamline simulation: theory and practice, SPE textbook series, 11. SPE, Richardson

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MW (1987) Production of conditional simulations via the LU triangular decomposition of the covariance matrix. Math Geol 19(2):91–98. doi:10.1007/BF00898189

  • Deraisme J, Rivoirard J, Carrasco P (2008) Multivariate uniform conditioning and block simulations with discrete Gaussian model: application to Chuquicamata deposit. In: Ortiz JM, Emery X (eds) Proceedings of the Eighth International Geostatistics Congress, pp 69–78

  • Dilib FA, Jackson MD, Zadeh AM, Aasheim R, Årland K, Gyllensten AJ, Erlandsen SM (2015) Closed-loop feedback control in intelligent wells: application to a heterogeneous, thin oil-rim reservoir in the North Sea. SPE Reserv Evaluation Eng 18(1):69–83. doi:10.2118/159550-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos R, Farrelly C, Godoy MC (2002) Moving forward from traditional optimisation: grade uncertainty and risk effects in open pit mine design. Trans IMM A Mining Industry 111(1):82–88. doi:10.1179/mnt.2002.111.1.82

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos R (2011) Stochastic optimization for strategic mine planning: a decade of developments. J Mining Sci 47(2):138–150. doi:10.1134/S1062739147020018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014) Technology readiness levels (TRL), Horizon 2020 – Work Programme 2014–2015, General Annexes, Extract from Part 19—Commission Decision C(2014)4995. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/annexes/h2020-wp1415-annex-g-trl_en.pdf

  • Echeverrıa Ciaurri D, Isebor OJ, Durlofsky LJ (2011) Application of derivative-free methodologies to generally constrained oil production optimization problems. Int J Math Model Num Optim 2(2):134–161. doi:10.1504/IJMMNO.2011.039425

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerick AA, Reynolds AC (2013) History-matching production and seismic data in a real field case using the ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation. Paper SPE163645 presented at the Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, Texas, USA 18–20 February. doi:10.2118/163645-MS

  • Evensen G (2003) The Ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical information. Ocean Dyn 53(4):343–367. doi:10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evensen G (2009) Data assimilation: the ensemble Kalman filter, 2nd edn., Springer, Berlin

  • Fonseca RM, Leeuwenburgh O, Della Rossa E, Van den Hof PMJ, Jansen JD (2015) Ensemble-based multi-objective optimization of on-off control devices under geological uncertainty. SPE Reserv Evaluation Eng 18(4):1094–6470. doi:10.2118/173268-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca RM, Chen B, Jansen JD, Reynolds AC (2016) A stochastic simplex approximate gradient (StoSAG) for optimization under uncertainty. Int J Num Methods Eng. doi:10.1002/nme.5342 (Published online)

  • Forouzanfar F, Della Rossa E, Russo R, Reynolds AC (2013) Life-cycle production optimization of an oil field with an adjoint-based gradient approach. J Petrol Sci Eng 112:351–358. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2013.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forouzanfar F, Reynolds AC, Li G (2012) Optimization of the well locations and completions for vertical and horizontal wells using a derivative-free optimization algorithm. J Petrol Sci Eng 86–87:272–288. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forouzanfar F, Reynolds AC (2014) Joint optimization of number of wells, well locations and controls using a gradient-based algorithm. Chem Eng Res Design 92(7):1315–1328. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2013.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forouzanfar F, Poquioma WE, Reynolds AC (2016) Simultaneous and sequential estimation of optimal placement and controls of wells with a covariance matrix adaptation algorithm. SPE J 21(2):501–521. doi:10.2118/173256-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss B, Jensen JP (2010) Performance analysis for closed-loop reservoir management. SPE J 16(1):183–190. doi:10.2118/138891-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gansterer M, Almeder C, Hartl RF (2014) Simulation-based optimization methods for setting production planning parameters. Int J Prod Econ 151:206–213. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavalas GR, Shah PC, Seinfeld JH (1976) Reservoir history matching by Bayesian estimation. SPE J 16(6):337–350. doi:10.2118/5740-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilani SO, Sattarvand J (2016) Integrating geological uncertainty in long-term open pit mine production planning by ant colony optimization. Comp Geosci 87:31–40. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2015.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy M, Dimitrakopoulos R (2004) Managing risk and waste mining in long-term production scheduling of open-pit mines. Transactions of Society for mining, metallurgy and exploration, Golden, Co, paper 316

  • Glegola MA, Ditmar P, Hanea R, Eiken O, Vossepoel FC, Arts R, Klees R (2012) History matching time-lapse surface-gravity and well-pressure data with ensemble smoother for estimating gasfield aquifer support-A 3D numerical study. SPE J 17(4):966–980. doi:10.2118/161483-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow R, Dimitrakopoulos R (2013) Algorithmic integration of geological uncertainty in pushback designs for complex multi-process open pit mines. IMM Trans Mining Technol 122(2):67–77. doi:10.1179/147490013X13639459465736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostat Nat Resour Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, Applied Geostatistics Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosavi A (2014) Simulation-based optimization: parametric optimization techniques and reinforcement learning, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Güyagüler B, Horne RN, Rogers L, Rosenzweig JJ (2002) Optimization of well placement in a gulf of Mexico waterflooding project. SPE Reserv Evaluation Eng 5(3):229–236. doi:10.2118/78266-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hachicha W, Ammeri A, Masmoudi F, Chachoub H (2010) A comprehensive literature classification of simulation optimization methods. MOPGP’10 - May 24–26, 2010—Sousse—Tunisia, MPRA Paper No. 27652

  • Hadavand M, Deutsch CV (2016) A practical methodology for integration of 4D seismic in steam-assisted-gravity-drainage reservoir characterization. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering. doi:10.2118/184390-PA (Published online)

  • Hall BE (2000) Simulation Modelling of Mining Systems. Proceedings Massmin 2000. Melbourne: The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne

  • Hanea R, Evensen G, Hustoft L, Ek T, Chitu A, Wilschut F (2015) Reservoir management under geological uncertainty using fast model update. Paper SPE 173305 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, USA, 23–25 February. doi:10.2118/173305-MS

  • Hou J, Zhou K, Zhang XS, Kang XD, Xie H (2015) A review of closed-loop reservoir management. Petrol Sci 12:114–128. doi:10.1007/s12182-014-0005-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries TD, Haynes RD (2015) Joint optimization of well placement and control for nonconventional well types. J Petrol Sci Eng 126:242–253. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2014.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isebor OJ, Echeverría Ciaurri D, Durlofsky LJ (2014a) Generalized field-development optimization with derivative-free procedures. SPE J 19(5).doi:10.2118/163631-PA

  • Isebor OJ, Durlofsky LJ, Echeverría Ciaurri D (2014b) A derivative-free methodology with local and global search for the constrained joint optimization of well locations and controls. Comput Geosci 18(3):463–482. doi:10.1007/s10596-013-9383-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarpour B, McLaughlin D (2009) Efficient permeability parameterization with the discrete cosine transform. SPE J 14(1):182–201. doi:10.2118/106453-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarpour B, Goyal VK, McLaughlin DB, Freeman WT (2010) Compressed history matching: Exploiting transform-domain sparsity for regularization of nonlinear dynamic data integration problems. Math Geosci 42(1):1–27. doi:10.1007/s11004-009-9247-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JD (2011) Adjoint-based optimization of multiphase flow through porous media - a review. Comp Fluids 46(1):40–51. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.09.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JD, Wagenvoort AM, Droppert VS, Daling R, Glandt CA (2002) Smart well solutions for thin oil rims: Inflow switching and the smart stinger completion. Paper SPE 77942 presented at the Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Melbourne, Australia, 8–10 October. doi:10.2118/77942-MS

  • Jansen JD, Brouwer DR, Naevdal G, van Kruijsdijk CPJW (2005) Closed-loop reservoir management. First Break 23:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JD, Bosgra OH, Van den Hof PMJ (2008) Model-based control of multiphase flow in subsurface oil reservoirs. J Process Control 18:846–855. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JD, Douma SG, Brouwer DR, Van den Hof PMJ, Bosgra OH, Heemink AW (2009) Closed-loop reservoir management. Paper SPE 119098 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, USA, 2–4 February

  • Jesmani M, Bellout MC, Hanea R, Foss B (2016) Well placement optimization subject to realistic field development constraints. Comput Geosci. doi:10.1007/s10596-016-9584-1 (Published online)

  • Jewbali A, Dimitrakopouos R (2011) Implementation of conditional simulation of successive residuals. Comput Geosc 37(1):129–142. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin L, van den Hoek PJ, Alpak FO, Pirmez C, Fehintola T, Tendo F, Olaniyan EE (2012) A comparison of stochastic data-integration algorithms for the joint history matching of production and time-lapse-seismic data. SPE Journal 15(4):498–512. doi:10.2118/146418-PA

    Google Scholar 

  • John A (2014) Extension and application of geostatistical simulation approaches for uncertainty based modelling of complex sedimentary deposits. PhD thesis., TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Faculty of Geociences, Geotechnics and Mining. http://www.qucosa.de/recherche/frontdoor/?tx_slubopus4frontend[id]=urn:nbn:de:bsz:105-qucosa-157640

  • Journel AG (1974) Geostatistics for conditional simulation of ore bodies. Econ Geol 69(5):673–687. doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.69.5.673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupp K, Howard TJ, Everett JE (2013) The role of precrusher stockpiling for grade control in mining, in Proceedings Iron Ore 2013. Melbourne, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp 203–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Basic Eng 82(1):35–45. doi:10.1115/1.3662552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katterbauer K, Hoteit I, Sun S (2016) Synergizing crosswell seismic and electromagnetic techniques for enhancing reservoir characterization. SPE J 21(3):909–927. doi:10.2118/174559-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourounis D, Durlofsky LJ, Jansen JD, Aziz K (2014) Adjoint formulation and constraint handling for gradient-based optimization of compositional reservoir flow. Comput Geosci 18(2):117–137. doi:10.1007/s10596-013-9385-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumral M, Dowd PA (2005) A simulated annealing approach to mine production scheduling. J Operat Res Soc 56(8):922–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamghari A, Dimitrakopoulos R (2012) A diversified Tabu search approach for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem with metal uncertainty. Euro J Operat Res 222(3):642–652. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa D, Valery W, Wortley M, Ozkocak T, Pike M (2007) The use of the radio frequency ID tags to track ore in mining operations. In; Magri EJ (ed) Proceedings APCOM. Gecamin Ltda, Santiago, pp 601–610

  • Le DH, Emerick AE, Reynolds AC (2016) An adaptive ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation for assisted history matching. SPE J. doi:10.2118/173214-PA (Published online)

  • Li R, Reynolds AC, Oliver DS (2003) History matching of three-phase flow production data. SPE J 8(4):328–340. doi:10.2118/87336-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Jafarpour B, Mahammad-Khaninezhad M (2013) A simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation algorithm for coupled well placement and control optimization under geologic uncertainty. Comput Geosci 17(1):167–188. doi:10.1007/s10596-012-9323-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui X, Reynolds AC (2016) Multi-objective optimization for rapid and robust optimal oilfield development under geological uncertainty. Comput Geosci 20:677–693. doi:10.1007/s10596-015-9523-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JT, Chen CM (2015) Simulation optimization approach for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem in semiconductor back-end manufacturing. Simul Model Pract Theory 51:100–114. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2014.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litvak ML, Angert PF (2009) Field development optimization applied to giant oil fields. Paper SPE 118840 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, USA, 2-4 February. doi:10.2118/118840-MS

  • Mankins JC (1995) Technology Readiness Levels: A White Paper. NASA, Office of Space Access and Technology, Advanced Concepts Office. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/trl/trl.pdf

  • Marcotte D (1994) Direct conditional simulation of block grades. In: Dimitrakopoulos R (ed) Geostatistics for the Next Century. Kluwer, pp 245–252

  • Mariethoz G, Caers J (2014) Multiple-point Geostatistics: Stochastic Modeling with Training Images. Wiley

  • Menabde M, Froyland G, Stone P, Yeates G (2007) Mining schedule optimization for conditionally simulated orebodies. In: Dimitrakopoulos R (ed) Orebody modelling and strategic mine planning. Spectrum Series 14, 2nd edn, 379–384, Carlton, Vic., AusIMM

  • Mohamed L, Christie M, Demyanov V (2010) Comparison of stochastic sampling algorithms for uncertainty quantification. SPE J 15(1):31–38. doi:10.2118/119139-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollema DJ (2015) Investigation into simulation based optimization of a continuous mining operation. MSc-Thesis at the Section of Resource Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. http://www.repository.tudelft.nl

  • Naevdal G, Brouwer DR, Jansen JD (2006) Water flooding using closed-loop control. Comput Geosci 10(1):37–60. doi:10.1007/s10596-005-9010-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman AM, Rubio E, Caro R, Weintraub A, Eurek K (2010) A review of operations research in mine planning. Interfaces 40(3):222–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver DS, Reynolds AC, Liu N (2008) Inverse theory for petroleum reservoir characterization and history matching. Cambridge University Press

  • Oliver DS, Chen Y (2011) Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review. Comput Geosci 15(1):185–221. doi:10.1007/s10596-010-9194-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omre H, Lødøen OP (2004) Improved production forecasts and history matching using approximate fluid-flow simulators. SPE J 9(3):339–351. doi:10.2118/74691-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owunalu JE, Durlofsky L (2010) Application of a particle swarm optimization algorithm for determining optimum well location and type. Comput Geosci 14(1):183–198. doi:10.1007/s10596-009-9142-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owunalu JE, Durlofsky L (2011) A new well-pattern-optimization procedure for large-scale field development. SPE J 16(3):594–607. doi:10.2118/124364-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajonk O, Schulze-Riegert R, Krosche M, Hassan M, Nwakile MM (2011) Ensemble-based water flooding optimization applied to mature fields. Paper SPE-142621-MS presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, 25–28 September

  • Parker HM (2012) Reconciliation principles for the mining industry. Mining Technol 121(3):160–176. doi:10.1179/1743286312Y.0000000007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel K, Aske AM, Fredriksen M (2014) Use of model-predictive control for automating SAGD well-pair operations: A simulation study. SPE Prod Operat 29(2):105–113. doi:10.2118/165535-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters L, Arts RJ, Brouwer GK, Geel CR, Cullick S, Lorentzen RJ, Chen Y, Dunlop KNB, Vossepoel FC, Xu R, Sarma P, Alhuthali AH, Reynolds AC (2010) Results of the Brugge benchmark study for flooding optimization and history matching. SPE Reserv Evaluation Eng 13(3):391–405. doi:10.2118/119094-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyrcz MJ, Deutsch CV (2014) Geostatistical modeling 2nd edn, Oxford University Press

  • Remi N, Boucher A, Wu J (2009) Appl Geostat SGeMS. Cambridge University Press

  • Rondon O (2012) Teaching aid: Minimum/maximum autocorrelation factors for joint simulation of attributes. Math Geosci 44(4):469–504. doi:10.1007/s11004-011-9329-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagatun SI (2010) Boundary control of a horizontal oil reservoir. SPE J 15(4):1020–1027. doi:10.2118/135534-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahni I, Horne RN (2005) Multiresolution wavelet analysis for improved reservoir description. SPE Reserv Evaluation Eng 8(1):53–69. doi:10.2118/87820-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saputelli L, Nikolaou M, Economides MJ (2006) Real-time reservoir management: a multi-scale adaptive optimization and control approach. Comput Geosci 10(1):61–96. doi:10.1007/s10596-005-9011-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma P, Durlofsky LJ, Aziz K, Chen WH (2007) A new approach to automatic history matching using kernel PCA. Paper 106176 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA, 26–28 February. doi:10.2118/106176-MS

  • Sarma P, Durlofsky LJ, Aziz K, Chen WH (2006) Efficient real-time reservoir management using adjoint-based optimal control and model updating. Comput Geosci 10(1):3–36. doi:10.1007/s10596-005-9009-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma P, Chen WH (2008) Efficient well placement optimization with gradient-based algorithms and adjoint models. Paper SPE 112257 presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 25–27 February. doi:10.2118/112257-MS

  • Sarma P, Durlofsky LJ, Aziz K (2008a) Computational techniques for closed-loop reservoir modeling with application to a realistic reservoir. Petrol Sci Technol 26(10 & 11):1120–1140. doi:10.1080/10916460701829580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma P, Chen WH, Durlofsky LJ, Aziz K (2008b) Production optimization with adjoint models under nonlinear control-state path inequality constraints. SPE Reserv Evaluation Eng 11(2):326–339. doi:10.2118/99959-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayarpour M, Kabir CS, Lake LW (2009) Field applications of capacitance resistive models in waterfloods. SPE Reserv Evaluation Eng 12(6):853–864. doi:10.2118/114983-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Riegert RW, Axmann JK, Haase O, Rian DT, You Y-L (2002) Evolutionary algorithms applied to history matching of complex reservoirs. SPE Reserv Evaluation Eng 5(2):163–173. doi:10.2118/77301-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiler A, Aanonsen SI, Evensen G, Rivenæs JC (2010) Structural surface uncertainty modeling and updating using the ensemble Kalman filter. SPE J 15(4):1062–1076. doi:10.2118/125352-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart WA(1931) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. ASQ Quality Press

  • Shirangi M, Durlofsky LJ (2015) Closed-loop field development under uncertainty by use of optimization with sample validation. SPE J 20(5):908–922. doi:10.2118/173219-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shishvan MS, Benndorf J (2016) The effect of geological uncertainty on achieving short-term targets: A quantitative approach using stochastic process simulation. J Southern African Instit Mining Metal 116(3):259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siraj MM, Van den Hof PMJ, Jansen JD (2015) Model and economic uncertainties in balancing short-term and long-term objectives in water flooding optimization. Paper 173285-MS presented at the 2015 SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, USA, 22–25 February. doi:10.2118/173285-MS

  • Skjervheim JA, Evensen G, Aanonsen SI, Ruud BO, Johansen TA (2007) Incorporating 4D seismic data in reservoir simulation models using ensemble Kalman filter. SPE J 12(3):282–292. doi:10.2118/95789-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares A (2001) Direct sequential simulation and cosimulation. Math Geol 33(8):911–926. doi:10.1023/A:1012246006212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebelle S, Journel A (2001) Reservoir modeling using multiple-point statistics. Paper SPE 71324 presented at the 2001 Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, USA

  • Sudaryanto B, Yortsos YC (2000) Optimization of fluid front dynamics in porous media using rate control. Phys Fluids 12(7):1656–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarantola A (2005) Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli R, Reynolds AC (2010) History matching with parameterization based on the SVD of a dimensionless sensitivity matrix. SPE J 15(2):495–508. doi:10.2118/118952-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trani M, Arts R, Leeuwenburgh O (2012) Seismic history matching of fluid fronts using the ensemble Kalman filter. SPE J 18(1):159–171. doi:10.2118/163043-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doren JFM, Van den Hof PMJ, Bosgra OH, Jansen JD (2013) Controllability and observability in two-phase porous media flow. Comput Geosci 17(5):773–788. doi:10.1007/s10596-013-9355-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Essen GM, Zandvliet MJ, Van den Hof PMJ, Bosgra OH, Jansen JD (2009) Robust waterflooding optimization of multiple geological scenarios. SPE J 14(1):202–210. doi:10.2118/102913-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Essen GM, Jansen JD, Brouwer DR, Douma SG, Zandvliet MJ, Rollett KI, Harris DP (2010) Optimization of smart wells in the St. Joseph field. SPE Reserv Evaluation Eng 13(4):588–595. doi:10.2118/123563-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Essen GM, Van den Hof PMJ, Jansen JD (2011) Hierarchical long-term and short-term production optimization. SPE J 16(1):191–199. doi:10.2118/124332-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Essen GM, Van den Hof PMJ, Jansen JD (2013) A two-level strategy to realize life-cycle production optimization in an operational setting. SPE J 18(6):1057–1066. doi:10.2118/149736-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vann J, Jackson S, Bye A, Coward S, Moayer S, Nicholas G, Wolff RC (2012) Scenario thinking: a powerful tool for strategic planning and evaluation of mining projects and operations. In: Project Evaluation 2012: Proceedings. Project Evaluation Conference 2012, Melbourne, Australia, (5–14). 24–26 May 2012

  • Vargas-Guzman JA, Dimitrakopoulos R (2002) Conditional simulation of random fields by successive residuals. Math Geol 34(1):597–611. doi:10.1023/A:1016099029432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verly GW (1993) Sequential Gaussian cosimulation; a simulation method integrating several types of information. In: Soares A (ed) Geostatistics, vol 2. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 543–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Vielma, J.P., Espinoza D, Moreno E (2009) Risk control in ultimate pits using conditional simulations. Proceedings of the 34th International Symposium on Application of Computers and Operations Research in The Mineral Industry (APCOM 2009), pp 107–114

  • Vlemmix S, Joosten GJP, Brouwer DR, Jansen JD (2009) Adjoint-based well trajectory optimization in a thin oil rim. Paper SPE 121891 presented at the SPE European Petroleum Conference / EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8–11 June

  • Wambeke T, Benndorf J (2015) Data assimilation of sensor measurements to improve production forecast in resource extraction. In: Schaeben H, Tolosana Delgado R, van den Boogaart KG, van den Boogaart R (eds) Proceedings of the 17th annual conference of the international association for mathematical geosciences, IAMG2015. IAMG, Houston, pp 236–245

  • Wang C, Li G, Reynolds AC (2007) Optimal well placement for production optimization. Paper SPE 111154 presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Lexington, USA, 11-14 October. doi:10.2118/111154-MS

  • Wang C, Li G, Reynolds AC (2009) Production optimization in closed-loop reservoir management. SPE J 14(3):506–523. doi:10.2118/109805-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu T, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2015) Inverse sequential simulation: A new approach for the characterization of hydraulic conductivities demonstrated on a non-Gaussian field. Water Resour Res 51(4):2227–2242. doi:10.1002/2014WR016320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Nghiem L, Card C, Bremeir M (2007) Reservoir model uncertainty quantification through computer-assisted history matching. Paper SPE 109825 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, USA, 11-14 November. doi:10.2118/109825-MS

  • Yasari E, Pishvaie MR, Khorasheh F, Salahshoor K, Kharrat R (2013) Application of multi-criterion robust optimization in water-flooding of oil reservoir. J Petrol Sci Eng 109:1–11. doi:10.1016/J.PETROL.2013.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeten B, Durlofsky LJ, Aziz K (2003) Optimization of nonconventional well type, location and trajectory. SPE J 8(3):200–210. doi:10.2118/86880-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yüksel C, Thielemann T, Wambeke T, Benndorf J (2016) Real-time resource Model updating for improved coal quality control using online data. Int J Coal Geol. Available online. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2016.05.014

  • Zandvliet MJ, Handels M, Van Essen GM, Brouwer DR, Jansen JD (2008a) Adjoint-based well placement optimization under production constraints. SPE J 13(4):392–399. doi:10.2118/105797-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zandvliet MJ, van Doren JFM, Bosgra OH, Jansen JD, van den Hof PMJ (2008b) Controllability, observability and identifiability in single-phase porous media flow. Comput Geosci 12(4):605–622. doi:10.1007/s10596-008-9100-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Kang Z, Zhang X, Sun H, Cao L, Reynolds AC (2016) A physics-based data-driven numerical model for reservoir history matching and prediction with a field application SPE J. doi:10.2118/173213-PA (Published online)

  • Zogovic N, Dimitrijevic S, Pantelic S, Stosic D (2015) A framework for ICT support to sustainable mining: an integral approach. Conference: ICIST 2015 5th International Conference on Information Society and Technology, At Kopaonik, Serbia, pp73-78, doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.2092.2723

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Geoscience, Geotechnology and Mining, University of Technology Bergakademie Freiberg, Fuchsmühlenweg 9, 09599, Freiberg, Germany

    Jörg Benndorf

  2. Department of Geosciences and Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN, Delft, The Netherlands

    Jan Dirk Jansen

  3. P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA, Delft, The Netherlands

    Jan Dirk Jansen

Authors
  1. Jörg Benndorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Dirk Jansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Benndorf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benndorf, J., Jansen, J.D. Recent Developments in Closed-Loop Approaches for Real-Time Mining and Petroleum Extraction. Math Geosci 49, 277–306 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-016-9664-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-016-9664-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation