Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simultaneous Solving of Three-Dimensional Gravity Anomalies Caused by Pumping Tests in Unconfined Aquifers

  • Application
  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contribution of geophysical techniques to groundwater characterization has largely evolved during the last two decades. As gravity is a geophysical technique sensitive to underground mass variations and due to the improved resolution of modern gravity meters, it can provide information on changes in the phreatic level caused by water being pumped from unconfined aquifers. Previous studies simulated the hydraulic head and the gravimetric anomaly using independent codes. The mass change associated to the pumping well-simulated drawdown had to be externally transferred to the gravity code used to simulate the gravimetrical anomaly, which has severe drawbacks. This article describes how to solve the forward coupled hydro-gravity problem using a unique finite-element code. To illustrate it, it is shown the case of a two-dimensional hydraulic model coupled to its three-dimensional gravity anomaly and also a more complex case where both related domains are three-dimensional. Both are compared against analytical solutions and discussed. The methodology is very flexible, general and amenable to extensions like including heterogeneous domains or coupling with the inverse problem in the same loop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow PM, Moench AF (1999) WTAQ—a computer program for calculating drawdowns and estimating hydraulic properties for confined and water-table aquifers, report 99–4225, US Department of the Interior. US Geol Surv, p 84

  • Binley A, Cassian G, Deiana R (2010) Hydrogeophysics: opportunities and challenges. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 51(December):267–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Blainey JB, Ferré TPA, Cordova JT (2007) Assessing the likely value of gravity and drawdown measurements to constrain estimates of hydraulic conductivity and specific yield during unconfined aquifer testing. Water Resour Res 43(12):W12408. doi:10.1029/2006WR005678

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler SL, Sinha G (2012) Forward modeling of applied geophysics methods using Comsol and comparison with analytical and laboratory analog models. Comput Geosci 42:168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen L, Lund S, Andersen OB, Binning PJ, Rosbjerg D, Bauer-Gottwein P (2011) Measuring gravity change caused by water storage variations: performance assessment under controlled conditions. J Hydrol 402(1–2):60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COMSOL (2013) COMSOL multiphysics user’s guide, p 1356

  • Creutzfeldt B, Güntner A, Klugel T, Wziontek H (2008) Simulating the influence of water storage changes on the superconducting gravimeter of the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell, Germany. Geophysics 73(7):WA95–WA104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creutzfeldt B, Güntner A, Thoss H, Merz B, Wziontek H (2010) Measuring the effect of local water storage changes on in situ gravity observations: case study of the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell, Germany. Water Resour Res 46:W08531. doi:10.1029/2009WR008359

    Google Scholar 

  • Damiata BN, Lee TC (2006) Simulated gravitational response to hydraulic testing of unconfined aquifers. J Hydrol 318(1–4):348–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuit J (1863) Etudes théoriques et pratiques sur les movement de eaux dans les cannaux decouverts et a travers les terrains perméables, 2nd edn. Dunod, Paris 304 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiken O, Stenvold T, Zumberge M, Alnes H, Sasagawa G (2008) Gravimetric monitoring of gas production from de Troll field. Geophysics 73(7):WA149–WA154. doi:10.1190/1.2978166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferré T, Bentley L, Binley A, Linde N, Kemna A, Singha K, Holliger K, Huisman JA, Minsley B (2009) Critical steps for the continuing advancement of hydrogeophysics. Eos Trans AGU 90(23):200–202. doi:10.1029/2009EO230004

  • Gasperikova E, Hoversten GM (2008) Gravity monitoring of CO\(_{2}\) movement during sequestration: model studies. Geophysics 73(7):WA105–WA112. doi: 10.1190/1.2985823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehman CL, Harry DL, Sanford WE, Stednick JD, Beckman NA (2009) Estimating specific yield and storage change in an unconfined aquifer using temporal gravity surveys. Water Resour Res 45:W00D21. doi:10.1029/2007WR006096

    Google Scholar 

  • Herckenrath D, Auken E, Christiansen L, Behroozmand AA, Bauer-Gottwein P (2012) Coupled Hydrogeophysical inversion using time-lapse magnetic resonance sounding and time-lapse gravity data for hydraulic aquifer testing: Will it work in practice? Water Resour Res 48:W01539. doi:10.1029/2011WR010411

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinnell AC, Ferré TPA, Vrugt JA, Huisman JA, Moysey S, Rings J, Kowalsky MB (2010) Improved extraction of hydrologic information from geophysical data through coupled hydrogeophysical inversion. Water Resour Res 46:W00D40. doi:10.1029/2008WR007060

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt TM (1970) Gravity changes at Wairakei geothermal field, New Zealand. Geol Soc Am Bull 81:529–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob T, Chery J, Bayer R, Le Moigne N, Boy JP, Vernant P, Boudin F (2009) Time-lapse surface to depth gravity measurements on a karst system reveal the dominant role of the epikarst as a water storage entity. Geophys J Int 177(2):347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob T, Bayer R, Chery J, Le Moigne N (2010) Time-lapse microgravity surveys reveal water storage heterogeneity of a karst aquifer. J Geophys Res 115:B06402. doi:10.1029/2009JB006616

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin Y, Holzbecher E, Sauter M (2014) A novel modeling approach using arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) method for the flow simulation in unconfined aquifers. Comput Geosci 62:88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krešić N (2007) Hydrogeology and groundwater modeling, 2nd edn. CRC Press, London, p 806

    Google Scholar 

  • Leirião S, He X, Christiansen L, Andersen OB, Bauer-Gottwein P (2009) Calculation of the temporal gravity variation from spatially variable water storage change in soils and aquifers. J Hydrol 365(3–4):302–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limited Scintrex (2009) Scintrex Autograv system operation manual. Ontario, p 304

  • Montgomery EL (1971) Determination of coefficient of storage by use of gravity measurements. Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona, p 144

  • Naujoks M, Weise A, Kroner C, Jahr T (2008) Detection of small hydrological variations in gravity by repeated observations with relative gravimeters. J Geodyn 82:543–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naujoks M, Kroner C, Weise W, Jahr T, Krause P, Eisner S (2010) Evaluating local hydrological modelling by temporal gravity observations and a gravimetric three-dimensional model. Geophys J Int 182:233–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman SP (1972) Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resour Res 8(4):1031–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J, Boucher M, Hinderer J, Favreau G, Boy JP, De Linage C, Cappelaere B, Luck B, Oi M, Le Moigne N (2011) Local and global hydrological contributions to time-variable gravity in Southwest Niger. Geophys J Int 184(2):661–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poeter EP (1990) A new tool: delineation of textural heterogeneities in unconfined aquifers, using microgravity surveys during pumping. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 27:315–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Pool DR, Schmidt W (1997) Measurement of groundwater storage change and specific yield using temporal gravity method near Rillito Creek, Tucson, Arizona. US Geol Surv Water Resour Investig Rep 97–4125

  • Pool DR, Eychaner JH (1995) Measurements of aquifer-storage change and specific yield using gravity surveys. Ground Water 33(3):425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapley B, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31(10):L09607. doi:10.1029/2004GL019920

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE (1990) Appl Geophys. Cambridge University Press, New York, 792 p

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by the government of the Principality of Asturias through the PCTI Asturias 2006–2009 and by the FEDER Operative Program 2007–2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hydro-Geophysics and NDT Modelling Unit, Polytechnic School of Mieres, University of Oviedo, C/Gonzalo Gutiérrez Quirós S/N, 33600 , Mieres, Spain

    Andrés González-Quirós

  2. Department of Mining Exploitation and Prospecting, Polytechnic School of Mieres, University of Oviedo, C/Gonzalo Gutiérrez Quirós S/N, 33600 , Mieres, Spain

    José Paulino Fernández-Álvarez

Authors
  1. Andrés González-Quirós
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José Paulino Fernández-Álvarez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés González-Quirós.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

González-Quirós, A., Fernández-Álvarez, J.P. Simultaneous Solving of Three-Dimensional Gravity Anomalies Caused by Pumping Tests in Unconfined Aquifers. Math Geosci 46, 649–664 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-014-9539-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-014-9539-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation