Skip to main content
Log in

A Numerical Framework for Modeling Folds in Structural Geology

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A numerical framework for modeling folds in structural geology is presented. This framework is based on a novel and recently published Hamilton–Jacobi formulation by which a continuum of layer boundaries of a fold is modeled as a propagating front. All the fold classes from the classical literature (parallel folds, similar folds, and other fold types with convergent and divergent dip isogons) are modeled in two and three dimensions as continua defined on a finite difference grid. The propagating front describing the fold geometry is governed by a static Hamilton–Jacobi equation, which is discretized by upwind finite differences and a dynamic stencil construction. This forms the basis of numerical solution by finite difference solvers such as fast marching and fast sweeping methods. A new robust and accurate scheme for initialization of finite difference solvers for the static Hamilton–Jacobi equation is also derived. The framework has been integrated in simulation software, and a numerical example is presented based on seismic data collected from the Karama Block in the North Makassar Strait outside Sulawesi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Algorithm 1
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Algorithm 2
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burridge R, de Hoop MV, Miller D, Spencer C (1998) Multiparameter inversion in anisotropic media. Geophys J Int 134(3):757–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall MG, Lions PL (1983) Viscosity solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi equations. Trans Am Math Soc 277(1):1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall MG, Evans LC, Lions PL (1984) Some properties of viscosity solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi equations. Trans Am Math Soc 282(2):487–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farin G (2002) Curves and surfaces for CAGD: a practical guide, 5th edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillberg T (2011) A semi-ordered fast iterative method (SOFI) for monotone front propagation in simulations of geological folding. In: Chan F, Marinova D, Anderssen B (eds) MODSIM2011: 19th international congress on modelling and simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, pp 631–647

  • Harlow F, Welch J (1965) Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surface. Phys Fluids 8(12):2182–2189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjelle Ø, Petersen SA (2011) A Hamilton–Jacobi framework for modeling folds in structural geology. Math Geosci 43(7):741–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong WK, Fletcher PT, Tao R, Whitaker R (2007) Interactive visualization of volumetric white matter connectivity in DT-MRI using a parallel-hardware Hamilton–Jacobi solver. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 13(6):1480–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao CY, Osher S, Tsai YH (2005) Fast sweeping methods for static Hamilton–Jacobi equations. SIAM J Numer Anal 42(6):2612–2632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser E (1953) Ray theory for moving fluids. J Acoust Soc Am 25(5):945–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeVeque RJ (1992) Numerical methods for conservation laws. Lectures in mathematics ETH Zürich. Birkhäuser, Basel

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Q (2003) Enhancement, extraction, and visualization of 3d volume data. PhD thesis, Linköping University

  • Nishida T, Sugihara K, Kimura M (2007) Stable marker-particle method for the Voronoi diagram in a flow field. J Comput Appl Math 202(2):377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen SA, Hjelle Ø(2008) Earth recursion, an important component in sheared earth model builders. In: EAGE 70th conference & exhibition. Extended abstracts

  • Petersen SA, Hjelle Ø, Jensen SL (2007) Earth modelling using distance fields derived by fast marching. In: EAGE 69th conference & exhibition. Extended abstracts

  • Petersen SA, Hjelle Ø, Hustoft S, Haubiers M, Rasmussen R (2012) Process based data-restoration and model-reconstruction workflow for seismic interpretation and model building. In: EAGE 74th conference & exhibition. Extended Abstracts

  • Pons JP, Boissonnat JD (2007) A Lagrangian approach to dynamic interfaces through kinetic triangulation of the ambient space. Comput Graph Forum 26(2):227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian J, Zhang YT, Zhao HK (2007) A fast sweeping method for static convex Hamilton–Jacobi equations. J Sci Comput 31(1/2):237–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay JG (1967) Folding and fracturing of rocks. McGraw-Hill, New York and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgewick R, Wayne K (2010) Algorithms, 4th edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethian JA (1985) Curvature and the evolution of fronts. Commun Math Phys 101:487–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethian JA (1996) A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:1591–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethian JA (1999) Level set methods and fast marching methods: evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision, and materials science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethian JA, Vladimirsky A (2003) Ordered upwind methods for static Hamilton–Jacobi equations: theory and algorithms. SIAM J Numer Anal 41(1):325–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth DL (1985) On ray tracing parametric surfaces. In: SIGGRAPH, pp 171–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Vladimirsky A (2001) Fast methods for static Hamilton–Jacobi partial differential equations. PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley

  • Zhao H (2005) A fast sweeping method for eikonal equations. Math Comput 74(250):603–627

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank TGS for their permission to let us use the seismic profile from Sulawesi in the numerical example section. We thank Hans Petter Langtangen and Tor Gillberg for helpful discussions, and we also thank the reviewers for useful comments and suggestions that have significantly improved the paper. This work was financed by Statoil ASA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Øyvind Hjelle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hjelle, Ø., Petersen, S.A. & Bruaset, A.M. A Numerical Framework for Modeling Folds in Structural Geology. Math Geosci 45, 255–276 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-013-9452-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-013-9452-7

Keywords

Navigation