Mathematical Geosciences

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 87–101

Interpretation of Na–Cl–Br Systematics in Sedimentary Basin Brines: Comparison of Concentration, Element Ratio, and Isometric Log-ratio Approaches


DOI: 10.1007/s11004-012-9436-z

Cite this article as:
Engle, M.A. & Rowan, E.L. Math Geosci (2013) 45: 87. doi:10.1007/s11004-012-9436-z


Mathematicians and geochemists have long realized that compositional data intrinsically exhibit a structure prone to spurious and induced correlations. This paper demonstrates, using the Na–Cl–Br system, that these mathematical problems are exacerbated in the study of sedimentary basin brines by such processes as the evaporation or dissolution of salts owing to their high salinities. Using two published datasets of Na–Cl–Br data for fluids from the Appalachian Basin, it is shown that log concentration and Na/Br versus Cl/Br methods for displaying solute chemistry may lead to misinterpretation of mixing trends between meteoric waters (for example shallow drinking water aquifers) and basinal brines, partially due to spurious mathematical relationships. An alternative approach, based on the isometric log-ratio transformation of molar concentration data, is developed and presented as an alternative method, free from potential numerical problems of the traditional methods. The utility, intuitiveness, and potential for mathematical problems of the three methods are compared and contrasted. Because the Na–Cl–Br system is a useful tool for sourcing solutes and investigating the evolution of basinal brines, results from this research may impact such critical topics as evaluating sources of brine contamination in the environment (possibly related to oil and gas production), evaluating the behavior of fluids in the reservoir during hydraulic fracturing, and tracking movement of fluids as a result of geologic CO2 sequestration.


Brine Isometric log-ratio Compositional data analysis Appalachian Basin Produced Water 

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U.S. Geological Survey956 National CenterRestonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA