Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A longitudinal examination of the impact of quality perception gap on brand performance in the US Automotive Industry

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A quality perception gap, defined as the difference between perceived and objective quality, indicates either consumers’ overappreciation or underappreciation of product or brand quality and can have critical effects on performance. The purpose of this research is to examine the impact of a quality perception gap on brand performance and its moderating role in the relationship between marketing-mix signals and performance. Analyses based on a longitudinal dataset from the US automotive industry reveal that the relationship between the quality perception gap and brand performance has an inverted U-shape. Findings also demonstrate that, except for advertising, the impact of marketing signals on performance is higher when the quality of a brand is perceived as higher than its actual quality. Finally, over an 18-year period, the average gap between perceived and objective quality demonstrates a decreasing trend, indicating that the nature of demand in the automotive industry has become more utilitarian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “Actual” and “objective” are used interchangeably in the manuscript.

References

  • Aaker, D. A., & Jacobson, R. (1994). The financial information content of perceived quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, K. D., & Boush, D. M. (2006). Trustmarks, objective-source ratings, and implied investments in advertising: investigating online trust and the context specific nature of internet signals. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 308–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akdeniz, M. B., Calantone, R. J., & Voorhees, C. M. (2014). Signaling quality: an examination of the effects of marketing‐and nonmarketing‐controlled signals on perceptions of automotive brand quality. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 728–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for "lemons": quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assmus, G., Farley, J. U., & Lehmann, D. R. (1984). How advertising affects sales: meta-analysis of econometric results. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(1), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basuroy, S., Desai, K. K., & Talukdar, D. (2006). An empirical investigation of signaling in the motion picture industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, S. G., Tuli, K. R., & Bonfrer, A. (2011). The impact of brand quality on shareholder wealth. Journal of Marketing, 75(5), 88–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A multistage model of customers’ assessments of service quality and value. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, W., & Kirmani, A. (1993). A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, W., & Staelin, R. (1995). Identifying generalizable effects of strategic actions on firm performance: the case of demand-side returns to R&D spending. Marketing Science, 14(3), 222–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, W., Kalra, A., Staelin, R., & Zeithaml, V. (1993). A dynamic process model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronnenberg, B. J., & Wathieu, L. (1996). Asymmetric promotion effects and brand positioning. Marketing Science, 15(4), 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, E. J., Glennon, D. C., & Lane, J. I. (1993). Warranty, quality and price in the U.S. automobile market. Applied Economics, 25(1), 135–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drukker, D. M. (2003). Testing for serial correlation in linear panel-data models. The Stata Journal, 3(2), 168–177.

  • Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (1998). Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 131–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. A. (1984). What does 'product quality’ mean? Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golder, P. N., Mitra, D., & Moorman, C. (2012). What is quality? An integrative framework of processes and states. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juran, J. M. (1974). Quality control handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: a critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64(April), 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopalle, P. K., & Assuncao, J. L. (2000). When (not) to indulge in 'puffery': the role of consumer expectations and brand goodwill in determining advertised and actual product quality. Managerial and Decision Economics, 21, 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopalle, P. K., & Lehmann, D. R. (1995). The effects of advertised and observed quality on expectations about new product quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopalle, P. K., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006). Setting quality expectations when entering a market: what should the promise be? Marketing Science, 25(1), 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kordupleski, E., Rust, R. T., & Zahorik, A. J. (1993). Why improving quality doesn't improve quality (or whatever happened to marketing? California Management Review, 35(3), 82–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis, A. (1977). Theory of econometrics. 2nd Edition, Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Mannering, F., & Winston, C. (1991). Brand loyalty and the decline of American automobile firms," in Brookings Paper on Economic Activity: Microeconomics: The Brookings Institution, 67–103.

  • Miller, S. (2008). Kudzu.com survey reveals online reviews significantly impact consumer spending. Available at http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/kudzucom-survey-reveals-online-reviews-significantly-impact-consumer-spending-65356157.html (viewed on Aug 6, 2015).

  • Mitra, D., & Golder, P. N. (2006). How does objective quality affect perceived quality? Short-term effects, long-terms effects, and asymmetries. Marketing Science, 25(3), 230–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N. A., & Vorhies, D. W. (2001). Product quality alignment and business unit performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 396–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, M. C., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Chandukala, S. R. (2014). Green claims and message frames: how green new products change brand attitude. Journal of Marketing, 78(5), 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhan, V., & Rao, R. C. (1993). Warranty policy and extended service contracts: theory and an application to automobiles. Marketing Science, 12(3), 230–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(Autumn), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purohit, D. (1997). Dual distribution channels: the competition between rental agencies and dealers. Marketing Science, 16(3), 228–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A. R., Lu, Q., & Robert, W. R. (1999). Signaling unobservable product quality through a brand ally. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 258–268.

  • Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2006). The liability of good reputation: a study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organization Science, 17(1), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R. T., Inman, J., Jia, J., & Zahorik, A. (1999). What you don't know about perceived quality: the role of customer expectation distributions. Marketing Science, 18(1), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I., & Rosen, E. (2014). What marketers misunderstand about online reviews. Harvard Business Review, 23–25.

  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., Heerde, H. J. V., & Geyskens, I. (2010). What makes consumers willing to pay a price premium for national brands over private labels? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1011–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T., Fang, E., & Wang, F. (2014). Is neutral really neutral? The effects of neutral user-generated content on product sales. Journal of Marketing, 78(4), 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli, N. T., Sorescu, A., & Chandy, R. (2014). Employee-based brand equity: why firms with strong brands pay their executives less. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 676–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G. J. (1988). The price elasticity of selective demand: a meta-analysis of econometric models of sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(4), 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G. J., & Johnson, J. (2007). The value of quality. Marketing Science, 26(6), 758–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakratsas, D., & Ambler, T. (1999). How advertising works: What do we really know? Journal of Marketing, 26–43.

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1988). Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality: an example of signalling by posting a bond. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(3), 458–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. Mason: Thomson South Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H. (2000). Raising awareness and signaling quality to uninformed consumers: a price advertising model. Marketing Science, 19(4), 390–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marketing, Peter T. Paul College of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA

    M. Billur Akdeniz

  2. Department of Marketing, Eli Broad College of Business, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Roger J. Calantone

Authors
  1. M. Billur Akdeniz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roger J. Calantone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Billur Akdeniz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akdeniz, M.B., Calantone, R.J. A longitudinal examination of the impact of quality perception gap on brand performance in the US Automotive Industry. Mark Lett 28, 43–57 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9392-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9392-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation