Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of minimum contract durations on customer retention

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Customer retention is a major driver of customer lifetime value and is thus a key performance metric in marketing management. Consequently, companies try to retain customers by offering contracts with minimum contract durations (MCD). Using behavioral, psychometric, and advertising data for a large sample of DSL customers, the authors study the impact of minimum contract durations on actual customer churn behavior. The analyses demonstrate that subscriptions with minimum contract durations do indeed help companies to successfully retain customers. The effect is impaired though, as companies typically (must) provide incentives to convince customers to commit to those contracts. We find that incentives attract customers that either cannot or should not be retained and hence require companies to carefully apply both MCD and incentives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To check for possible changes in the respondents’ perception, we repeated the survey exactly 1 year later. Because the responses reveal no significant differences for the relevant measures, we treat the measures as time-invariant in our analyses.

  2. As the hazard of defection increases with time (see also shape parameter p), the Weibull distribution provided superior results compared to other distributions (e.g., gamma, exponential).

References

  • Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1984). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8(4), 310–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, J. (1979). Toward a concept of domesticated markets. Journal of Marketing, 43(4), 69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, H. S., Taylor, S. F., & St-James, Y. (2005). “Migrating” to new service providers: Toward a unifying framework of consumers’ switching behaviors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B. (1998). When customers are members: Customer retention in paid membership contexts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. N. (1998). A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Science, 17(1), 45.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. N., & Lemon, K. N. (1999). A dynamic model of customers’ usage of services: Usage as an antecedent and consequence of satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Vigna, S., & Malmendier, U. (2006). Paying not to go to the gym. American Economic Review, 96(3), 694–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eroglu, S. A., & Machleit, K. A. (1990). An empirical study of retail crowding: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Retailing, 66(2), 201–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, D., & Rusbult, C. E. (1981). Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28(1), 78–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-Out. American Economic Review, 87(4), 746–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B., & Weiss, A. M. (1995). Vendor consideration and switching behavior for buyers in high-technology markets. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, R. J., Green, R. T., & Saegert, J. (1978). A cross-national study of perceived risk. Journal of Marketing, 42(3), 102–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-J., Byun, S.-K., & Park, M.-C. (2004). Mobile handset subsidy policy in Korea: Historical analysis and evaluation. Telecommunications Policy, 28, 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. (1995). Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Review of Economic Studies, 62(213), 515–539.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, M., & Murthy, B. (2004). Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: An illustration from a business-to-business service context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C. (2012). Paying with money or with effort: Pricing when customers anticipate hassle. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(1), 66–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miravete, E. J. (2003). Choosing the wrong calling plan? Ignorance and learning. American Economic Review, 93(1), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. G. (1969). On the interpretation of discriminant analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 6(2), 156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89(1), 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2000). The economics of immediate gratification. Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prins, R., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007). Marketing communication drivers of adoption timing of a new E-service among existing customers. Journal of Marketing, 71(2), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N., & Parvatiyar, A. (1995). Relationship marketing in consumer markets: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2004). First in, first out? The effects of network externalities on pioneer survival. Journal of Marketing, 68(January), 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Gielens, K. (2003). Consumer and market drivers of the trial probability of new consumer packaged goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 368–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, M., Hämmäinen, H., Töyli, J., Kamppari, S., & Kivi, A. (2007). Impacts of handset bundling on mobile data usage: The case of Finland. Telecommunications Policy, 31(10–11), 648–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

    Article  MATH  CAS  MathSciNet  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, K. L., & Barnes, J. H. (1996). Retailing hedonic consumption: A model of sales promotion of a leisure service. Journal of Retailing, 72(4), 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, L., Wang, S., & Lai, K. K. (2009). An intelligent-agent-based fuzzy group decision making model for financial multicriteria decision support: The case of credit scoring. European Journal of Operational Research, 195(3), 942–959.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan U. Becker.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Measurement and descriptives of variables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becker, J.U., Spann, M. & Schulze, T. Implications of minimum contract durations on customer retention. Mark Lett 26, 579–592 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9293-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9293-2

Keywords

Navigation