Skip to main content
Log in

Targeting Miss Daisy: Using age and gender to target unethical sales tactics

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marketers often advocate the use of targeted promotional strategies because they are presumed more effective. However, common targeting variables (gender and age) can also serve to stereotype some consumers (female or older) as more vulnerable to sales pressure. The current research shows that this can cause sales agents to target these stigmatized groups with inferior products. In contrast, encouraging sales agents to empathize with target customers was effective in reducing the targeting of these groups with substandard items. Implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainscough, T. L., & Motley, C. M. (2000). Will you help me please? The effects of race, gender and manner of dress on retail service. Marketing Letters, 11, 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, I., & Siegelman, P. (1995). Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. The American Economic Review, 85, 304–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Marina, P. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., et al. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1985). Prejudice, categorization, and particularization: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 79–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Norton, M. I., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: the pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, H. J. (1973). The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., & Skinner, S. J. (1988). Ethical behavior and bureaucratic structure in marketing research organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, A., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. G., Henderson, G. R., & Williams, J. D. (2005). Courting customers: assessing consumer racial profiling and other marketplace discrimination. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, T., & King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality and social interaction (pp. 69–121). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. A., Porter, R. J., & Mateljan, P. L. (1971). Racial discrimination in apartment rentals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 364–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theory of stereotype activation and application. Psychology Bulletin, 129, 522–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (1991). Fostering ethical marketing decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. (1999). Taco Bell and Latino stereotypes. Latino USA. http://faculty.irsc.edu/FACULTY/VTempone/Latino%20USA.pdf. Accessed 29 March 2007

  • McGarty, C., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Spears, R. (2002). Stereotypes as explanations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moschis, G. P., Mosteller, J., & Fatt, C. K. (2011). Research frontiers on older consumers’ vulnerability. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 45, 467–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economics, 78, 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Fair Trading (2007). Research on impact of mass marketed scams: a summary of research into the impact of scams on UK consumers. http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_protection/oft883.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2012

  • Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62, 659–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. D. (1971). Black child, White child: the development of racial attitudes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: the contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringold, D. J. (1995). Social criticism of target marketing: process or product. American Behavioral Science, 38, 578–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C., & Cooper-Martin, E. (1997). Ethics and target marketing: the role of product harm and consumer vulnerability. Journal of Marketing, 61, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Census Bureau (2010). Population by sex and selected age groups: 2000 and 2010. http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2012

  • Whitley, B. E., & Kite, M. E. (2006). The psychology of prejudice and discrimination. Belmont: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., &Wilkinson, W. W. (2002). Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, empathy, and prejudice: a test of three models. American Psychological Society Conference, New Orleans.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a standard research grant from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly O. Cowart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cowart, K.O., Darke, P. Targeting Miss Daisy: Using age and gender to target unethical sales tactics. Mark Lett 25, 67–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9242-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9242-5

Keywords

Navigation