Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Novel versus familiar brands: An analysis of neurophysiology, response latency, and choice

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to analyze neurophysiological activation, response latency, and actual brand choice concerning novel and familiar brands. The results show that (1) the choice of novel brands (compared to the choice of familiar brands) is preceded by increased activation of both the cingulate gyrus and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, as measured by a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study; (2) novel brands are associated with longer choice response latency than familiar brands; and (3) positive mood enhances response latency of choosing novel brands compared to familiar brands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amano, T., Duvarci, S., Popa, D., & Paré, D. (2011). The fear circuit revisited: Contributions of the basal amygdala nuclei to conditioned fear. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(43), 15481–15489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, D. R., Schächinger, H., Neuhoff, J. G., Esposito, F., Di Salle, F., Lehmann, C., et al. (2008). Rising sound intensity: An intrinsic warning cue activating the amygdala. Cerebral Cortex, 18(1), 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, K. C. (1996). Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 20(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizer, G. Y., Tormala, Z. L., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2006). Memory-based versus on-line processing: Implications for attitude strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 646–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G., Vogt, B. A., Holmes, J., Dale, A. M., Greve, D., Jenike, M. A., et al. (2002). Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: A role in reward-based decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(1), 523–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, K. A., Janiszewski, C., Keeney, R. L., Krantz, D. H., Kunreuther, H. C., Luce, M. F., et al. (2008). A theoretical framework for goal-based choice and for prescriptive analysis. Marketing Letters, 19(3), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M., Chan, A., & Sze, S. (2010). Electrophysiological correlates of brand names. Neuroscience Letters, 485(3), 178–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronley, M. L., Mantel, S. P., & Kardes, F. R. (2010). Effects of accuracy motivation and need to evaluate on mode of attitude formation and attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(3), 274–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, W. R., Madden, T. J., Kirmani, A., & Mukherjee, S. (2001). Understanding what’s in a brand rating: A model for assessing brand and attribute effects and their relationship to brand equity. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(4), 415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esch, F., Moell, T., Schmitt, B., Elger, C., Neuhaus, C., & Weber, B. (2012). Brands on the brain: Do consumers use declarative information or experienced emotions to evaluate brands? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, X., Singh, S., & Ahluwalia, R. (2007). An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Shapira, O. (2009). Preparing for novel versus familiar events: Shifts in global and local processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, D., & Clemen, R. (1994). Beyond expected utility: Rethinking behavioral decision research. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, M. (1958). Curiosity, exploratory drive, and stimulus satiation. Psychological Bulletin, 55(5), 302–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, P. W., Geise, J. A., & Cote, J. A. (2004). Impression management using typeface design. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herr, P. M., & Page, C. M. (2004). Asymmetric association of liking and disliking judgments: So what’s not to like? Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 588–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herr, P. M., Page, C. M., Pfeiffer, B. E., & Davis, D. F. (2012). Affective influences on evaluative processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 833–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K., & Hastie, R. (2006). Decision and experience: Why don’t we choose what makes us happy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Camerer, C. (2005). Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science, 310(5754), 1680–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (1993). Positive affect and decision making. In J. M. Haviland (Ed.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 261–277). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Geva, N. (1987). The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(2), 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Patrick, R. (1983). The effect of positive feelings on risk-taking: When the chips are down. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 31(2), 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiszewski, C., & Meyvis, T. (2001). Effects of brand logo complexity, repetition, and spacing on processing fluency and judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, B., & Isen, A. (1993). The influence of positive affect on variety seeking among safe, enjoyable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardes, F. R. (1988). Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: The effects of conclusion omission and involvement on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. (2009). Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(2–3), 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006). Brands and branding: Research findings and future priorities. Marketing Science, 25(6), 740–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennerley, S., Walton, M., Behrens, T., Buckley, M., & Rushworth, M. (2006). Optimal decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9(7), 940–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber-Riel, W. (1979). Activation research: Psychobiological approaches in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(4), 240–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. FL: Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. Y., & Sternthal, B. (1999). The effects of positive mood on memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(2), 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Xue, G., Weller, J. A., Reimann, M., Lauriola, M., & Bechara, A. (2012). A neuropsychological approach to understanding risk-taking for potential gains and losses. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6(15), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, & K. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of affective science (pp. 619–642). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, S. M., Li, J., Tomlin, D., Cypert, K. S., Montague, L. M., & Montague, P. R. (2004). Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron, 44(2), 379–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., & Cooke, A. D. J. (1998). Judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 447–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobel, C. (2011). Clay Christensen’s milkshake marketing, Harvard Business School working knowledge, February 14, 2011, available at: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6496.html.

  • Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, M. T. (2004). The logic of feeling. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, M. (2007). Emotions and rationality: A critical review and interpretation of empirical evidence. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, M., & Bechara, A. (2010). The somatic marker framework as a neurological theory of decision-making: Review, conceptual comparisons, and future neuroeconomic research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(5), 767–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, M., Zaichkowsky, J., Neuhaus, C., Bender, T., & Weber, B. (2010). Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, M., Schilke, O., Weber, B., Neuhaus, C., & Zaichkowsky, J. (2011). Functional magnetic resonance imaging in consumer research: A review and application. Psychology and Marketing, 28(6), 608–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, M., Castaño, R., Zaichkowsky, J., & Bechara, A. (2012). How we relate to brands: Psychological and neurophysiological insights into consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, M., Feye, W., Malter, A. J., Ackerman, J., Castaño, R., Garg, N., Kreuzbauer, R., Labroo, A. A., Lee, A. Y., Morrin, M., Nenkov, G. Y., Nielsen, J. H., Perez, M., Pol, G., Rosa, J. A., Yoon, C., & Zhong, C. (2012b). Embodiment in judgment and choice, Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5(2), 104–123.

  • Roehm, H. A., & Roehm, M. L. (2005). Revisiting the effect of positive mood on variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 330–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel, J. A., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 57(3), 493–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Kardes, F. R. (1988). The effects of physiological arousal on information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 379–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, J. P., Seixas, D., Brandao, S., & Moutinho, L. (2011). Investigating the role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in the assessment of brands. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, M., & Rotte, M. (2007). Favorite brands as cultural objects modulate reward circuit. NeuroReport, 18(2), 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J., & Hall, J. (2011). Why most product launches fail. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. In: J. P. Forgas (Ed.). Emotion and social judgment (pp. 55–71): Elmsford: Pergamon.

  • Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (2002). Spontaneous versus controlled influences of stimulus based affect on choice behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(2), 342–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiv, B., & Huber, J. (2000). The impact of anticipating satisfaction on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stayman, D. M., & Kardes, F. R. (1992). Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: Effects of need for cognition and self-monitoring on inference generation and utilization. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(2), 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychology Review, 117(2), 440–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. I., & Manoj, T. (2011). When do feelings of fluency matter? How abstract and concrete thinking influence fluency effects. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, A. E., Schafe, G. E., Kristensen, M. P., & LeDoux, J. E. (2006). Rethinking the fear circuit: The central nucleus of the amygdala is required for the acquisiton, consolidation, and expression of Pavlovian fear conditioning. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(48), 12387–12396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, R. A. (1978). Catecholamine theories of reward: A critical review. Brain Research, 152(2), 215–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, R. A., & Rompre, P.-P. (1989). Brain dopamine and reward. Annual Review of Psychology, 40(1), 191–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, G., Lu, Z., Levin, I. P., Weller, J. A., Li, X., & Bechara, A. (2009). Functional dissociations of risk and reward processing in the medial prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 19(5), 1019–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C., Gutchess, A. H., Feinberg, F., & Polk, T. A. (2006). A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of neural dissociations between brand and person judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorkston, E., & Menon, G. (2004). A sound idea: Phonetic effects of brand names on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the editor, Frank Kardes, and two anonymous reviewers as well as Oliver Schilke and Gui Xue, and the session audiences of the 2010 Association for Consumer Research Annual Conference and the 2011 American Marketing Association Summer Conference for valuable comments on earlier versions of this research. This work was supported by a generous grant from the Google & WPP Marketing Research Awards Program, Grant #2009-10.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Reimann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reimann, M., Castaño, R., Zaichkowsky, J. et al. Novel versus familiar brands: An analysis of neurophysiology, response latency, and choice. Mark Lett 23, 745–759 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9176-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9176-3

Keywords

Navigation