Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Missed Opportunities in Neonatal Deaths in Rwanda: Applying the Three Delays Model in a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Neonatal Death

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective Administered in a timely manner, current evidence-based interventions could reduce neonatal deaths from infections, intrapartum injuries and complications due to prematurity. The three delays model (delay in seeking care, in arriving at a health facility, and in receiving adequate care), which has been applied to understanding maternal deaths, may be useful for understanding neonatal deaths. We assess the main causes of neonatal deaths in Rwanda and their associated delays. Methods Using a cross-sectional study design, we evaluated data from 2012 from 40 facilities in which babies were delivered. Audit committees in each facility reviewed each neonatal death in the facility and reported finding to the Ministry of Health using structured questionnaires. Information from questionnaires were centralized in an electronic database. At the end of 2012, records from 40 health facilities across Rwanda’s five provinces (mainly district hospitals) were available in the database and were used for this analysis. Results Of the 1324 neonates, the major causes of death were: asphyxia and its complications (36.7%), lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) (22.5%), and prematurity (22.4%). At least one delay was experienced by nearly three-quarters of neonates: Maternal Delay in Seeking Care 22.1%, Maternal Delay in Arrival to Care 11.2%, Maternal Delay in Adequate Care 14.2%, Neonatal Delay in Seeking Care 8.1%, Neonatal Delay in Arrival to Care 9.3%, and Neonatal Delay in Adequate Care 29.1%. Neonates with each of the main causes of death had statistically significantly increased odds of experiencing Maternal Delay in Seeking Care. Asphyxia deaths had increased odds of experiencing all three Maternal Delays. LRTI deaths had increased odds of all three Neonatal Delays. Conclusion Delays for women in seeking obstetrical care is a critical factor associated with the main causes of neonatal death in Rwanda. Improving obstetrical care quality could reduce neonatal deaths due to asphyxia. Likewise, reducing all three delays could reduce neonatal deaths due to LRTI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, A. K., et al. (2013). Accuracy of WHO verbal autopsy tool in determining major causes of neonatal deaths in India. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e54865.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bhutta, Z. A., et al. (2014). Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? The Lancet, 384(9940), 347–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhutta, Z. A., et al. (2013). Interventions to address deaths from childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea equitably: What works and at what cost? The Lancet, 381(9875), 1417–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binagwaho, A., et al. (2014). Rwanda 20 years on: Investing in life. The Lancet, 384(9940), 371–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalumeau, M., et al. (2000). Risk factors for perinatal mortality in West Africa: A population-based study of 20326 pregnancies. MOMA group. Acta Paediatrica, 89(9), 1115–1121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coldham, C., et al. (2000). Prospective validation of a standardized questionnaire for estimating childhood mortality and morbidity due to pneumonia and diarrhoea. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 5(2), 134–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Launay, E., et al. (2016). Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: Proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST). BMC Medicine, 14(1), 146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, J. E., et al. (2014). Every Newborn: Progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. The Lancet, 384(9938), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., et al. (2011). Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: A systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect. BMC Public Health, 11(Suppl 3), S12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Logie, D. E., Rowson, M., & Ndagije, F. (2008). Innovations in Rwanda’s health system: Looking to the future. The Lancet, 372(9634), 256–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. R., et al. (2003). Validation of verbal autopsy to determine the cause of 137 neonatal deaths in Karachi, Pakistan. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 17(2), 132–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mbaruku, G., et al. (2009). Perinatal audit using the 3-delays model in western Tanzania. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 106(1), 85–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C., et al. (2014). Using verbal autopsy to measure causes of death: The comparative performance of existing methods. BMC Medicine, 12(1), 5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Network, H. N. (2015). Database: Global and national newborn health data and indicators. Save the children.

  • Thaddeus, S., & Maine, D. (1994). Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context. Social Science & Medicine, 38(8), 1091–1110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thatte, N., et al. (2009). Ascertaining causes of neonatal deaths using verbal autopsy: Current methods and challenges. Journal of Perinatology, 29(3), 187–194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (2011). Levels and trends in child mortality, 2011. New York: United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay, R. P., Rai, S. K., & Krishnan, A. (2013). Using three delays model to understand the social factors responsible for neonatal deaths in rural Haryana, India. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 59(2), 100–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waiswa, P., et al. (2010). Using the three delays model to understand why newborn babies die in eastern Uganda. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 15(8), 964–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakabi, W. (2007). Rwanda makes health-facility deliveries more feasible. The Lancet, 370(9595), 1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., et al. (2014). Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990? 2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet, 384, 957–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2004). WHO technical consultation on verbal autopsy tools: Final report (p. 45). World Health Organization.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Delanyo Dovlo and Dr. Maria Mugabo (WHO, Rwanda) for technical assistance and support. We also thank Dr. Bucyana Tatien and the team at the Maternal and Child Health division of the Ministry of Health, Rwanda for the provision of the data set and all technical support that was needed in translating the original dataset to English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Efua Wilmot.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 81 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilmot, E., Yotebieng, M., Norris, A. et al. Missed Opportunities in Neonatal Deaths in Rwanda: Applying the Three Delays Model in a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Neonatal Death. Matern Child Health J 21, 1121–1129 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2210-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2210-y

Keywords

Navigation