Possible Ideas of Necessity in Indian Logic
First Online: 12 January 2011 Received: 14 January 2010 Accepted: 15 December 2010 DOI:
Cite this article as: Sarukkai, S. J Philos Logic (2011) 40: 563. doi:10.1007/s10992-010-9169-8 Abstract
It is often remarked that Indian logic (IL) has no conception of necessity. But what kind of necessity is absent in this system? Logical necessity is presumably absent: the structure of the logical argument in IL is often given as a reason for this claim. However even a cursory understanding of IL illustrates an abiding attempt to formulate the idea of necessity. In Dharmakīrti's classification of inferences, one can detect the formal process of entailment in the inferences arising from class inclusion. In Western philosophy, Leibniz's invocation of 'contingent necessity' as distinguished from the 'necessary necessity' is part of a tradition that finds value in the idea of contingent necessity. In contemporary philosophy, this has been championed by Armstrong, specifically in the context of understanding the necessity inherent in scientific laws. In IL, the analysis of 'invariable concomitance' (vyāpti) is of crucial importance and its definitions are very complex. This paper argues how vyāpti can be understood in terms of contingent necessity and also how the complex definitions can be interpreted as an attempt to define contingent necessity in terms of 'logical' necessity.
Keywords Necessity Analyticity Vyāpti Pervasion Invariable concomitance Everpresent properties Possible worlds Scientific law Absence Limitors References
Armstrong, D. M. (1985).
What is a law of nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bhattacharyya, S. (1974). Some features of Navya-Nyāya logic.
Philosophy East and West, 24
Bhattacharyya, S. (1987).
Doubt, belief and knowledge. Delhi: ICPR.
Chakrabarti, K. K. (1976). Some comparisons between Frege’s logic and Navya-Nyāya logic.
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 36
Chakrabarti, K. K. (1987). The svabhāvahetu in Dharmakīrti’s logic.
Philosophy East and West, 37
Chakraborty, K. (1978). Definition of vyāpti (pervasion) in NavyaNyāya: a critical survey.
Journal of Indian Philosophy, 5
Chakravarti, R.-P. (2002). A comparative treatment of the paradox of confirmation.
Journal of Indian Philosophy, 30
Chatterjee, A. (1996).
Natural laws, accidental generalizations and vyāpti (pp. 123–150). III: Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences.
Dunne, J. (2004).
Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s philosophy. Wisdom Publications.
Ellis, B. (2001).
Scientific essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fine, K. (2005).
Modality and tense: Philosophical papers
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ganeri, J. (2009).
Analytic philosophy in early modern India
. Retrieved December 24, 2009 from
Grayling, A. C. (1997).
An introduction to philosophical logic. Oxford: Blackwell.
Guha, D. C. (1979).
Navya Nyāya system of logic. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Itzykson, C., & Zuber, J.-B. (1980).
Quantum field theory. McGraw Hill.
Kneale, W. (1961). Universality and necessity.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, XII
Lange, M. (2008). Why contingent facts cannot necessities make.
Lewis, D. (1973).
Counterfactuals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Matilal, B. K. (1968). Gaṅgeśa on the concept of universal property (Kevalānvayin).
Philosophy East and West, 18
Matilal, B. K. (1968).
The Navya-nyāya doctrine of negation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Matilal, B. K. (1985).
Logic, language and reality. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Matilal, B. K. (1999). In J. Ganeri & H. Tiwari (Eds.),
The character of logic in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Matilal, B. K. (2004). In H. Tiwari (Ed.),
Necessity and Indian logic. Delhi: Chronicle Books.
Mumford, S. (2004).
Laws in nature
. London: Routledge.
Perrett, R. W. (1984). The problem of induction in Indian philosophy.
Philosophy East and West, 34
Phillips, S., & Tatacharya, R. (2002).
Gaṅgeśa on the upadhi. Delhi: ICPR.
Potter, K. H. (1992). The karmic a priori in Indian philosophy.
Philosophy East and West, 42
Quine, W. V. (1947). The problem of interpreting modal logic.
The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12
Quine, W. V. (1961). Two dogmas of empiricism. In W. V. Quine (Ed.),
From a logical point of view (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sarukkai, S. (2004).
Philosophy of symmetry. Shimla: IIAS.
Sarukkai, S. (2005).
Indian philosophy and philosophy of science. Delhi: CSC/Motilal Banarsidass.
Sarukkai, S. (2008). A semiotic interpretation of Indian logic. In M. K. Chakraborti et al. (Eds.),
Logic, Navya-Nyāya & applications (pp. 287–304). London: College Publications.
Swinburne, R. G. (1975). Analyticity, necessity and apriority.
Vaidya, A. V. (2006). The metaphysical foundation of logic.
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 35
CrossRef Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011