Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 439–501

Monkey semantics: two ‘dialects’ of Campbell’s monkey alarm calls

Authors

    • Institut Jean-Nicod, CNRS
  • Emmanuel Chemla
    • LSCP, CNRS
  • Kate Arnold
    • School of Psychology & NeuroscienceUniversity of St Andrews
  • Alban Lemasson
    • Université de Rennes 1, Laboratoire d’éthologie animale et humaine, UMR 6552 – C.N.R.S.
    • Institut Universitaire de France, Maison des universités
  • Karim Ouattara
    • Laboratory of Zoology and Animal BiologyUniversity Félix Houphouet Boigny Côte d’Ivoire
  • Sumir Keenan
    • School of Psychology & NeuroscienceUniversity of St Andrews
  • Claudia Stephan
    • Institute of Biology, Department of Comparative CognitionUniversity of Neuchâtel
    • School of Psychology and NeuroscienceUniversity of St Andrews
  • Robin Ryder
    • Centre de Recherche en Mathématiques de la DécisionUniversité Paris-Dauphine
  • Klaus Zuberbühler
    • School of Psychology & NeuroscienceUniversity of St Andrews
    • Cognitive Science CentreUniversity of Neuchâtel
Research Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10988-014-9155-7

Cite this article as:
Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Arnold, K. et al. Linguist and Philos (2014) 37: 439. doi:10.1007/s10988-014-9155-7

Abstract

We develop a formal semantic analysis of the alarm calls used by Campbell’s monkeys in the Tai forest (Ivory Coast) and on Tiwai island (Sierra Leone)—two sites that differ in the main predators that the monkeys are exposed to (eagles on Tiwai vs. eagles and leopards in Tai). Building on data discussed in Ouattara et al. (PLoS ONE 4(11):e7808, 2009a; PNAS 106(51): 22026–22031, 2009b and Arnold et al. (Population differences in wild Campbell’s monkeys alarm call use, 2013), we argue that on both sites alarm calls include the roots krak and hok, which can optionally be affixed with -oo, a kind of attenuating suffix; in addition, sentences can start with boom boom, which indicates that the context is not one of predation. In line with Arnold et al., we show that the meaning of the roots is not quite the same in Tai and on Tiwai: krak often functions as a leopard alarm call in Tai, but as a general alarm call on Tiwai. We develop models based on a compositional semantics in which concatenation is interpreted as conjunction, roots have lexical meanings, -oo is an attenuating suffix, and an all-purpose alarm parameter is raised with each individual call. The first model accounts for the difference between Tai and Tiwai by way of different lexical entries for krak. The second model gives the same underspecified entry to krak in both locations (= general alarm call), but it makes use of a competition mechanism akin to scalar implicatures. In Tai, strengthening yields a meaning equivalent to non-aerial dangerous predator and turns out to single out leopards. On Tiwai, strengthening yields a nearly contradictory meaning due to the absence of ground predators, and only the unstrengthened meaning is used.

Keywords

Primate linguisticsPrimate semanticsAlarm callsPrimate communication
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014