Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Existentials, predication, and modification

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper offers a new semantic theory of existentials (sentences of the form There be NP pivot XP coda ) in which pivots are (second order) predicates and codas are modifiers. The theory retains the analysis of pivots as denoting generalized quantifiers (Barwise and Cooper 1981; Keenan 1987), but departs from previous analyses in analyzing codas as contextual modifiers on a par with temporal/locative frame adverbials. Existing analyses universally assume that pivots are arguments of some predicate, and that codas are main or secondary predicates. It is shown that these analyses cannot account for the behavior of codas with quantifiers and for the interaction of multiple codas, both of which receive a simple treatment on the proposed theory. The assimilation of codas to frame adverbials explains several semantic properties which have not been analyzed in the semantic literature, and that distinguish existentials from their copular counterparts. Furthermore, it highlights important properties of the semantics of modification and its relation to predication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artstein R. (2005) Quantificational arguments in temporal adjunct clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 28(5): 541–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babby L.H. (1980) Existential sentences and negation in Russian. Ann Arbor, MI, Karoma Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker C., Jacobson P. (2007) Direct compositionality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J., Cooper R. (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer W. (1993) Maori. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D., Francez, I., & Levinson, D. (2006). Bad subject! (non)-canonicality and NP distribution in existentials. In E. Georgala & J. Howell (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT XV. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

  • Bolinger D. (1967) Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18(1): 1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borschev, V., & Partee, B. (2001). The Russian genitive of negation in existentials sentences: The role of Theme-Rheme structure reconsidered. In E. Hajičová, P. Sgall, J. Hana, & T. Hoskovec (Eds.), Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague (Vol. 4, pp. 185–250). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Caponigro, I., & Pearl, L. (2008). Silent prepositions: Evidence from free relatives. In A. Asbury, J. Dotlaèil, B. Gehrke, & R. Nouwen (Eds.), The syntax and semantics of spatial P. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Chierchia G. (1985) Formal semantics and the grammar of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3): 417–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia G. (1992) Anaphora and dynamic binding. Linguistics and Philosophy 15(2): 111–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia G. (1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia G., Turner R. (1988) Semantics and property theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 11(3): 261–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung S., Ladusaw W.A. (2004) Restriction and saturation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Condoravdi, C. (2008). Punctual until as a scalar NPI. In The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparksy (pp. 631–655). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Condoravdi C., Gawron J.M. (1996) The context-dependency of implicit arguments. In: Kanazawa M., Piñón C., de Swart H. (eds) Quantifiers, deduction and context. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal V. (1998) ANY as inherently modal. Linguistics and Philosophy 21(5): 433–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Swart H. (1996) Meaning and use of not until. Journal of Semantics 13(3): 221–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Declerck, R. (1995). The problem of not . . . until. Linguistics (33), 51–98.

  • Doron, E. (1983). Verbless predicates in Hebrew. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

  • Dowty D.R. (1979) Word meaning and montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in montague’s PTQ. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty D. (1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emonds J. (1976) A transformational approach to English syntax. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Erteschik Shir N. (1997) The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Y. (2004). The Hebrew present-tense copula as a mixed category. In M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 04 conference, University of Canterbury, (pp. 226–246). On-line: CSLI Publications.

  • Francez, I. (2007a). Existental propositions. PhD thesis, Stanford University.

  • Francez, I. (2007b). Quantification in the coda of existentials. In M. Aloni, P. Dekker, & F. Roelofsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam colloquium.

  • Francez N., Steedman M. (2006) Categorial grammar and the semantics of contextual preposition phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 29(4): 381–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze R. (1992) Existentials and other locatives. Language 68(3): 553–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendler Szabó Z. (2006) Counting across times. Philosophical Perspectives 20(1): 399–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A. (2001). The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2459–735.

  • Giannakidou A. (2002) UNTIL, aspect, and negation: A novel argument for two untils. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 12: 84–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris S.H. (1994) Factories of death: Japanese biological warfare and the American coverup. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazout I. (2004) The syntax of existential constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 393–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim I. (1987) Where does the definiteness constraint apply? Evidence from the definiteness of variables. In: Reuland E., ter Meulen A. (eds) The representation of (In)definiteness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim I. (1991) Atikel und Definiteheit. In: von Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds) Hanbuch der Semantik. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. PhD thesis, UCLA.

  • Horn, L. (2000). Any and (-)ever: Free choice and free relatives. In A. Z. Weyner (Ed.), Proceedings of IATL 15 (pp. 71–111).

  • Jenkins L. (1975) The English existential. Tübingen, Niemeyer

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L. (1974). Until. In Papers fromthe 10th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 283–297).

  • Keenan E. (1987) A semantic definition of indefinite NP. In: Reuland E., ter Meulen A. (eds) The representation of (in)definiteness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 286–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E. (2003) The definiteness effect: Semantics or pragmatics?. Natural Language Semantics 11(2): 187–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (1997). A situation semantic account of existential sentences. PhD thesis, Stanford University.

  • Kimball J. (1973) The grammar of existence. In: Corum C., Smith-Stark C.T., Weiser A. (eds) Papers from the ninth regional meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago, IL, CLS, pp 262–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno S. (1971) The position of locatives in existential sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 2(3): 233–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda S.Y. (1972) The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of Language 9: 153–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht K. (1994) Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht K. (2000) When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence focus constructions across languages. Studies in Language 24(3): 611–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson R. (1985) Bare–NP adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 595–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. (2000). Temporal modification in nominals. Handout of paper presented at the International Round Table “The Syntax of Tense and Aspect” Paris, France.

  • Lumsden M. (1988) Existential sentences: Their structure and meaning. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • May R. (1985) Logical form. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley J. (1988) Adverbial NPs: Bare or clad in see–through garb?. Language 64(3): 683–590

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally L. (1992) An interpretation for the English existential construction. Garland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally L. (1998) Existential sentences without existential quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 21(4): 353–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milsark, G. (1974). Existential sentences in English. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • Milsark G. (1977) Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro A. (1997) The raising of predicates. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard C., Sag I. (1994) Head driven phrase structure grammar. CSLI publications, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt I., Francez N. (2001) Temporal prepositions and temporal generalized quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 24(2): 187–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M. (1995). Indefinites, adverbs of quantification, and focus semantics. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 265–299). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Safir, K. (1982). Syntactic chains and the definiteness effect. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • Sasse H.-J. (1995) “Theticity” and VS order: A case study. Sprachtypologie und Unversalienforschung 48(1): 3–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J., & Gendler Szabó, Z. (2000). On quantifier domain restriction. Mind and Language, 15 (2 and 3), 219–261.

  • Stowell, T. (1978). What was there before there was there. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen, & K.W. Todrys (Eds.), Proceedings of CLS 14 (pp. 458–471).

  • von Fintel K. (1997) Bare plurals, bare conditionals, and only. Journal of Semantics 14(1): 1–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow A. (2002) Temporal prepositional phrases with quantifiers: Some additions to Pratt and Francez (2001). Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5): 755–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerståhl, D. (1984). Determiners and context sets. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Generalized quantifiers in natural language (pp. 45–71). Dordrecht: Floris.

  • Williams E. (1980) Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams E. (1984) There-insertion. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 131–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucchi A. (1995) The ingredients of definiteness and the definiteness effect. Natural Language Semantics 3(1): 33–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago, 1010 E 59th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

    Itamar Francez

Authors
  1. Itamar Francez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Itamar Francez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francez, I. Existentials, predication, and modification. Linguist and Philos 32, 1–50 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9055-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9055-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation