Abstract
In Spanish (and other Romance languages) certain predicates select the subjunctive mood in the embedded clause, while others select the indicative mood. In this paper, I present a new analysis for the predicates that select the subjunctive mood in Spanish that is based on a semantics of comparison. The main generalization proposed here is the following: in Spanish, a predicate selects the subjunctive mood in its embedded proposition if the proposition is compared to its contextual alternatives on a scale introduced by the predicate. In this proposal, predicates that select the subjunctive mood are thus analyzed as gradable predicates. Furthermore, the subjunctive mood morpheme is claimed to make a semantic contribution, namely to evaluate the contextual alternatives that are compared by the predicate. In comparing this proposal to other approaches, I show that it can more straightforwardly account for a number of properties of these predicates (entailment relations, practical inferences, and contexts with more than two alternatives). New empirical evidence for two crucial properties of the predicates that select the subjunctive mood is provided: these predicates are focus sensitive and they are gradable, two properties that follow directly from the proposal developed here. In the vast literature on mood, the link between the appearance of the subjunctive mood and these important properties has never been made before.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartsch R., Venneman T. (1973) Semantic structures: A study in the relation between syntax and semantics. Athenäum Verlag, Frankfurt
Beck S. (2006) Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14: 1–56
Beck S. (2007) The grammar of focus interpretation. In: Sauerland U., Hans-Martin G. (eds) Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomskys minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics. Walterde Gruyter Gmbh, Berlin
Bhatt, R., & Yoon, J. (1991). On the composition of COMP and parameters of V2. In D. Bates (Ed.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. (Vol. 10, pp. 41–52).
Bierwisch M. (1989) The semantics of gradation. In: Bierwisch M., Lang E. (eds) Dimensional adjectives. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 71–261
Boër S. (1979) Meaning and contrastive stress. The Philosophical Review 2: 263–298
Bolinger D. (1968) Postposed main phrases: An English rule for the romance subjunctive. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 10: 125–197
Bolinger D. (1972) Degree words. De Hague, Mouton
Borgonovo C. et al (2003) Mood and focus. In: Quer J. (eds) Romance languages and linguistic theory 2001. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp 17–30
Büring, D. (1999). Drinking, accents, and negation. In E. Benedicto, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the focus workshop (pp. 37–50). University of Massachusetts Working Papers 21. Amherst, MA: GLSAPublications.
Cresswell M.J. (1976) The semantics of degree. In: Partee B.H. (eds) Montague grammar. Academic Press, New York, pp 261–292
Doetjes, J. (1997). Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Dretske F. (1972) Contrastive statements. Philosophical Review 81: 411–437
Dretske F. et al (1975) The content of knowledge. In: Freed B. (eds) Forms of representation. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 77–93
Erteschik-Shir N. (1997) The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Farkas D. (1985) Intensional descriptions and the romance subjunctive mood. Garland, New York
Farkas D. (1992) On the semantics of subjunctive complements. In: Hirschbuehler P., Koerner K. (eds) Romance languages and modern linguistic theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp 69–103
Farkas, D. (2003). Assertion, belief and mood choice. Ms., University of Santa Cruz.
Giannakidou, A. (1997). The landscape of polarity items. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
Giannakidou A. (1998) Polarity sensitivity as (Non) veridical dependency. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins
Giannakidou A. (1999) Affective dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 367–421
Giorgi A., Pianesi F. (1997) Tense and aspect, from semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Givón T. (1994) Irrealis and the subjunctive. Studies in Language 18(2): 265–337
Heim, I. (1985). Notes on comparatives and related matters. Ms., University of Texas, Austin.
Heim I. (1992) Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9: 183–221
Heim I. (2000) Degree operators and scope. In: Jackson B., Matthews T. (eds) Semantics and linguistic theory (Vol. 10). CLC Publication, Ithaca, NY, pp 40–64
Hintikka J. (1962) Knowledge and belief. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Hintikka J. et al (1969) Semantics for propositional attitudes. In: Davis J.W. (eds) Philosophical logic. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 21–45
Hooper J. (1975) On assertive predicates. In: Kimball J. (eds) Syntax and semantics Vol. 4. Academic Press, New York/London, pp 91–124
Jakobs J. (1983) Fokus und Skalen. Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag
Jakobs J (1991) Negation. In: Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds) Semantik/semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research. de Gruyter, Berlin
Kadmon N., Landman F. (1993) Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 353–422
Kamp H. (1975) Two theories of adjectives. In: Keenan E. (eds) Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 123–155
Katz, E. G. (1991). The downward entailingness of conditionals and adversatives. In FLSM II: Papers from the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica (pp. 217–243). Bloomington: IULC Publications.
Kempchinsky P. (1998) Mood phrase, case checking and obviation. In: Schwegler T., Uribe- Etxebarría M. (eds) Selected Proceedings of the 27th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 143–154
Kennedy C. (1999) Projecting the adjective. The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Garland, New York
Kennedy C. (2001) Polar Opposition and the ontology of ‘degrees’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 33–70
Kennedy C., McNally L. (2005) Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81(2): 1–37
Kiefer F. (1987) On defining modality. Folia Linguistica 21: 67–94
Klein E. (1980) A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 1–45
Klein E. (1991) Comparatives. In: Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds) Semantik/semantics. An international handbook of contemporary research. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 673–691
Krasikova, S. (2007). Universal modals in comparative clauses. In A. Grønn (Ed.), Proceedings of SUB12, Oslo.
Kratzer A. (1977) What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 337–355
Kratzer A. (1981) The notional category of modality. In: Eikmeyer H.-J., Rieser H. (eds) Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 38–74
Kratzer A. (1991) Modality. In: Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds) Semantik/semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 639–650
Krifka M. (1995) The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 25: 209–257
Lee, Y., & Horn, L. (1994). Any as indefinite plus Even. Manuscript, Yale University.
Lewis D. (1973) Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Lewis D. (1981) Ordering semantics and premise semantics for counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10: 317–234
Lewis D. (1986) Philosophical papers. (Vol. II). Oxford University Press, Oxford
Linebarger M. (1987) Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistic and Philosophy 10: 325–387
Panzeri, F. (2002). Mood and assertion. PhD dissertation, Universita degli Studi di Milano.
Panzeri, F. (2003). In the (indicative or subjunctive) mood. In M. Weisgerber (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference “sub7- Sinn und Bedeutung” (pp. 216–227). Arbeitspapier Nr. 114, FB Sprachwissenschaften. Germany: Universität Konstanz.
Partee B. (1991) Topic, focus and quantification. In: Moore S., Wyner A.Z. (eds) Proceedings of Semantic and Linguistic Theory I. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 159–189
Partee, B. (1993). On the ‘scope of negation’ and polarity sensitivity’. In E. Hajičová (Ed.), Functional description of language (pp. 179–196). Prague: Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University.
Portner, P. (1992). Situation theory and the semantics of propositional expressions. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Portner P. (1997) The semantics of mood, complementation, and conversational force. Natural Language Semantics 5: 167–212
Portner P. (1999) The semantics of mood. Glot International 4: 3–9
Portner P. (2003) The semantics of mood. In: Cheng L., Sybesman R. (eds) The second glot international state-of-the-article book. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 47–77
Portner P. (2004) The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In: Watanabe K., Young R. (eds) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Vol. 14). CLC Publications, Cornell University, Ithaca, NK
Portner P. (2007) Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics 15(4): 351–383
Quer, J. (1998). Mood at the interface. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Quer J. (2001) Interpreting mood. Probus 13: 81–111
Ridruejo E. (1999) Modo y Modalidad. In: Elmodoenlassubordinadassustantivas. Bosque I., Demonte V. (eds) Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Espasa, Madrid, pp 3207–3251
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Rooth M. (1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116
Rullmann, H. (1995). Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions. PhD. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Schlenker P. (2005) The lazy Frenchman’s approach to the subjunctive: Speculations on reference to worlds and semantic defaults in the analysis of mood. In: Geerts T., Gynneken I., Jakobs H. (eds) Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp 269–309
Seuren P. (1973) The comparative. In: Kiefer F., Ruwet N. (eds) Generative grammar in Europe. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 528–564
Sloman A. (1970) Ought and better. Mind 79: 385–394
Stalnaker, R. (1968). A theory of conditionals. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Studies in logical theory, American Philosophical Quarterly (pp. 98–112). Monograph: 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Stalnaker R. (1984) Inquiry. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Terrell T.D., Hooper J. (1974) A semantically based analysis of Mood in Spanish. Hispania 57: 484–494
von Fintel, K. (1994). Restrictions on quantifier domains. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
von Fintel K. (1999) NPI-licensing, Strawson-entailment, and context-dependency. Journal of Semantics 16: 97–148
von Fintel K., Iatridou S. (2007) Anatomy of modal construction. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 445–483
von Stechow A. (1984) Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77
von Stechow A. (1984) My reaction to Cresswell’s, Hellan’s, Hoeksema’s and Seuren’s comments. Journal of Semantics 3: 183–199
von Stechow, A. (2007). Times as degrees. MS. Tübingen.
von Wright G.H. (1963) Practical inference. The Philosophical Review 72: 159–179
Villalta, E. (2006). Context dependence in the interpretation of questions and subjunctives. PhD dissertation, Universität Tübingen.
Westerståhl, D. (1985). Determiners and context sets. In G. Van Benthem & A. Ter Meulen (Eds.), Generalized quantifiers in natural language (pp. 45–72).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Villalta, E. Mood and gradability: an investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish. Linguist and Philos 31, 467–522 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9046-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9046-x