Skip to main content
Log in

Cox regression analysis in presence of collinearity: an application to assessment of health risks associated with occupational radiation exposure

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the analysis of time to event data in the presence of collinearity between covariates. In linear and logistic regression models, the ridge regression estimator has been applied as an alternative to the maximum likelihood estimator in the presence of collinearity. The advantage of the ridge regression estimator over the usual maximum likelihood estimator is that the former often has a smaller total mean square error and is thus more precise. In this paper, we generalized this approach for addressing collinearity to the Cox proportional hazards model. Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of the ridge regression estimator. Our approach was motivated by an occupational radiation study conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory to evaluate health risks associated with occupational radiation exposure in which the exposure tends to be correlated with possible confounders such as years of exposure and attained age. We applied the proposed methods to this study to evaluate the association of radiation exposure with all-cause mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barker L and Brown C (2001). Logistic regression when binary predictor variables are highly correlated. Stat Med 20: 1431–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cardis E, Gilbert E and Carpenter L (1995). Effects of low doses and low dose rates of external ionizing radiation: cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in three countries. Radiat Res 142: 117–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, Gilbert E, Hakama M, Hill C, Howe G, Kaldor J, Muirhead CR, Schubauer-Berigan M., Yoshimura T., Bermann F, Cowper G, Fix J and Hacker C (2005). Risk of cancer after low doses of ionizing radiation–retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. Br Med J 331: 77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crivelli A, Firinguetti L, Montano R and Munoz M (1995). Confidence intervals in ridge regression by bootstrapping the dependent variable: a simulation study. Commun Statist Simula 24: 631–652

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox DR (1972). Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J Royal Stat Soc Series B 34: 187–220

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall

  7. Frome EL, Cragle DL, Watkins JP, Wing S, Shy CM, Tankersley WG and West CM (1997). A mortality study of employees of the nuclear industry in oak ridge, tennessee. Radiat Res 148: 64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibbons DG (1981). A simulation study of some ridge estimators. J Am Stat Assoc 76: 131–139

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilbert ES (1989). Issues in analyzing the effects of occupational exposure to low levels of radiation. Stat Med 8: 173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert ES, Omohundro E, Buchanan J and Holter N (1993a). Mortality of workers at the hanford site: 1945-1986. Health Phy 64: 577–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilbert ES, Cragle D and Wiggs L (1993b). Updated analyses of combined mortality data for workers at the hanford site, oak ridge national laboratory, and rocky flats weapons plant. Radiat Res 136: 408–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang J and Harrington D (2002). Penalized partial likelihood regression for right censored data with bootstrap selection of the penalty parameter. Biometrics 58: 781–791

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoerl AE and Kennard RW (1970a). Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12: 55–67

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoerl AE and Kennard RW (1970b). Ridge regression: some simulations. Commun Stat 4(2): 1105–1123

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holford TR, Zheng T, Mayne S, Zahm SH, Tessari JD and Boyle P (2000). Joint effects of nine polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners on breast cancer risk. Int J Epidemiol 29: 975–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lagakos SW (1988). Effects of mismodelling and mismeasuring explanatory variables on tests of their association with a response variable. Stat Med 7: 257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lustbader ED (1986). Relative risk regression diagnosis. In: Moolgavkar, SH and Prentice, RL (eds) Modern statistical methods in chronic disease epidemiology, pp. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marsh JL, Hutton JL and Binks K (2002). Removal of radiation dose response effects: an example of over-matching. Brit. Med. J 325: 327–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schafer RL, Roi LD and Wolfe RA (1984). A ridge logistic estimator. Commun Stat Theory Methods 13(1): 99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith KR, Slattery ML and French TK (1991). Collinear nutrients and the risk of colon cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 44: 715–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shore RE (1990). Occupational radiation studies: status, problems and prospects. Health Phys 59: 63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tibshirani R (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J Royal Stat Soc Series B 58: 267–288

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Tibshirani R (1997). The lasso method for variable selection in the cox model. Stat Med 16: 385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Houwelingen JC (2001). Shrinkage and penalized likelihood as methods to improve predictive accuracy. Stat Neerlandica 55: 17–34

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Verweij PJM and van Houwelingen HC (1994). Penalized likelihood in cox regression. Stat Med 13: 2427–2436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Verweij PJM and van Houwelingen HC (1993). Cross-validation in survival analysis. Stat Med 12: 2305–2314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wing S, Shy CM, Wood JL, Wolf S, Cragle DL and Frome EL (1991). Mortality among workers at oak ridge national laboratory, evidence of radiation effects in follow-up through 1984. J Am Med Assoc 265: 1397–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wing S, Shy CM, Wood JL, Wolf S, Cragle DL, Tankersley W and Frome EL (1993). Job factors, radiation and cancer mortality at oak ridge national laboratory: follow up through 1984. Am J Indust Med 23: 265–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wing S and Richardson DB (1999). Greater sensitivity to ionizing radiation at older age: follow-up of workers at oak ridge national laboratory through 1990. Int J Epidemiol 28: 428–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xue X, Shore RE, Ye X and Kim MY (2004). Estimating the dose response relationship for occupational radiation exposure measured with minimum detection level. Health Phys 87: 397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaonan Xue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xue, X., Kim, M.Y. & Shore, R.E. Cox regression analysis in presence of collinearity: an application to assessment of health risks associated with occupational radiation exposure. Lifetime Data Anal 13, 333–350 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-007-9045-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-007-9045-1

Keywords

Navigation