Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Finnish children’s views on the ideal school and learning environment

  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This grounded-theory study involved how Finnish children describe their ideal school and learning environment and considers how their notions should be valued in the development of schools to better respond to the challenges of the future. The school children, aged 10–12 years, participated in the study by writing a story about a school in which they would be happy to study. Ninety-three children’s stories were coded and analysed, and a model of the ideal school and learning environment based on their ideas was developed. This model school, called a Broadening and Empowering Learning Environment, is designed to contribute to children’s physical, educational, cultural and socio-emotional well-being, offers opportunities for fantasy and innovation, and employs creative and sports-based learning methods, among others, in both formal and informal settings. The study showed that children, as educational stakeholders, are well aware of the potential of modern schools and of the different aspects that would enhance their ability to learn and their satisfaction with schooling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aittola, T. (2000). Possibilities of informal learning inside and outside the school. In P. Alheit, J. Beck, E. Kammler, R. Taylor, & S. Olesen (Eds.), Lifelong learning inside and outside schools (Collected papers of the European Conference on Lifelong Learning, Bremen, Germany, February 25–27, 1999). Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University.

  • Anderman, E. (2002). School effects on psychological outcomes during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 795–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Lucas, K., & Ginns, I. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, D., & Wells, G. (2006). Dialogic inquiry in classroom and museum: Actions, tools, and talk. In Z. Bekerman, N. Burbules, & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 35–54). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awartani, M., Whitman, C., & Gordon, J. (2008). Developing instruments to capture young people’s perceptions of how school as a learning environment affects their well-being. European Journal of Education, 43(1), 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekerman, Z., Burbules, N., & Silberman-Keller, D. (2006). Introduction. In Z. Bekerman, N. Burbules, & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 1–8). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokulich, A. (2001). Rethinking thought experiments. Perspectives on Science, 9(3), 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C. (2007). The view of the child: Releasing ‘visual voices’ in the design of learning environment. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caillois, R. (2001). Man, play and games. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, G. (2002). Education for the learning age: A sociocultural approach to learning to learn. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 21–33). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, G. (2007). Expanding young people’s capacity to learn. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2), 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, G., & Carr, M. (2004). A framework for teaching thinking: The dynamics of disposition. Early Years, 24(1), 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (2004). Creativity in education & learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. A., Mufti, I., Amagi, I., Carneiro, R., Chung, F., Geremek, B., et al. (1996). Learning: The treasure within (Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century). Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved October 12, 2008, from http://www.unesco.org/delors.

  • Dewey, J. (1957). Koulu ja yhteiskunta [The school and society]. Helsinki, Finland: Otava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. (2008). Identifying students’ perceptions of the important classroom features affecting learning aspects of a design-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 11, 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, M., Zins, J., Weissberg, K., Greenberg, M., Haynes, N., Kessler, R., et al. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guideliness for educators. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 211–224). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flutter, J. (2006). ‘This place could help you learn’: Student participation in creating better school environments. Educational Review, 58(2), 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, A. C., Reinhard, P., & Goetz, T. (2007). Perceived learning environment and students’ emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17, 478–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Greeno, J. (2006). Identity and agency in nonschool and school worlds. In Z. Bekerman, N. Burbules, & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 77–97). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyvönen, P. (2008). Affordances of playful learning environment for tutoring playing and learning (Doctoral dissertation. Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 152. University of Lapland, Faculty of Education, Finland). Rovaniemi, Finland: University of Lapland Printing Centre.

  • Hyvönen, P., Kangas, M., Kultima, A., & Latva, S. (2006). Let’s play! Tutkimuksia leikillisestä oppimisympäristöstä (Lapin yliopiston kasvatustieteellisiä julkaisuja 16) [Let’s Play! Studies of playful learning environments (Educational publications 16. University of Lapland)]. Rovaniemi, Finland: University of Lapland Printing Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling society. Middlesex, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., Christie, J., & Wardle, F. (2005). Play, development and early education. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangas, M., Hyvönen, P., & Latva, S. (2007). The Space Treasure outdoor game in the playful learning environment: Experiences and assessment. In H. Ruokamo, M. Kangas, M. Lehtonen, & K. Kumpulainen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International NBE 2007 Conference: The power of media in education (pp. 181–194). Rovaniemi, Finland: University of Lapland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershner, R., & Pointon, P. (2000). Children’s views of the primary classroom as an environment for working and learning. Research in Education, 64, 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Könings, K., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merrienboer, J. (2005). Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 645–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konu, A. I., Lintonen, T. P., & Rimpelä, M. K. (2002). Factors associated with schoolchildren’s general subjective well-being. Health Education Research, 17, 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. W. (2006). Informal learning: Conceptual distinctions and preliminary findings. In Z. Bekerman, N. Burbules, & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 203–227). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahn, H., & John-Steiner, V. (2002). The gift of confidence: A Vygotskian view of emotions. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 46–58). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malin, A. (2006). School differences and inequities in educational outcomes (PISA2000 results of reading literacy in Finland). Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylä University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, D. (2008). Balancing power in communities of practice: An examination of increasing student voice through school-based youth-adult partnership. Journal of Educational Change, 9(3), 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Board of Education. (2004). Finnish National Core Curriculum. Helsinki, Finland: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cambridge, UK: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006). Programme for International Sudent Assessment (PISA). Retrieved March, 9, 2008, from http://www.pisa.oecd.org.

  • OECD. (2007). Understanding the brain: The birth of learning science. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piispanen, M. (2008). Good learning environment: Perceptions of good quality in comprehensive school by pupils, parents and teachers. Unpublished doctoral thesis in Pedagogics, University of Jyväskylä, Finland; Faculty of Pedagogics, Kokkola University Consortium Chydenius, Finland.

  • Randolph, J., Kangas, M., & Ruokamo, H. (2010). Predictors of Dutch and Finnish students’ satisfaction with schooling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rantala, T. (2005). Oppimisen iloa etsimässä—Kokemuksen etnografiaa alkuopetuksessa [Seeking the joy of learning—the ethnography of experience in elementary instruction] (Doctoral dissertation. Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 88. University of Lapland, Faculty of Education, Finland). Rovaniemi, Finland: University of Lapland Printing Centre.

  • Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgers, N., Stratton, G., Fairclough, S., & Twisk, J. (2007). Long-term effects of a playground markings and physical structures on children’s recess physical activity levels. Preventive Medicine, 44, 393–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, M. (2000). Learning environments research, lifeworld analysis, and solidarity in practice. Learning Environments Research, 2, 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (2004a). From learning lessons to living knowledge. Instructional discourse and life experiences of youth in complex society. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont, C. Pontecorvo, L. Resnick, T. Zittoun, & B. Burge (Eds.), Joining society: Social interaction and learning in adolescence and youth (pp. 177–191). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (2004b). Learning and technologies, people and tools in co-ordinated activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 489–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (2005). Lärande i praktiken: ett sociokulturellt perspektiv [Learning in practice: Sociocultural perspective]. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samdal, O., Nutbeam, B., Wold, B., & Kannas, L. (1998). Achieving health and educational goals though schools—A study of importance of school climate and the students’ satisfaction with school. Health Education Research: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schugurensky, D. (2006). “This is our school of citizenship”. Informal learning in local democracy. In Z. Bekerman, N. Burbules, & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 163–182). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smees, R., & Thomas, S. (1998). Valuing pupils’ views about school. British Journal of Curriculum & Assessment, 8(3), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Parr, M. (2007). Young people’s views on the nature and purposes of physical education: A sociological analysis. Sport, Education & Society, 12(1), 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park; CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S., Smees, R., MacBeath, J., Robertson, P., & Boyd, B. (2000). Valuing pupils’ views in Scottish schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(4), 281–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Välijärvi, J., & Sahlberg, P. (2008). Should ‘failing’ students repeat a grade? Retrospective response from Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyten, M., & Thijs, J. (2002). School satisfaction of elementary school children: The role of performance, peer relations, ethnicity and gender. Social Indications Research, 59, 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitikka, E. (2008, March). The Finnish Curriculum Model of Basic Education—The form of content and pedagogy in curriculum design. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, M., Warburton, P., & Coy, M. (2007). Observation of children’s physical activity levels in primary school: Is the school an ideal setting for meeting government activity targets? European Physical Education Review, 13(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G., & Claxton, G. (2002). Introduction. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 1–17). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was a part of the author’s dissertation, and was supported by the Finnish Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES) and by Finnish municipalities and company partners (http://InnoSchool.tkk.fi). The study was also supported by Doctoral Programme for Multidiciplinary Research on Learning Environments (http://edu.utu/tutkijakoulut/opmon/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Media Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, University of Lapland, P.O. Box 122, 96101, Rovaniemi, Finland

    Marjaana Kangas

Authors
  1. Marjaana Kangas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjaana Kangas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kangas, M. Finnish children’s views on the ideal school and learning environment. Learning Environ Res 13, 205–223 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9075-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9075-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation