Abstract
During the last decades, traditional learning environments have been criticised for not developing the prerequisites for professional expertise (H. Mandl, H. Gruber & A. Renkl, Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition, pp. 394–412, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996; P. Tynjälä, International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 357–442, 1999). To meet this criticism, educational approaches such as problem-based learning, project-based learning and case-based learning are being implemented to an increasing extent. Research also concentrates on the efficiency of these approaches in terms of students’ learning outcomes. At the same time, classroom-based theories of learning (J. B. Biggs, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3–19, 1993; M. Prosser & K. Trigwell, Understanding learning and teaching. Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press, 1999) stress the importance of the investigation of subjective learning environments in order to understand the nature of these students’ learning outcomes, for learning results are not a mere function of the learning setting because each student operates as a filter for the possible influence of the environment. However, most research on students’ perception of the learning environment is conducted in predominantly traditional learning environments.
The goal of our research was to investigate students’ perceptions of the key design variables of a problem-based learning environment and if students perceive that they enhance learning. There are four research questions. First, to what extent do students’ perceptions of a PBL environment match the theoretical assumptions of PBL? Second, do their perceptions differ as a function of the institutional context? Third, is there a difference in the perceptions of students between groups of first year and experienced students and between disciplines? Fourth, are there interaction effects between study phase and discipline?
The results show that, in general, students value the key variables of the learning environment as powerful (i.e. enhancing learning). Also, the results indicate that students’ perceptions of the learning environment in various institutional contexts differ significantly. In general, no distinctions were found related to students in different study phases. However, in terms of specific design variables, students studying in diverse disciplines showed significantly divergent perceptions. Finally, significant interaction effects were found between study phase and discipline.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albanese, M., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of the literature on its outcomes and implementations issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52–81.
Allan, J. (1996). Learning outcomes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 93–108.
Anderson, L. M. (1989). Classroom instruction. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 101–115). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Baarda, D. B., & de Goede, M. P. M. (1997). Basisboek methoden en technieken [Manual on methods and technics]. Leiden, The Netherlands: Stenfert Kroese.
Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research in Higher Education/Open University Press.
Barrows, H., & Tamblyn, R. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486.
Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 266–279.
Boud, D. (1987). Problem-based learning in perspective. In D. Boud (Ed.), Problem-based learning in education for the profession (pp. 3–18). Sydney, Australia: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia.
Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page.
Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1997). Changing problem-based learning. In D. Boud & G. Feletti (Eds.), The challenge of problem-based learning (pp. 1–14). London: Kogan Page.
Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning. London: Kogan Page.
Charlin, B., Mann, K., & Hansen, P. (1998). The many faces of problem-based learning: A framework for understanding and comparison. Medical Teacher, 20, 323–330.
Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction, 4, 331–345.
De Corte, E. (1990). Towards powerful learning environments for the acquisition of problem-solving skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 5(1), 5– 19.
De Corte, E. (1996). Actief leren binnen krachtige onderwijsleeromgevingen [Active learning in a powerful learning environment]. Impuls, 26(4), 145–156.
De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: A permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249–266.
Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1997). Assessment as a major influence on learning and instruction. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 415–432.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69, 145–186.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 512–533.
Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1992). Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.
Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. Review of Research in Education, 5, 163–197.
Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169–194.
Gijselaers, W. (1995). Perspectives on problem-based learning. In W. Gijselaers, D. Tempelaar, P. Keizer, J. Blommaert, E. Bernard, & H. Kasper (Eds.), Educational innovation in economics and business administration: The case of problem-based learning (pp. 39–51). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Gijselaers, W. H. (1988). Kwaliteit van het onderwijs gemeten: Studies naar de betrouwbaarheid, validiteit en bruikbaarheid van studentoordelen [Measuring the quality of the educational system: Studies on reliability, validity and utility of student judgements]. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Limburg.
Gijselaers, W. H., & Schmidt, H. G. (1990). The development and evaluation of a causal model of problem-based learning. In Z. Norman, H. G. Schmidt, & E. Ezzat (Eds.), Innovation in medical education: An evaluation of its present status (pp. 95–113). New York: Springer.
Gregen, K. J. (1995). Social construction and the educational process. In P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 17–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Harvey, L. (1993, December). Employer satisfaction: Interim report. Paper presented at the Quality in Higher Education 24-hour Seminar, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Harvey, L., Burrows, A., & Green, D. (1993). Someone who can make an impression: Report of the QHE employers’ survey of qualities of higher education graduates. In L. Harvey (Ed.), Quality assessment in higher education: Collected papers of The QHE Project (pp. 123–145) Birmingham, UK: University Press.
Jackson, M. J., & Prosser, M. (1989). Less lecturing, more learning. Studies in Higher Education, 14, 55–68.
Kwan, C. Y. (2000). What is problem-based learning? It is magic, myth and mindset. Centre for Development of Teaching and Learning, CDTL Brief, 3(3), 1–4.
Laurillard, D. (1997). Styles and approaches in problem solving. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 126–144). Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic Press.
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52.
Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl, A. (1996). Communities of practice toward expertise: Social foundation of university instruction. In P. B. Baltes & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 394–412). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
O’Hanlon, A., Winefield, H., Hejka, E., & Chur-Hansen, A. (1995). Initial responses of first-year medical students to problem-based learning in a behavioural science course: A role of language background and course content. Medical Education, 29, 198– 204.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Pereira, L. M. P., Telang, B. V., & Butler, K. A. (1993). Preliminary evaluation of a new curriculum–-Incorporation of problem-based learning into the traditional format. Medical Teacher, 15, 351–364.
Prawat, R. S. (1996). Constructivism modern and postmodern. Educational Psychologist, 31, 215–225.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.
Sambell, K., & McDowell, L. (1998). The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 391–402.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Segers, M. S. R. (1996). Assessment in a problem-based economics curriculum. In M. Birenbaum & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 201–224). Boston: Kluwer.
Segers, M., Dochy, F., & Cascallar, E. (2003). Optimising new modes of assessment. Boston: Kluwer.
Segers, M., Dochy, F., & De Corte, E. (1999). Assessment practices and students’ knowledge profiles in a problem-based curriculum. Learning Environments Research, 2, 191–213.
Sim Heng Chye, M., Wee Keng Neo, L., & Da Silva, G. (2000, June). Student evaluation of the subject under problem-based learning mode: The case of practice of entrepreneurship. Paper presented at the Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Problem-Based Learning, Singapore.
Snyder, B. R. (1971). The hidden curriculum. New York: Knopf.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1995). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advance knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 85–108). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2003). Students’ perceptions about new modes of assessment: A review. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 171–223). Boston: Kluwer.
Thorn, P. M., Vigilante, A. L., & Silverthorn, D. U. (2002). Active learning through students’ eyes: Teaching interventions for overcoming student resistance. FASEB Journal, 16(5), 34–57.
Thorndike, R. L. (1988). Reliability. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 330–343). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Trigwell, K., Hazel, E., & Prosser, M. (1996). Perceptions of the learning environment and approaches to learning university science at the topic level. In Different approaches: Theory and practice in higher education. Proceedings, HERDSA Conference 1996, Perth, Western Australia, 8–12 July. Available from http://www.herdsa.org.au/confs/1996/trigwell2.html
Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 357–442.
Van den Bossche, P., Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2000, June). Does problem-based learning educate problem-solvers? A meta-analysis on the effects of problem-based learning. Paper presented at the Seventh Edineb Conference, Newport Beach, CA.
Van den Bossche, P., Segers, M., Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2001, June). Effects of problem-based learning in Business Administration: A comparison between a PBL approach and a conventional educational approach. Paper presented at the 8th Edineb International Conference, Nice, France.
Woods, D. R. (1994). Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster University, The Bookstore.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Bossche, P.V.D. et al. Students’ Perceptions of a Problem-Based Learning Environment. Learning Environ Res 8, 41–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-7948-x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-7948-x