Abstract
Context
Predicting and managing edge effects requires an understanding of the mechanisms that drive them. However, analytical methods that dominate edge effects research are not well suited to discriminating mechanisms, because they do not measure ‘indirect’ edge effects: effects that are mediated by covariates in statistical models.
Objective
To discuss the value of indirect effects for improving mechanistic understanding of edge effects.
Methods
We explain how measuring indirect effects improves mechanistic understanding, and provide guidance on how to do so. We also conduct a literature review to examine awareness of indirect effects in empirical studies of mechanisms underpinning edge effects. Finally, we use a recent paper in Villaseñor et al. (Landscape Ecol 30:229–245, 2015) as a case study to discuss how failure to measure indirect edge effects may limit mechanistic understanding.
Results
Indirect effects provide a means to translate conceptual models of edge effects into mechanistic pathways that are testable and quantifiable. Moreover, failure to measure indirect edge effects can result in impacts of habitat edges being underestimated. However, few studies that we identified in our literature review quantified indirect effects (7 %, n = 72). Worryingly, 11 % of studies did not account for indirect effects despite using statistical models that potentially contained them, possibly resulting in incorrect inference.
Conclusions
A better awareness of indirect effects will help researchers to understand the mechanisms that underpin edge effects, while ensuring that impacts of habitat edges are not underestimated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbuckle J (2011) IBM SPSS amos 20 user’s guide. IBM Corporation, Armonk
Campbell RE, Harding JS, Ewers RM, Thorpe S, Didham RK (2011) Production land use alters edge response functions in remnant forest invertebrate communities. Ecol Appl 21(8):3147–3161
Cottam MR, Robinson SK, Heske EJ, Brawn JD, Rowe KC (2009) Use of landscape metrics to predict avian nest survival in a fragmented midwestern forest landscape. Biol Conserv 142(11):2464–2475
Cox WA, Thompson FR III, Faaborg J (2012) Landscape forest cover and edge effects on songbird nest predation vary by nest predator. Landscape Ecol 27(5):659–669
Didham RK, Kapos V, Ewers RM (2012) Rethinking the conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research. Oikos 121(2):161–170
Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81(1):117–142
Ewers RM, Didham RK (2008) Pervasive impact of large-scale edge effects on a beetle community. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(14):5426–5429
Ewers RM, Marsh CJ, Wearn OR (2010) Making statistics biologically relevant in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 25(12):699–704
Feeley KJ, Terborgh JW (2008) Direct versus indirect effects of habitat reduction on the loss of avian species from tropical forest fragments. Anim Conserv 11(5):353–360
Githiru M, Lens L, Cresswell W (2005) Nest predation in a fragmented Afrotropical forest: evidence from natural and artificial nests. Biol Conserv 123(2):189–196
Grace J (2006) Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Grace J (2008) Structural equation modelling for observational studies. J Wildl Manag 72(1):14–22
Lahti D (2001) The “edge effect on nest predation” hypothesis after 20 years. Biol Conserv 99(3):365–374
Le Tortorec E, Helle S, Käyhkö N, Suorsa P, Huhta E, Hakkarainen H (2013) Habitat fragmentation and reproductive success: a structural equation modelling approach. J Anim Ecol 82(5):1087–1097
Lt Hu, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6(1):1–55
Mairota P, Cafarelli B, Labadessa R, Lovergine FP, Tarantino C, Nagendra H, Didham RK (2015) Very high resolution earth observation features for testing the direct and indirect effects of landscape structure on local habitat quality. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 34:96–102
Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10(2):58–62
Ries L, Fletcher RJ Jr, Battin J, Sisk TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:491–522
Ries L, Sisk TD (2004) A predictive model of edge effects. Ecology 85(11):2917–2926
Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: an R package for structural equation modelling. J Stat Softw 48(2):1–36
Ruffell J, Banks-Leite C, Didham RK (2016) Accounting for the causal basis of collinearity when measuring the effects of habitat loss versus fragmentation. Oikos 25(1):117–125
Ruffell J, Didham RK, Barrett P, Gorman N, Pike R, Hickey-Elliott A, Armstrong DP (2014) Discriminating the drivers of edge effects on nest predation: forest edges reduce capture rates of ship rats (Rattus rattus), a globally invasive nest predator, by altering vegetation structure. PLoS One 9(11):e113098
Shipley B (2002) Cause and correlation in biology: a user’s guide to path analysis, structural equations and causal inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Shipley B (2009) Confirmatory path analysis in a generalized multilevel context. Ecology 90(2):363–368
Tomarken A, Waller N (2003) Potential problems with “well fitting” models. J Abnorm Psychol 112(4):578–598
Tomarken A, Waller N (2005) Structural equation modelling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 1:31–65
Villaseñor NR, Blanchard W, Driscoll DA, Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB (2015) Strong influence of local habitat structure on mammals reveals mismatch with edge effects models. Landscape Ecol 30(2):229–245
Wimp GM, Murphy SM, Lewis D, Ries L (2011) Do edge responses cascade up or down a multi-trophic food web? Ecol Lett 14(9):863–870
Young A, Mitchell N (1994) Microclimate and vegetation edge effects in a fragmented podocard-broadleaf forest in New Zealand. Biol Conserv 67(1):63–72
Acknowledgments
RKD was funded by ARC Future Fellowship FT100100040 during manuscript preparation. We thank Leslie Ries and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments that improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruffell, J., Didham, R.K. Towards a better mechanistic understanding of edge effects. Landscape Ecol 31, 2205–2213 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0397-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0397-3