Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Predictive spatial niche and biodiversity hotspot models for small mammal communities in Alaska: applying machine-learning to conservation planning

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Changing global environmental conditions, especially at northern latitudes, are threatening to shift species distributions and alter wildlife communities.

Objective

We aimed to establish current distributions and community arrangements of small mammals to provide important baselines for monitoring and conserving biodiversity into the future.

Methods

We used 4,408 archived museum and open-access records and the machine learning algorithm, RandomForests, to create high-resolution spatial niche models for 17 species of rodents and shrews in Alaska. Models were validated using independent trapping results from 20 locations stratified along statewide mega-transects, and an average species richness curve was calculated for field samples. Community cluster analyses (varclus) identified geographic patterns of sympatry among species. Species models were summed to create the first small-mammal species richness map for Alaska.

Results

Species richness increased logarithmically to a mean of 3.3 species per location over 1,500 trap-nights. Distribution models yielded mean accuracies of 71 % (45–90 %), and maps correctly predicted a mean of 75 % (60–95 %) of occurrences correctly in the field. Top predictors included Soil Type, Ecoregion, Landfire Land-cover, December Sea Ice, and July Temperature at the geographic scale. Cluster analysis delineated five community groups (3–4 species/group), and species richness was highest (11–13 species) over the Yukon-Tanana Uplands.

Conclusions

Models presented here provide spatial predictions of current small mammal biodiversity in Alaska and an initial framework for mapping and monitoring wildlife distributions across broad landscapes into the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarssen LW (1997) High productivity in grassland ecosystems: affected by species diversity or productive species? Oikos 80:183–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (2005) Impacts of a warming Arctic. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA), Cambridge

  • Assogbadjo A, Sinsin B, Codjia J, Damme PV (2005) Ecological diversity and pulp, seed, and kernel production of the Baobab (Adansonia digitata) in Benin. Belg J Bot 138:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltensperger AP, Mullet TC, Schmid MS, Humphries G, Kövér L, Huettmann F (2013) Seasonal observations and machine-learning-based spatial model predictions for the common raven (Corvus corax) in the urban, sub-arctic environment of Fairbanks, Alaska. J Polar Biol 36:1587–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booms TL, Huettmann F, Schempf PF (2010) Gyrfalcon nest distribution in Alaska based on a predictive GIS model. Polar Biol 33:347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001a) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001b) Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Stat Sci 16:199–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckner CH (1964) Feeding behavior in four species of shrews. Can J Zool 42:259–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham K, Anderson D (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York, p 488

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush MB (2002) Distributional change and conservation on the Andean flank: a palaeoecological perspective. Clim Change Conserv Spec Issue 11:463–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Carleton MD, Gardner AL, Pavlinov IY, Musser GG (2014) The valid generic name for red-backed voles (Muroidea: Cricetidae: Arvicolinae): restatement of the case for Myodes Pallas, 1811. J Mammal 95:943–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchfield S, Nesterenko VA, Shvarts EA (1999) Food niche overlap and ecological separation amongst six species of coexisting forest shrews (Insectivore: Soricidae) in the Russian Far East. J Zool 248:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measur 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA (2010) Space and time in ecology: noise or fundamental driver? In: Cushman SA, Huettmann F (eds) Spatial complexity, informatics, and wildlife conservation. Springer, New York, p 24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DR, Edwards KH Jr, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De’ath G, Fabricius KE (2000) Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178–3192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew CA, Wiersma YF, Huettmann F (2011) Predictive species and habitat modeling in landscape ecology. Springer, Berlin, p 314

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Cardinale BJ, France KE, McIntyre PB, Thébault E, Loreau M (2007) The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecol Lett 10:522–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Leathwick J (2007) Predicting species distributions from museum and herbarium records using multi-response models fitted with multivariate adaptive regression splines. Divers Distrib 13:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JS, Murphy MA, Holden ZA, Cushman SA (2011) Modeling species distribution and change using Random Forest. In: Drew CA, Wiersma YF, Huettmann F (eds) Predictive species and habitat modeling in landscape ecology. Springer, Berlin, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 234:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritts E, Burch M, Rabe M, Schwarber J, McCracken B (2006) Our wealth maintained: a strategy for conserving Alaska’s diverse wildlife and fish resources. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Juneau, AK, p 852

  • Gilg O, Sittler B, Hanski I (2009) Climate change and cyclic predator–prey population dynamics in the high Arctic. Glob Change Biol 15:2634–2652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotthardt T, Pyare S, Huettmann F et al (2013) Predicting the range and distribution of terrestrial vertebrate species in Alaska. The Alaska Gap Analysis Project, University of Alaska, Anchorage, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough L, Ramsey EA, Johnson DR (2007) Plant-herbivore interactions in Alaskan arctic tundra change with soil nutrient availability. Oikos 116:407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett J, O’Connell M, Maguire C (2003) Ecological relationships of terrestrial small mammals in western coniferous forests. In: Zabel CJ, Anthony RG (eds) Mammal community dynamics: management and conservation in the coniferous forests of western North America. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy SM, Lindgren M, Konakanchi H, Huettmann F (2011) Predicting the distribution and ecological niche of unexploited snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) populations in Alaskan waters: a first open-access ensemble model. Integr Comp Biol 51:608–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2001) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer, New York, p 763

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ et al (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope AG, Waltari E, Dokuchaev NE et al (2010) High-latitude diversification within Eurasian least shrews and Alaska tiny shrews (Soricidae). J Mammal 91:1041–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope AG, Waltari E, Payer DC, Cook JA, Talbot SL (2013) Future distribution of tundra refugia in northern Alaska. Nat Clim Change 3:931–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huettmann F, Gottschalk T (2010) Simplicity, model fit, complexity and uncertainty in spatial prediction models applied over time: we are quite sure, aren’t we? In: Drew CA, Wiersma YF, Huettmann F (eds) Predictive species and habitat modeling in landscape ecology. Springer, Berlin, p 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbour Symp Quant Biol 22:415–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 52

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CJ, Seip DR, Boyce MS (2004) A quantitative approach to conservation planning: using resource selection functions to map the distribution of mountain caribou at multiple spatial scales. J Appl Ecol 41:238–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelling S, Hochachka WM, Fink D et al (2009) Data-intensive science: a new paradigm for biodiversity studies. Prof Biol 59:613–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JT, Kulkarni M, Algar A (2011) Integrating theory and predictive modeling for conservation research. In: Drew CA, Wiersma YF, Huettmann F (eds) Predictive species and habitat modeling in landscape ecology. Springer, New York, p 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis JR, Koch G (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler JJ, White D, Master LL (2003) Integrating representation and vulnerability: two approaches for prioritizing areas for conservation. Ecol Appl 13:1762–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler JJ, Shafer SL, White D et al (2009) Projected climate-induced faunal change in the Western Hemisphere. Ecology 90:588–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Heap AD, Potte A, Daniell JJ (2011) Application of machine learning methods to spatial interpolation of environmental variables. Environ Model Softw 26:1647–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy TE, Hannah L (2005) Climate change and biodiversity. Yale University Press, New Haven, p 440

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald SO, Cook JA (2009) Recent mammals of Alaska. University of Alaska Press, Fairbanks, p 387

    Google Scholar 

  • Magness DR, Huettmann F, Morton JM (2008) Using Random Forests to provide predicted species distribution maps as a metric for ecological inventory and monitoring. In: Smolinski TG, Milanova MG, Hassanien A-E (eds) Applications of computational intelligence in biology: studies in computational intelligence. Springer, New York, p 229

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina B (2001) Glaciers of Alaska. Alaska Geographic, 2. Alaska Geographic Society, Anchorage, p 128

  • Murphy K, Huettmann F, Fresco N, Morton J (2010) Connecting Alaska landscapes into the future: results from an interagency climate modeling, land management and conservation project. Fairbanks, p 100

  • Neilson RP (1991) Climatic contraints and issues of scale controlling regional biomes. Ecotones 1:31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1979) Population ecology of raptors. A&C Black Publishers Ltd, London, p 273

  • Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Soc Conserv Biol 4:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohse B, Huettmann F, Ickert-Bond SM, Juday GP (2009) Modeling the distribution of white spruce (Picea glauca) for Alaska with high accuracy: an open access role-model for predicting tree species in last remaining wilderness areas. Polar Biol 32:1717–1729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson J, Tommervik H, Callaghan TV (2012) Vole and lemming activity observed from space. Nat Clim Change 2:880–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 42:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Liaw A (2006) Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9:181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prost S, Guralnick RP, Waltari E et al (2013) Losing ground: past history and future fate of Arctic small mammals in a changing climate. Glob Change Biol 19:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root T, MacMynowski D, Mastrandrea M, Schneider S (2005) Human-modified temperatures induce species changes: joint attribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7465–7469

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/

  • VanDerWal J, Shoo LP, Graham C, Williams SE (2009) Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: how far should you stray from what you know? Ecol Model 220:589–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viereck LA, Dyrness CT, Batten AR, Wenzlick KJ (1992) The Alaska vegetation classification. PNW-GTR-286. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, p 278

  • Wang J, Lin G, Huang J, Han X (2004) Applications of stable isotopes to study plant–animal relationships in terrestrial ecosystems. Chin Sci Bull 49:2239–2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma YF, Huettmann F, Drew CA (2011) Landscape modeling of species and their habitats: history, uncertainty, and complexity. In: Drew CA, Wiersma YF, Huettmann F (eds) Predictive species and habitat modeling in landscape ecology. Springer, New York, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JW, Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front Ecol Environ 5:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (2006) The creation: an appeal to save life on earth. W.W. Norton & Company Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39(4):561–577

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are deeply indebted to everyone who assisted AB in the field, especially David Keiter, Edward Corp, Jessica Jordan, Alex Nicely, Casey Brown, Tim Mullet, László Kövér, and Dmitry Korobitsyn for their tireless efforts on the trap-lines. Thank you also to Link Olson, Stephen MacDonald, Joseph Cook, and GBIF for compiling and contributing valuable occurrence datasets and lending traps and equipment. Logistical support, field gear, and transportation were also generously provided by David Payer, Mark Bertram, Tom Paragi, Dashiel Feierabend, Joshua Jerome, Chris Long, Jeff Melegari, Jeremy Carlson, the Russian Mission Village Council and Kako Retreat Center. Finally, thank you to everyone who so generously offered help, advice, and fish along the Yukon River.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775, USA

    Andrew P. Baltensperger & Falk Huettmann

Authors
  1. Andrew P. Baltensperger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Falk Huettmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew P. Baltensperger.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baltensperger, A.P., Huettmann, F. Predictive spatial niche and biodiversity hotspot models for small mammal communities in Alaska: applying machine-learning to conservation planning. Landscape Ecol 30, 681–697 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0150-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0150-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation