Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A method to identify the variable ecosystem services relationship across time: a case study on Yanhe Basin, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecosystem services are increasingly recognized as the foundations of a well-functioning society. Large-scale ecological restoration projects have been implemented around China with the goal of restoring and sustaining ecosystem services, especially in vulnerable semi-arid regions where soil and water resources are most stressed due to historic human activities. The relationships among ecosystem services are often driven by land-use changes. It is necessary to develop an applicable method to explore the relationships between ecosystem services and driving factors over time. We selected the Yanhe Basin on China’s Loess Plateau as the study area, which has experienced a large-scale Grain for Green Project (GGP), and quantified four ecosystem services (soil conservation, water retention, water yield, and crop production). The results of this study show that different trends have occurred for ecosystem services during 2000–2008. We found potential tradeoffs between soil conservation and water yield. Synergies may exist among water retention and soil conservation/water yield. Two types of preconditions were pointed out in the analysis process to define the potential relationships among ecosystem service variables. The correspondence analysis was used to explore its intrinsic linkage and its variations among ecosystem services, land uses, and spatial locations. It suggests that the intensities of the ecosystem services provided by most of land uses and the internal proportion of regulating service to provision service in a sub-basin has been changed by GGP, but the relative spatial patterns of ecosystem services are still being maintained in entire basin scale from 1980 to 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan BA (2013) Incentives, land use, and ecosystem services: synthesizing complex linkages. Environ Sci Policy 27:124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budyko MI (1974) Climate and life. Academic Press, San Diego, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler JRA, Wong GY, Metcalfe DJ, Honzak M, Pert PL, Rao N, van Grieken ME, Lawson T, Bruce C, Kroon FJ, Brodie JE (2013) An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:176–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao SX, Chen L, Yu XX (2009) Impact of China’s Grain for Green Project on the landscape of vulnerable arid and semi-arid agricultural regions: a case study in northern Shaanxi Province. J Appl Ecol 46:536–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol 4:2138–2152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen LD, Wei W, Fu BJ, Lu YH (2007) Soil and water conservation on the Loess Plateau in China: review and perspective. Prog Phys Geogr 31:389–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen LD, Yang L, Wei W, Wang ZT, Mo BR, Cai GJ (2013) Towards sustainable integrated watershed ecosystem management: a case study in Dingxi on the Loess Plateau, China. Environ Manag 51:126–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, deGroot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, Oneill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie AL, Penman TD, Gorissen L, Winslow MD, Lehmann J, Tyrrell TD, Twomlow S, Wilkes A, Lal R, Jones JW, Paulsch A, Kellner K, Akhtar-Schuster M (2011) Towards sustainable land management in the drylands: scientific connections in monitoring and assessing dryland degradation, climate change and biodiversity. Land Degrad Dev 22:248–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond JR, Ausseil A-GE, Ekanayake JC, Kirschbaum MUF (2012) Tradeoffs between soil, water, and carbon—a national scale analysis from New Zealand. J Environ Manag 95:124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Bode M, Richardson DM (2009) Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol Conserv 142:553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fu BJ, Zhao WW, Chen LD, Zhang QJ, Lu YH, Gulinck H, Poesen J (2005) Assessment of soil erosion at large watershed scale using RUSLE and GIS: a case study in the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degrad Dev 16:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu BJ, Liu Y, Lu YH, He CS, Zeng Y, Wu BF (2011) Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China. Ecol Complex 8:284–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein JH, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, Ennaanay D, Hannahs N, Mendoza G, Polasky S, Wolny S, Daily GC (2012) Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:7565–7570

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO (1974) Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method. journal of the royal statistical society. Ser C (Appl Stat) 23:340–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones KB, Zurlini G, Kienast F, Petrosillo I, Edwards T, Wade TG, Li BL, Zaccarelli N (2013) Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge. Landscape Ecol 28:1175–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph A et al (2005) Millenium ecosystem assessment. In: Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC

  • Lautenbach S, Kugel C, Lausch A, Seppelt R (2011) Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecol Ind 11:676–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu YH, Fu BJ, Feng XM, Zeng Y, Liu Y, Chang RY, Sun G, Wu BF (2012) A policy-driven large scale ecological restoration: quantifying ecosystem services changes in the Loess Plateau of China. PloS One 7(2):e31782

  • Martinez ML, Perez-Maqueo O, Vazquez G, Castillo-Campos G, Garcia-Franco J, Mehltreter K, Equihua M, Landgrave R (2009) Effects of land use change on biodiversity and ecosystem services in tropical montane cloud forests of Mexico. For Ecol Manag 258:1856–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:2959–2971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu J, Turner MG (2013) Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:12149–12154

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5242–5247

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues RR, Gandolfi S, Nave AG, Aronson J, Barreto TE, Vidal CY, Brancalion PHS (2011) Large-scale ecological restoration of high-diversity tropical forests in SE Brazil. For Ecol Manag 261:1605–1613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawut M, Eziz M, Tiyip T (2013) The effects of land-use change on ecosystem service value of desert oasis: a case study in Ugan-Kuqa River Delta Oasis, China. Can J Soil Sci 93:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiders A, Van Daele T, Van Landuyt W, Van Reeth W (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: complementary approaches for ecosystem management? Ecol Ind 21:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S (2011) A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J Appl Ecol 48:630–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serna-Chavez HM, Schulp CJE, van Bodegom PM, Bouten W, Verburg PH, Davidson MD (2014) A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecol Ind 39:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su CH, Fu BJ (2013) Evolution of ecosystem services in the Chinese Loess Plateau under climatic and land use changes. Glob Planet Change 101:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su CH, Fu BJ, Wei YP, Lu YH, Liu GH, Wang DL, Mao KB, Feng XM (2012) Ecosystem management based on ecosystem services and human activities: a case study in the Yanhe watershed. Sustain Sci 7:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallis H, Kareiva P, Marvier M, Chang A (2008) An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9457–9464

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu BF, Xong J, Yan NN, Yang LD, Du X (2008) ETWatch for monitoring regional evapotranspiration with remote sensing. Adv Water Sci 19:671–678 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Feng Z, Gao Y, Peng J (2013) Hotspot and relationship identification in multiple landscape services: a case study on an area with intensive human activities. Ecol Ind 29:529–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu XL, Zhou B, Lu XZ, Yang ZG (2012) Evaluation of water conservation function in mountain forest areas of Beijing based on InVEST model. Sci Silvae Sin 10:1–5 (in Chinese)

  • Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37:701–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Liu X (2006) Digital topography analysis. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (No. 41230745).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bojie Fu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 4493kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Z., Fu, B., Hu, H. et al. A method to identify the variable ecosystem services relationship across time: a case study on Yanhe Basin, China. Landscape Ecol 29, 1689–1696 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0088-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0088-x

Keywords

Navigation